Bluesislife

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.

One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”

Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.

Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.

Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

This is who the juror had to put up with for 7 days to prevent Lindsay Clancy's acquittal

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

Three Female Jurors on the Lindsay Clancy trial just threw a FIT on Live TV over the brave juror who REFUSED to let Clancy off the hook with MURDER.

Of course the jury was made up of EXACTLY who you’d expect.

One of them even says she was “EXCITED” to start filling out her “Not Guilty” forms before the lone juror said he was standing his ground.

How can so many women bring themselves to defend someone who murdered their own children?

We also deserve to know how Lindsay Clancy’s attorney had intimate knowledge of the jury deliberations.

Did one of them leak?

[GEORGE LUCAS JR. @VitoComedy]

I think internet articles should have to include a photo of who wrote them

[Iraqveteran8888 @Iraqveteran8888]

There should be a mandatory prison sentence for every 3rd world person we catch throwing trash in our streets, oceans, lakes, and rivers. If I witness that shit I’m going to totally go ape shit on them. Arrest me. I don’t care. They have to learn we aren’t going to accept that behavior here.

[Z @insatiablevine]

If you just let us keep our money instead of taxing the fuck out of our paychecks, you wouldn’t have to invent federal social programs to help working families — you’d eliminate the rampant fraud and potential for abuse. 🤔

End the income tax. End of story.

[Western Lensman @WesternLensman]

James Talarico is slippery as hell.

The problem is, even local media attempting to press him on his rhetorical and factual distortions either aren't equipped, or refuse, to ask the appropriate follow ups.

Prime example:

Reporter asked Talarico why Texans should believe he will buck his own party when it comes to Texas' interests.

Talarico responds that he's "called out Biden on the border."

Reporter then asks when he's called on Biden policies -- *during* or after the admin ended?

Talarico responds that he called out Biden mid-presidency in a speech in 2022.

Notice the very precise language used here. He did NOT say he called out Biden on the border in 2022, just that he called out the admin's policies -- an artful dodge.

Ok, so let's take at what he said in his biggest speech of 2022 at the Texas State Democratic Convention.

He actually DID call out Biden.

But here's the rub:

He called out Biden for NOT BEING AGGRESSIVELY HARD LEFT ENOUGH:

- Lease federal land to abortion providers
- Impeach SCOTUS Justices
- Prosecute Trump
- Call the filibuster a Jim Crow relic

No mention of the border crisis at all, of course. Which was raging at the time.

As an additional note, look at his tone and delivery in the speech to state Democrats vs the image he presents now in a general election.

Talarico somehow now wants Texans to believe he's some sort of centrist, independent maverick ready to fight his own party.

Total fraud. Slippery as hell. But a total fraud.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

America's fertility problem is almost entirely an abortion problem

It is not that American women are not having children

It is that they are killing those children instead of letting them live

[Bluesislife @bluesislife]

@Mrgunsngear Two things.
1. Nice tan. But take it easy.
2. Dance better than I'd expect for a bald white guy.

[Eagle Ed Martin @EagleEdMartin]

Next step!!!

[Anglo Invictus @AngloInvictus]

If you are pro-White they will send in literally every police car they have to raid you and then drag you through the judicial system for littering (not joking)

Meanwhile blacks takeover entire streets and burn down cities anytime they feel like it and nothing ever happens.

[NotKennyRogers @NotKennyRogers]

What would the verdict have been if Lindsay Clancy had killed George Floyd?

[Eagle Ed Martin @EagleEdMartin]

Never, ever give up your guns.
Nor your 2A rights.

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

🚨 Lindsay Clancy's attorney talks about how "WONDERFUL" and "BRAVE" she is

THE BlTCH KlLLED THREE KIDS.

She's a DEMON that needs to be sent straight to hell in an electric wheelchair.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

The defense just confirmed in open court that the hold out juror is a man. It's one sane man against two simps and nine girlbosses. Hold the line, sir.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

🚨#BREAKING: A mother is FURIOUS after a Pennsylvania town CRIMINALLY CHARGED her two little girls, ages 10 and 12, and dragged them into court...

...because a playground swing broke while they were spinning on it.

Yes, you read that right.

The two girls twisted the chains to get dizzy, the chain snapped, and the borough's response was CRIMINAL MSCHIEF CHARGES for a 10-year-old.

This is Springdale, Pennsylvania, just outside Pittsburgh.

On May 21st, a group of kids were playing at Veterans Memorial Park where two sat on the swing and the others twisted the chains up tight and let go, so the swing would spin them dizzy.

Every one of us did this as a kid... hundreds of times.

The chain broke. Nobody was hurt.

Two weeks later, a POLICE OFFICER showed up at Katie Huss's front door with SURVEILLANCE PHOTOS of the children on a swing.

The borough had split the repair bill among five kids.

$59 dollars each.

Three families paid up and their kids' charges disappeared.

Katie demanded more information:

"Show me the evidence my daughters did this on purpose and show me the swing was even inspected prior to this occuring."

She didn't pay and so her 10 and 12-year-old daughters were CHARGED WITH A CRIME.

Criminal mischief.

BY the way... under Pennsylvania's criminal code, that is a charge that requires INTENT.

The two little girls were terrified and had to sit in a courtroom while a police officer testified against them for "not using the swing properly."

Thankfully, the judge threw it out and found them not guilty.

It was CLEARLY an accident, not a crime.

...you would think it would end there, but it doesn't!!!

The borough is now threatening to sue this mother in CIVIL court over $180.

And Katie still hasn't been allowed to see the video they used against her children, it was shown to the lawyers, but not to the mom.

Nearly every single day, violent repeat offenders WALK OUT OF JAIL ALL THE TIME to prey on innocent people...

...but INSTEAD of dealing with that, we have built a system that lets predators go and prosecutes children for playing AT A PARK USING SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE TO WATCH THEM

America, we have LOST THE FREAKING PLOT!!!!

[Sowellstradamus @sowellstradamus]

We never needed Mexicans or Guatemalans

They just didn’t want to pay us

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

"You'll be judged by a jury of your peers"

The peers:

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

Theft and burglary beyond a certain amount, and all armed robbery, should be death penalty crimes. You’re destroying someone’s life. Your life should be forfeit in return. Our ancestors understood this. We have become far too squeamish and the dregs of society profit as a result.

[Mostly Peaceful Memes @MostlyPeaceful]

There’s a right wing argument for Flock:

-Mass arrests for “teen takeovers” attendees
- Illegal Immigration Deportation
- Tracking and arrest Antifa / Anti ICE operatives

But we all know what it will look like when the Left takes control back.

- COVID lockdowns on steroids
- Jan 6 style witch hunts
- Used to track down anyone who resists anarcho tyranny

I’m pretty uninterested in Flock while we live under the tyranny of mass democracy and political power can change hands at a moments notice.