DiscomBob

Edinburgher, Scottish, British, European, Human and Earthling

[Queen Bee @KingBobIIV]

When I was organising the march, a Muslim lady contacted me to say the same happens to muslim girls in their community, so they encourage their men to go after British girls instead to keep their own daughters safe. She also said, as many marriages are arranged, they dont want to have to "service" (her word) their husbands so encourage them to take British girls. She reassured me by saying, "not nice girls like your daughter though", like that was some sort of comfort. I was so shocked and disgusted I blocked her.

[DiscomBob @BobDiscom]

@ChiefEgregore @SwiftyRed1989 "Every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable."

And continues to do so.

There isn't even an urgent clamour to learn lessons, let alone implement changes.

People would STILL rather look away than be "racist".

[Chief Egregore Officer @ChiefEgregore]

I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.

I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.

The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.

Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.

This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.

Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.

These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.

This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.

These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.

And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.

It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.

These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.

Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.

Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.

Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.

Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.

NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.

And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.

Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.

As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.

Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.

@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.

The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.

In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.

Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.

[DiscomBob @BobDiscom]

@KateWilton1 They haven't disappeared, though, have they? If they aren't in hotels any longer, where are they?

Dispersed into social housing, displacing others on the waiting list & thereby increasing the demand and hence cost within the rental market.

This is optics, not successful policy.

[DiscomBob @BobDiscom]

@SamCKx I notice in your replies to comments, you keep using "the best age-ID systems" as the basis for your conclusions.

Do you know how govt procurement works?🤣

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Remember when authorities pushed lockdowns saying, "if we save one life, it's worth it"?

Why aren't they saying this about a quarter million children raped by Muslims in the UK?

Why berserk over lockdowns and masks, but now silent about a quarter million raped white girls?

[DiscomBob @BobDiscom]

@TheParty1sOver The Scottish National Party are opposed to [checks notes] displays of Scottish patriotism.🤦‍♂️

[Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio @LeoKearse]

It's interesting that for the 22 people killed by an refugee at the Manchester Arena we're told "don't look back in anger", but for Jo Cox, we're told to constantly look back in anger.

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

🚨 Massive news with worldwide repercussions!

The FTC, along with Alaska, Iowa, Nebraska, and Texas, have filed a lawsuit against the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), alleging the organization has provided the means for medical providers to make false and unsubstantiated claims to parents in order to sell pediatric medical transition services.

WPATH, an association of clinicians who profit from pediatric medical transition services, recommended medical interventions, including drugs and surgery, for children and adolescents who expressed dissatisfaction with or distress about their sex traits. In their complaint, the FTC and its state partners allege that these recommendations misled parents and children about the medical consensus and medical necessity, as well as the safety and effectiveness, of such services, in violation of the FTC Act.

"Today, the FTC filed a lawsuit against WPATH alleging that the organization made false and unsubstantiated claims regarding the necessity, effectiveness and safety of puberty blockers, hormones and sex-change surgeries," said Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson.

"Children, but especially their parents, must have complete and truthful information when making decisions to purchase medical services. For decades, the FTC has taken action against entities that make deceptive and unsubstantiated health-related claims. The complaint filed today reflects that same long-standing mandate: when an entity makes a claim about a medical treatment, the claim must be truthful, evidence-based and not misleading."

In 2022, WPATH omitted all mention of age limitations for breast amputation or penis removal from the "Standards of Care" document providing the organization's official recommendations for treating sex-trait-related dissatisfaction or distress in children.

As alleged in the complaint, WPATH did not base this decision on medical evidence.
As described in the complaint, in several instances, parents seeking help for their children were asked by clinicians whether they "would rather have a live daughter or a dead son," based on WPATH representations that pediatric medical transition services are "lifesaving." As the complaint argues, there is no competent and reliable scientific evidence to suggest these interventions reduce the risk of suicide.

WPATH claims its recommendations represent "consensus-based expert opinion." This leads WPATH members and other clinicians to repeat to consumers false, misleading or unsubstantiated statements about safety and efficacy found in WPATH guidelines, according to the complaint.

According to the complaint, despite the absence of competent and reliable scientific evidence, WPATH's guidelines label nearly every pediatric transition service as "medically necessary" to maximize the likelihood that insurers will pay for the pediatric transition procedures.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

The charities were compromised
The police were compromised
The social services were compromised

The whole entire system needs tearing down piece by piece

The most vile and despicable people live amongst us

Nuremberg style trials must be done

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

This man’s adult son gang raped a 13 year old girl, and after you watch this video you will know exactly why.

There is no guilt. No remorse. In his mind, the victim is to blame - and in his country, she’d be dead in an honor killing.

That, too, is Islam.

[Flopping Aces @FloppingAces]

The gangs raped the girls. Britain’s institutions didn’t just fail to stop it ... they kept supplying fresh victims for decades like it was standard procedure.

Police arrested the girls instead of the rapists. Social services dumped already-groomed kids back into the same houses where they were being passed around.

The NHS patched them up after they were raped with bottles and baseball bats, then sent them right back out the door. Schools watched older Muslim men collecting little white girls at the gates and punished the victims instead of the predators. Politicians from both parties looked at the numbers, the patterns, the fucking horror, and decided their seats and their precious “community relations” mattered more than stopping the industrial-scale rape of their own children.

250,000 girls. Minimum. Raped, trafficked, tortured, filmed, and in some cases shipped overseas. And the state didn’t just look away. It actively recycled them.

Every single checkpoint these kids hit fed them back into the machine. That’s not incompetence. That’s a system that decided the political cost of confronting Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs was higher than the cost of letting them keep operating.

The gangs were evil fucking monsters. But the British state made it scalable. They gave them impunity. They protected the narrative instead of the girls. And they did it for years while pretending this was just some unfortunate local problem.

Fuck that. This was state-enabled predation, plain and simple.
(article below)

[Malcolm Clark @TwisterFilm]

Fantastic news! Surrey Pride was run by two child abusers until recently. It is now run by the men’s sexual partners. Despite promising to publish its review of safeguarding failures the organisation never has. Surrey Pride represents a clear and present danger to kids. 👇

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

Jayne Senior spent twelve years filing reports about the rape of children in Rotherham.

She ran the Risky Business outreach project from 1999 to 2011 and passed roughly 1,700 cases to police and social services.

She was told the girls were consenting. That they would make poor witnesses. That she was breaching the perpetrators' human rights. That she was being racist.

So in 2012 she handed more than 200 confidential documents to a newspaper.

That single act triggered the Jay inquiry, the Casey inspection, the removal of the council's leadership, and criminal investigations that continue today.

The system called her records "rubbish". History calls them evidence.

Why did saving children in Britain require an act of career suicide?

[Kellie-Jay Keen @ThePosieParker]

When I was training as a teacher in Leeds/Bradford in the 90s, I decided not to teach, it was common knowledge that the local Pakistanis came from a particular part of Pakistan that was impoverished and uneducated. These were the families whose daughters disappeared during the summer months never to return to school, shipped off to Pakistan and forced to marry a cousin. No-one discussed how to stop it or even a desire to. These were just how things were.

Same as the “child prostitutes” who didn’t come to school very often.

The teachers and education welfare officers I came into contact with were all the same. Just part of a system that didn’t care, didn’t occur to any of them that these girls deserved better.

Systems are made up of people, they don’t just occur. They are made by every decision each person makes.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇬🇧 The Rape Gang Inquiry documents how police treated the victims. Fiona's case is one of the worst.

When Fiona's mother reported her missing and named her abusers, the call handler told her:

"You can't describe them as Asian men because that's racist. You should just be glad your child is being taught a different culture."

And it gets worse.

The report says a police officer once returned Fiona to the house where the abuse was happening and told the men to "have fun with her."

On another occasion, it says police told the abusers that if they could get Fiona to sign herself out of care, they'd stop bothering them.

The only formal action anyone took was a warning notice to the men. Nothing followed it.

Source: https://t.co/8QjK6cpXzz / Writer: Julie

[V T @SlipvonFreud]

@Rob_ThaBuilder This sounds like an elaborate operation that involved various local and higher up players and kick backs. RICO level network.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Those who knew must go to prison for a long time

[BlendrNews @BlendrNews]

France, the UK, Canada, and 11 others banned kids from social media at nearly the same time, with nearly the same law.

If your government actually answered to you, its laws wouldn't arrive on the same schedule as thirteen others.

[DiscomBob @BobDiscom]

@Jenny_1884 It's because they're all upstanding individuals, who never say anything that might incite others.😐