not to be that friend who’s too woke but i was working some pretty high profile jobs before coming out and now i have to hide that i’m trans to even land a fast food gig, getting a job as a trans woman is one of the hardest things to do
@WhiskerWealth@AMK_PhD@skdh Buddy, I'm not sure who you think is buying that lie, but in any case, you have no arguments. You've made a false statement that one needs to survey all astrophysicists to know what the consensus is, and I told you why that's false. YOU have failed to make a rebuttal. Try again.
@WhiskerWealth@AMK_PhD@skdh You don’t need to survey every single astrophysicist to know that a paper that is contrary to what is taught in every textbook written by every astrophysicist goes against consensus. Try again.
@PrixSarkar420@WitherTim@martinmbauer Sure, he found people thousands of times smarter than him who got all the work done. Plus he has a BSc in physics, which obviously makes him the dark matter expert, as undergraduates spend all their time learning all about cutting-edge theory. Desperate Musk stan.
@WhiskerWealth@AMK_PhD@skdh ignoring it will guarantee you holding to far more false beliefs than holding to it will. This is definitely not to say that *scientists* should not question or go against the consensus, but it is to say that random people on twitter shouldn’t make all this fuss about 1 guy.
@WhiskerWealth@AMK_PhD@skdh I’m not going to entertain this much. Will just point out one thing for those interested in an actual convo.
Science not is done by consensus, sure, but consensus tends to be a pretty good indicator of where the data points. Like any indicator, it occasionally fails, though 1/2
@AMK_PhD@skdh I am not sure how that is a rebuttal to what I said. You will occasionally get the rebel who happens to be correct, but more often than not, the crank you championed is just flat-out wrong. I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t want to be betting on the crank.
@AMK_PhD@skdh I'm baffled as to how a scientist of your caliber would make that point. Sure, it's possible that there lies among us some Galileo who-despite now being deemed crank-will revolutionize science. It is important however to recognize that *most* of those deemed cranks *are* wrong!
@joerogan would love to come on your show and talk about the real science of all of this. I wrote a book about it, which I'm very proud of.
https://t.co/QkMlPWUqYv
@vlhill1@KarenInIllinois@BostonGlobe If they can, and they want to, they should. Plus, I really think algebra can be taught even before arithmetic, and in this way, even help the kid understand arithmetic in a systematic manner, especially if the kid in question is pretty good at abstract thinking.
@space_stations@WitherTim@martinmbauer I'm sure nobody here is insinuating that engineering or applied physics is inferior to theoretical physics. I, on the other hand, don't quite like the way you've used the phrase "real physics."
@WitherTim@martinmbauer Because it's not a simple disagreement. There are experts who know what they're doing who are telling people who don't know anything at all about the field that they're wrong. That's the nature of the situation here.
@WitherTim@martinmbauer A far more accurate and charitable interpretation of what Martin had said is that that's an indicator that someone doesn't really know much at all about dark matter, which is true.
@WitherTim@martinmbauer I'm sure Martin did not mean that anyone who doesn't know the current status of DM among the experts knows nothing about any branch of physics. There are many physicists who work in e.g. atomic physics who will not necessarily have up-to-date knowledge of problems in astro/hep
@WitherTim@martinmbauer You think HE launches rockets? Besides, knowing how to launch a rocket literally has nothing to do with one's knowledge regarding cutting-edge theory.