I just opened a 59-card Topps Series 2 hanger box...
12 duplicate cards.
That means 24 of the 59 cards were part of duplicate pairs.
Over 40% of the box wasn't unique.
Is this normal now, or has Topps' collation gone downhill?
@topps@CardPurchaser@Collect
Dear Milan sir & Jainam Broking, @parikhmilan20@jainambroking
I have been trying to reach you through messages, emails, and calls for quite some time now, but have unfortunately not received any response. I am now left with no option but to escalate this through public channels in the hope that it reaches your attention.
Since the news regarding Nimit Shah and Hiren Jadhav’s fraudulent activities and the involvement of Darshan Joshi (Itrade91), my life has been completely disrupted. I am one of the affected individuals who entrusted a significant portion of my life savings to Darshan Joshi, with the understanding that I would receive a leveraged prop trading account through Jainam Broking.
Since October 2025, it has been an ongoing struggle to recover my funds. While there was an interim arrangement where margin was provided to some of us through internal coordination involving Darshan Joshi, Devang Topiwala, and yourself, that too lasted barely two months. Additionally, profits rightfully earned were not paid out, and there has been no clarity on the timeline for returning the original deposit.
I am currently facing a severe personal crisis. A close family member is battling a critical illness and has been undergoing immunotherapy for the past two years. Doctors have now advised a complex surgery, which requires substantial financial resources. This situation was already discussed with Darshan Joshi and Sajid Memon during my visit to your office on 17th February. I also visited Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital on 24th April, where the urgency of the treatment was reiterated.
As the sole breadwinner of my family, I am in a helpless position and urgently need my funds to proceed with the treatment. It is extremely distressing that despite repeated follow-ups, there has been no resolution.
It is difficult to believe that such large-scale misconduct could have occurred without the knowledge of Jainam’s leadership. I have also come across information suggesting that settlements have been made with several individuals and groups, including high-value case, withdrawal of ~5-7 cr from Devang Topiwala by Darshan Joshi and another big name in the option selling who threaten to expose Darshan’s situation on the social media after the collapse of Nimit Shah/Green Wall Enterprises. If that is true, I fail to understand why cases like mine continue to be overlooked.
I request you with folded hands to please prioritize my case and arrange for the immediate return of my funds. I have complete documentation of all transactions made to Darshan Joshi, along with records of trading under BRANCH NIMI and DT and can provide any additional details required.
Please understand that this is not just a financial issue for me—it is a matter of urgency tied to a life-threatening medical situation. I sincerely hope for a prompt and fair resolution. However, if I do not receive a response, I will be compelled to explore all available options to recover my hard-earned money.
I am currently running between hospitals, trying to get clearer guidance on the treatment, all while being burdened by the constant dilemma of how I will manage the hospitalization expenses. The amount of my deposit is significant for me and my family, even if it may not be substantial from your perspective. At this critical juncture, I sincerely believe that you have the ability to help me navigate this extremely difficult personal situation, and I request your support in facilitating the immediate return of my funds.
AN OPEN LETTER TO TRADINGVIEW FROM AN ADMIRER
I’ve always been a big admirer of the team at @tradingview for what they’ve built and how they’ve transformed the charting experience for traders. I’ve also been quite vocal about the importance of investing in essential tools rather than hesitating over such costs.
However, the recently introduced symbol limits per watchlist, even on paid plans, feel like a step backward. I understand the intent to increase ARPU and push upgrades, but reducing the Premium plan limit from 1000 to 500 symbols is quite restrictive, especially considering it’s already at the upper end of what retail traders in India can afford.
This change feels unjustified and, ideally, the earlier limits should be restored. If that’s not feasible, then at least increasing the caps would be a fair middle ground, bringing Premium back to 1000 symbols, and raising Essential and Plus tiers to 250 and 500 respectively.
Now, one might argue why anyone would need such a large number of symbols in a watchlist and how it actually helps.
What most traders, and even the team at TradingView, may not fully understand about India is the concept of circuit filters enforced by our regulators. This is quite unique to Indian markets. Since international platforms don’t provide a way to exclude stocks based on these filters directly in scanners, we are forced to first eliminate such stocks using local tools.
To avoid illiquid names, especially those stuck in 2% or 5% circuit filters, we have to create a refined “Total Universe” watchlist first. Only then can we effectively run scans on TradingView. If we skip this step and rely purely on inbuilt scanners, results often get cluttered with circuit-bound stocks, which are practically untradeable and hard to filter out afterward.
Currently, National Stock Exchange of India has around 2300 listed stocks. Even after filtering out illiquid names and those under strict circuit limits, we are still left with roughly 900 to 1100 stocks depending on market conditions. This already exceeds even the earlier limits. I had earlier requested increasing these limits, but the recent change has gone in the opposite direction, making it almost impractical to use TradingView’s watchlist-based scanning effectively in Indian markets.
I’ve used multiple platforms over the years, free and paid, desktop and web, and haven’t encountered such restrictive limitations elsewhere. This kind of constraint could actually give competing platforms an opportunity to challenge TradingView, at least in the Indian market.
On behalf of retail traders and the fintwit community, I would strongly request the TradingView team to restore the earlier limits. If changes are unavoidable, then at least consider increasing the limits as suggested earlier.
I’d also urge the fintwit community to support and amplify this, so the importance of this issue is clearly communicated.
@Marks800@CardPurchaser I had one that showed up 30 days after tracking said it was delivered. Got one right now that states delivered 5 days ago and it’s still not here. It’s hardly ever accurate.
@EricSFW@AirJordans2323@KingJames@YIN_and_YANG_oo He wasnt gifted with longevity. I imagine a lot of top players could play twenty years when they sit out the second half of every season. LeBron has only one 82 game season. Jordan has 9, including his last season at 40 avg 37 minutes a game.
Want high-quality shrimp and plants for your tanks? 🦐🌿
Head over to https://t.co/s10hzFf2Vu and use my code STEENFOTT5 for 5% off!
Support a small business that ships amazing livestock. 💧 #shrimpkeeping