Jesus H. Christ

De otros lados

[Ita María @itamaria83]

Colombia cada 4 años

[aircraftcabin @aircraftcabin]

Miami?? You mean Latina Israel?

[Black Magic Woman @monicapalacios]

Lo que una lee por aquí. Que destripar nunca fue en sentido literal. Pues claro que no; nadie nunca pensó en una sacada de tripas real. Lo grave es que no hay ni una sola interpretación en sentido figurado en la que destripar no represente una eliminación, una supresión.

[Jesus H. Christ @bloqueerratico]

@bedoyajuanseb @petrogustavo Fuente?

[𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉 @OrevaZSN]

I don’t just hate generative AI slop. I also hate golf, lawns, space tourism, war, monoculture farming, clear-cutting forests, building on floodplains, deep-sea mining, development that destroys habitats, bulldozing ecosystems for endless “growth,” and data centres.

[Mañu @unboliqueso]

- Abelardo, ¿qué propones para mejorar el país?
- Lo que sea necesario.
- ¿Y para la salud?
- Lo que haya que hacer.
- ¿Y en seguridad?
- Lo que se necesite. Mano dura.
- ¿Y económicamente?
- Lo que diga el doctor José Manuel.
- ¿Y para la educación?
- Grrrr. Miau.

[Edgar_316 @316_edgar]

El poder más eficaz es el que te convence de que su visión del mundo es la única posible. 🤡
Gran explicación de cómo la ultraderecha y los terratenientes logran que el pueblo vote en contra de sus propios intereses económicos a punta de pura violencia simbólica. Dejen de comer tanto cuento. 👇🏼

[Casandro Martell @CasandroMartell]

Observen cuál fue el método empleado para agregarle votos a Abelardo.
!DIFUNDIR URGENTE!

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

Fascinating argument by Bloomberg's top energy analyst Javier Blas 👇: he argues that China effectively saved the world economy during the Iran war by absorbing the brunt of the global oil supply shock on its own, without visible economic damage.

According to his calculations, China "cut its average daily waterborne oil imports by the same amount as the combined oil consumption of Germany, France and the UK."

And, still according to Blas, they "did so without suffering economic harm" because they could rely on many levers: their huge strategic petroleum reserve, a massive surge in EV usage, their remaining coal-fired electricity capacity, and coal-to-chemicals replacing lost feedstocks.

Had China not been ready to absorb that blow, a good argument can be made that the economic damage to the West, and the world at large, would have spiraled far beyond what we saw.

Effectively, China's energy strategy at all levels (petroleum reserves, EVs, etc.) and its ability to withstand huge supply shocks paid off for everyone, not just for them.

It sounds awfully familiar: in 2008 too it was China's stimulus package and continuous buying of US Treasuries that averted a complete breakdown of the global financial system.

So twice in 20 years the country the West loves to present as a "threat" to the global economy effectively saved it from a US-made global economic disaster 🤷

[Ana BejaranoRicaurte @AnaBejaranoRG]

Empiezan a llevarse a la gente presa por lo que piensa, sin ningún debido proceso, pero les parece exagerado llamarlo fascismo.

[Nicolás Sánchez Arévalo @ANicolasSanchez]

"Despolitizarla": el viejo sueño de derechizar algo

[Jorge Iván Cuervo R. @cuervoji]

El consumo cultural define lo político, la derecha lo entendió. Gramsci lo predijo hace mucho.

[Mobility Behaviour 👨‍🎓 @davidlois_uned]

Análisis de 32 millones de tweets de representantes políticos de 26 países durante 6 años: los partidos ultraderechistas son los principales responsables de difundir bulos e información falsa.

[𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎 @hellspatisserie]

At some point in mental illness you stop going “I’m so sorry it’s because of the depression/autism/adhd” and start going “I’m not well in the head. I do what I want. Stay out of my way” and this, ironically, will massively improve your day-to-day mental health

[‏ً @omgsidewalks]

The best response I’ve seen to AI anything has been, “why should i bother reading something that nobody could be bothered to write”

[Manuel Sanchez @ManuSanchezG]

Y para esto, queridos niños, sirve una guerra!

[unusual_whales @unusual_whales]

"AI is likely to produce neither a job apocalypse nor productivity utopia, but something harder to measure: a quiet degradation of the quality of the jobs that remain," per Bloomberg

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Fred Rogers met with a child psychologist every week for 22 years to build his show. She shaped everything: every script, prop, and song. The whole point was to give a child's nervous system time to slow down. In 1984, a single regulatory decision ended all of it.

The psychologist was Dr. Margaret McFarland, who co-founded the Arsenal Family and Children's Center alongside Benjamin Spock and Erik Erikson. She and Rogers understood that the prefrontal cortex in children, the part of the brain that controls impulse, emotion, and attention, takes decades to fully develop. At the start of every episode, Rogers tied his sneakers and changed his sweater while children settled in. Those pauses were intentional, designed to help a child's nervous system shift into a calmer, more focused state.

What ended it had nothing to do with child development science. In 1984, Reagan's FCC chairman Mark Fowler abolished the advertising limits that had protected children's programming from commercial pressure. Toy companies moved within months. Between 1984 and 1985, cartoons tied to toy lines increased by 300%, from a handful of shows to more than 40 animated series. In almost every case, the toy was designed first. The cartoon was built to sell it.

Researchers later put numbers to what parents were already noticing. A 2011 study in Pediatrics from the University of Virginia tested 60 four-year-olds across three groups: one watching SpongeBob, which cuts scene every 11 seconds; one watching a slow PBS show, which cuts scene every 34 seconds; and one drawing. Nine minutes later, all three took tests on attention, impulse control, short-term memory, and problem-solving. The SpongeBob group scored significantly worse across every measure.

In the 1970s, children began watching television around age 4. Research from pediatrician Dimitri Christakis found that by 2009, the average age of first screen exposure had dropped to 4 months, as the content got faster and the audience got younger. Researchers separately found that each additional hour of daily screen time at ages 1 or 3 raised the risk of attention problems at age 7 by 9%.

[Esther Cst 🌾🍉 @AlasRojasAlas]

Menos manuales de estoicismo y resiliencia para adaptarte a la precariedad, y más sindicarse y quemar contenedores.

[Jesus H. Christ @bloqueerratico]

@hanwenzhang1982 Seguramente es parte del plan. Sabían que por negligencia o por conveniencia las sanciones iban a llegar después de que el daño estuviera hecho.