Bob Andrew Piercy

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

Here’s where I stand on abortion.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

If you've done that. I don't hate you. I'm not mad at you. I get that it's a VERY difficult place to be in being pregnant when you didn't want or didn't plan to be.

Continuing to have killing a human as an alternative to get out of that perpetuates killing more humans. If killing a human wasn't an acceptable option fewer people would find themselves in that situation.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@iamamylou @DoomScroling Go ahead and dispute it then you’ve yet to do that

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@Wulf__Sorenson You are pro-comfort, not pro-life.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@colonelkurtz99 If you believe in God humans are created in His image and are a unique class of species.

If you believe in evolution humans have evolved to be omnivores and killing and eating other species is our evolutionary given right to perpetuate our species.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@colonelkurtz99 “You can’t use a speciesist argument”

Why not?

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@SKolls @iamAtheistGirl lol, I never mentioned murder, yet you’re assuming an awful lot.

The bigot here is you.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@grok @bagsiha8 @Kazztheaussie @grok Doesn’t “Software: 2026.14.1” seem inconsistent and incompatible with their standard https://t.co/XhvJM8i4zx convention? Especially considering v12.6.4 was 2026.14.6

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@iamamylou @DoomScroling I've explained why to exhaustion and you've not been able to refute it.

You just falsely re-assert that bodily autonomy applies to things that don't require consent.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@iamamylou @DoomScroling Pregnancy doesn’t require consent therefore it can’t be consented or not consented to and isn’t a question for bodily autonomy which lives in the realm of things that require consent.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

“Consent becomes relevant whenever one person uses another person’s body.”

You’re asserting an absolute that you’ve not justified and isn’t true.

If that human doesn’t require consent, then consent doesn’t become relevant and I’ve proven pregnancy doesn’t require consent and you’ve been unable to counter it, in fact you’ve partially admitted it’s accurate.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

You haven’t addressed it other than agreeing that a ZEF doesn’t need consent to exist.

Instead of acknowledging pregnancy isn’t a matter of consent OR arguing why pregnancy needs consent you pivot to begging the question of unsubstantiated claims that bodily autonomy somehow grants lethal force universally.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@MibshaD Every state has laws that require fathers to support their children, but they don't have those consequences when the mother opts to kill the child 🤷‍♂️

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@BeAncestral4U @___TheGOOdWitch Again, His desire is they respond and receive good. His desire is not to spite them.

“Therefore, they must eat the bitter fruit of living their own way, choking on their own schemes.”
Prov 1:31

God’s letting them get what they wanted, not what God desired for them.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@BeAncestral4U @___TheGOOdWitch In context of that passage it’s painfully obvious God’s desire is they don’t turn away from Him and they reap all the good things He promises instead of turning away from Him.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@BeAncestral4U @___TheGOOdWitch Please google it for me. I’ve read it several times cover to cover.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@BeAncestral4U @___TheGOOdWitch "I take no pleasure in the death of wicked people. I only want them to turn from their wicked ways so they can l live." -God in the Old Testament

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@BeAncestral4U @___TheGOOdWitch I literally quoted 2 Peter 3:9 verbatim.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@Provokethoughtz The definition of baby isn't contingent on it's ability to survive freezing however so your statement isn't a valid proof.

I hope that helps.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@iamamylou @DoomScroling Yet the premise that pregnancy doesn’t require consent hasn’t failed. You haven’t even rebutted it once that I can recall. You simply try to pivot to trying to assert/assume that lethal force for bodily autonomy is a baseline understanding and it’s not.

[Bob Andrew Piercy @bobda]

@Gabriel01731047 @alexboge Ad hominem is attacking the person instead of the arguments. Insults are attacks in the person instead of the arguments. You might also make non-adhom arguments, but the insults are still ad hominem.