Lindsay Clancy had a "psychotic break." Which is why she planned the murder, researched her plan on Google, sent her husband away from the house, and then methodically executed her children over the course of several minutes. I never knew that you could plan your psychotic break like that. Just pencil it into your calendar. I'm learning so much about "mental health" from the morally bankrupt imbeciles on this site and TikTok. Thank you for this education.
What a slap in the face to American cattlemen & consumers. Worse than socialism! Dumping foreign beef in U.S. markets can temporarily lower prices but it won’t incentivize American farmers to raise more beef. Bring back Country Of Origin Labels & pass my PRIME Act.
“So you're going to keep draining the SPR to suppress the oil price?”
“Yes, Dave”
“And when there is nothing left, the price of oil is going to skyrocket and crush the the global economy”
“That's right, Dave”
Imagine if Flock cameras had existed during COVID lockdowns.
How easy it would have been for the state to punish people over arbitrary rules: large gatherings, going to the beach, attending church, or being out when you “weren’t supposed to be.”
If Flock is all about increasing public safety, the people pushing it should be willing to put one in their own homes.
You have nothing to hide, right?
Another HUGE 2nd Amendment win for America 🇺🇸
Judge Reed O'Connor threw out President Biden's "Ghost Gun / 80% receiver" ban yesterday in SAF's lawsuit 🤌🏽
He stated:
"The Final Rule is unconstitutional under the 2nd Amendment & void for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment"
Multiple businesses were bankrupted after spending millions of dollars in litigation costs due to this BS/CLEARLY unconstitutional "rule" but the statists don't care about any of that.
Buy "80% kits" accordingly...
#CivilRights #2nd #CivilRights #ReedOConnor #ghostgun #2a #SAF
🚨BREAKING🚨
Judge Reed O'Connor strikes down Biden's "Ghost Gun" ban after SCOTUS upheld it on statutory grounds in Vanderstok v. Garland.
"[T]he Final Rule is unconstitutional under the 2nd Amendment & void for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment..."