𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦
Jeremy Clarkson has never pretended to be anything other than exactly what he is
Brutally honest. No oil painting. A pot belly, a lifelong smoker, a drinker. Not exactly the modern alpha male or is he?
And somehow that is the whole point
I have watched him for most of my life
First as a motoring journalist who could make you want a car you would never own and never need
Then as something bigger
The loudest, funniest, most unfiltered mouthpiece the ordinary person ever had
A man who said the thing everyone was thinking while the rest of television tiptoed around it
From Top Gear he built something that should not have worked
Three middle aged men, The Stig, a track and a chemistry you cannot manufacture
James May the patient one
Richard Hammond the brave one
And Clarkson the force of nature dragging both of them into chaos and somehow back out again
When it all fell apart at the BBC he could have disappeared
The fracas was not his finest hour and he never pretended it was
He owned it, apologized and carried on
No reinvention, no groveling tour, no carefully managed comeback
He just kept being himself and let the work speak
The move to Amazon and The Grand Tour proved something I think a lot of people missed
The format was never the magic
The men were
You can take three friends out of a studio and drop them anywhere on earth and the loyalty between them travels with them
But it is Clarkson's Farm where the whole picture finally comes into focus
Here is a man with nothing left to prove walking into a field he barely understands and refusing to fake competence he does not have
He has run that farm at break even and then at an outright loss in full public view
No editing it into a success story
No pretending the numbers work when they do not
His farm manager hands him one brutal truth after another and he sits there and takes it
A whole season swallowed by drought even after he leaned into robotics and the most advanced farming money could buy
Technology was supposed to be the answer and the weather did not care
He showed that too
Most people would have cut it
And through all of it he has done something quietly remarkable
He has dragged the plight of the British farmer into the light
The paperwork, the council, the margins that vanish, the weather that ruins a year of work in a week
People who had never thought about where their food comes from suddenly cared because he made them care
And then there is the part nobody warned me about
Men who raise animals for meat and still love them
Who name them, worry about them, sit with them
Who treat them with respect and dignity right up to the moment they cannot keep them
And feel the full weight of sending them off
He does not hide that
He lets the camera sit in the discomfort of it
The grief of a man who knows the deal he made and still finds it hard
That is not weakness
That is honesty most people are far too afraid to show
We live in an age that rewards the polished, the curated, the carefully built personal brand
And here is a scruffy, swearing, chain smoking farmer who has done the opposite of all of it and won
He stayed exactly who he was while the world begged him to become a product
That is the whole secret
There is no act
There never was
And that is exactly why we keep watching
Praying for a full recovery mate, looking forward to another season of Clarkson's Farms!
When music brings people together… One lone piper from Scotland and Boston’s finest bucket-drum maestro somehow created the collaboration nobody knew they needed 🥹
That's a line up to lose. They just don't get it. Can't believe we are rolling out the red carpet for Spurs' safety. Probably agreed in the Directors box a couple of games back. #cfc#bluecoout
@DougieCritchley I'd take whatever we had earned. We are where we are. We have no right to pick and choose.
Like it or loathe it, the Conference league helped get game time into the fringe players on many occasions.
#Bluecoout
It’s official, it’s a terrible season for Chelsea, the club world champions. No trophies, ninth in the table, danger of not qualifying for any European competition, players speaking out, fans protesting, managerial churn, inexperienced caretaker. Some of the players are culpable, not given enough, not taken responsibility when needed.
But this is largely down to the owners, to their flawed approach to recruitment, to their lack of connection to the fanbase, to their astonishing naivety. Chelsea fans deserve better. They deserve more leaders on the field and any leader in the boardroom. They deserve more expertise in the recruitment department. Owners need a rethink. Club needs a reset. #CFC #FACupfinal #CHEMCI
Bookmark It
Chelsea were happy to proceed with Alonso but ultimately felt his heart and long term desire was elsewhere. The club believed total commitment to the project was required given the critical phase of development Chelsea currently find themselves in.
Owners, sporting directors and Iraola now fully aligned on project vision, recruitment structure and wider footballing strategy.
Iraola always highly admired internally and viewed as one of the standout coaching profiles in European football.
The briefs are going to be absolutely incredible when this happens 😭
The fan meltdown will be on a completely different level.
Dear @ebehdad
RE: The Conflict of Perverse Incentives
I want to be fair to you. You had less than a month to structure a complex billion pound transaction, so some mistakes were always going to happen. But the mistake I’m describing isn’t an execution error. It’s a conceptual flaw baked into the deal from day one, and it has permanently poisoned your strategic position.
You built a structure with three stakeholder groups, and you only have a fiduciary duty to one of them. That was always going to end badly. Let me explain why.
A man came to you and said he had £300m and wanted to buy a business for £4.2bn. Two of his mates would chip in £300m each. You lent him the rest. To their credit, they’ve been matching cash calls ever since. But here is what you actually agreed to: you needed Boehly’s money, which meant Boehly got something in return. What he got was influence over the sporting operation. And the first thing he did with it was sack Thomas Tuchel so he could have his dressing room access.
That decision, made to protect your financial relationship with a co-investor who couldn’t actually afford the asset, is what set everything else in motion.
Roman left you a blueprint. He won trophies, built a global brand, and maintained a fair value that always exceeded his cost basis. Central to that was Cobham. Fans across England sing “he’s one of our own” for a reason. That bond between a club and its homegrown players is not sentiment. It is enterprise value. You dismantled it. You sold the graduates and killed the pipeline, not because it made sporting sense, but because your financial model required short term asset monetisation over long term brand construction.
You have now spent more on transfers than any ownership group in the history of football. Chelsea are currently 9th. Below Brentford. Below Brighton. That is the sporting output of your model, and those fans who sang “he’s one of our own” have noticed.
Here is where your conceptual flaw becomes permanent. Boehly has £100m of interest accrued and payable to Ares. You have at least £600m sitting in the Cayman Islands, accruing and payable to COP III. Across the group the interest bill is approaching £400m this year. That means you have no choice but to run this club for one purpose: to make debt service payments. Managing a football club to pay interest has never worked in the history of this game unless you’re Manchester United. Your problem is that you don’t have their revenues. So you are flipping players to fund cash flow.
There will be no properly experienced signings. No manager with real authority. No trophies. You’re caught in a sell-to-buy death spiral and fans have worked out exactly what is happening.
If you’ve made it this far in my letter, this is the part I’d encourage you to sit up and focus on. You need the fans more than they need you. Every day more of them are learning what this structure actually means for the club they love, and they are making a rational decision: do not buy the brand of an owner who is just here to pay interest.
Your perverse incentive is to balance the books, manage the asset, and extract the best possible valuation before the debt matures. Their perverse incentive is to make sure you never get there, because the only exit that actually serves their interests is Ares foreclosing and forcing a sale to someone who can run this club properly.
Think about what that means. The fans who generate the revenue you need to service your debt are now rationally incentivised to undermine that revenue.
You created a structure where your key stakeholder group is rooting for your creditor to take the club from you. That is not a communication problem or a PR problem. It is a structural conflict with no resolution inside your current ownership model.
I’m not sure what the long term prognosis is for a business in that position. But I think you already know.
Yours truly,
bf
🚨🗣️ Pochettino on why he left Chelsea on the Overlap:
“Todd Boehly promised me during the interview when he hired me that we would build the project around the academy and give young players proper time to develop. He betrayed every single one of those promises the moment the season started.
The club was obsessed with making profit from players. That became the only thing that mattered. Whenever a young player didn’t start or didn’t get enough minutes, the owners got angry because they needed those games to push up the player’s value for the next sale. It was never about football, it was always about the balance sheet.
I loved Ian Maatsen and Lewis Hall. I saw real Chelsea future in them, proper academy boys who could become top players here. But the club only saw money. They pushed them out because they wanted the cash. Then they went and bought subpar replacements who couldn’t even do the basics. It was embarrassing.
The only reason we even got Cole Palmer is because I convinced them. I had to fight tooth and nail, show them the clips, explain why he was different. Without me, that deal would never have happened.
In the end, I couldn’t work like that. I left because I love football too much to be part of a project that only cares about trading human beings for profit.”
📣 Sorry for the turtleneck rant, but how is Mudryk still sitting on the balance sheet at £44m with zero impairment?
Chelsea’s own accounting policy says players with specific impairment indicators get assessed individually against their Fair Value Less Costs to Sell (“FVLCTS”).
Mudryk has not played in two years. His doping case is now at CAS. Who is buying him, and at what price? His FVLCTS is not £44m. It is close to zero, and @KPMG signed off on accounts in November 2025 knowing exactly that.
They applied the same treatment to Sterling. He was put in the bomb squad before the 30 June 2025 balance sheet date. His net book value of £19m should have been written off, Chelsea was also sitting on a contractual liability of roughly £31m in remaining wages!!
That is £50m on Sterling alone, before we even write off Mudryk’s £44m. At least £94m of additional losses belonged in the 2025 accounts.
Maybe Jacobs will tell us that Blueco will make more revenue than Arsenal and Liverpool in FY2026 so we shouldn’t worry about these losses?