@danortizmd@btq96r@bgill12971631@dr_cellini The biggest issue with these to me is liability. If I have a different interpretation than the original reading radiologist and i offer it during a tumor conference I am accepting some sort of liability and if I am going to be accepting liability I should be billing for it.
@GoBlueLexi117@ScottDochterman@AriWasserman 1. I rooted for Michigan in this game.
2. It’s better for the big ten if they aren’t vacated.
3. Ari gonna owe Scott money.
4. Have more fun searching twitter to talk shit on old tweets.
@doctor_resnik@ScottDochterman@AriWasserman I’m just curious if the wins were to get vacated if it would impact the bet between Scott and Ari. Nice to know all you Michigan bots really care that Dochterman wins his bet. I personally don’t care either way as I have no skin in the game.
@flugempire When all of the info that Tony Petiti has likely reviewed has come out these documents will likely be child’s play compaired to the info and detailed signal stealing UM had and built their program on.
@flugempire@SteveDHink So this should have been whistled dead and the UNC player should not have been allowed to advance the ball. I think it just goes to show that the rule isn’t very well enforced.
@Boatwagon1@AM090645rt@flugempire By the letter of the rule it is not an incorrect call, but there does seem to be some gray area for interpretation and I doubt anyone would have batted an eye if they let it go. Would have been less controversial to call it live.
Iowa still deserved to lose.
@DPHBuckeyes@flugempire Refs explanation is not the rule book. There is room for interpretation. You can read it how ever suites your narrative but in my view point it is not “clear.” The better team won but to say that the refs call was clearly right based on the ref defending himself isn’t clear IMO.
@DPHBuckeyes@flugempire Nobody - including the refs - reacted like it was a fair catch signal during the game. If he had only returned this for 15 or so yards which would have put Iowa into field goal range would have they reviewed it?