@SamCKx I notice in your replies to comments, you keep using "the best age-ID systems" as the basis for your conclusions.
Do you know how govt procurement works?🤣
Remember when authorities pushed lockdowns saying, "if we save one life, it's worth it"?
Why aren't they saying this about a quarter million children raped by Muslims in the UK?
Why berserk over lockdowns and masks, but now silent about a quarter million raped white girls?
It's interesting that for the 22 people killed by an refugee at the Manchester Arena we're told "don't look back in anger", but for Jo Cox, we're told to constantly look back in anger.
🚨 Massive news with worldwide repercussions!
The FTC, along with Alaska, Iowa, Nebraska, and Texas, have filed a lawsuit against the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), alleging the organization has provided the means for medical providers to make false and unsubstantiated claims to parents in order to sell pediatric medical transition services.
WPATH, an association of clinicians who profit from pediatric medical transition services, recommended medical interventions, including drugs and surgery, for children and adolescents who expressed dissatisfaction with or distress about their sex traits. In their complaint, the FTC and its state partners allege that these recommendations misled parents and children about the medical consensus and medical necessity, as well as the safety and effectiveness, of such services, in violation of the FTC Act.
"Today, the FTC filed a lawsuit against WPATH alleging that the organization made false and unsubstantiated claims regarding the necessity, effectiveness and safety of puberty blockers, hormones and sex-change surgeries," said Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson.
"Children, but especially their parents, must have complete and truthful information when making decisions to purchase medical services. For decades, the FTC has taken action against entities that make deceptive and unsubstantiated health-related claims. The complaint filed today reflects that same long-standing mandate: when an entity makes a claim about a medical treatment, the claim must be truthful, evidence-based and not misleading."
In 2022, WPATH omitted all mention of age limitations for breast amputation or penis removal from the "Standards of Care" document providing the organization's official recommendations for treating sex-trait-related dissatisfaction or distress in children.
As alleged in the complaint, WPATH did not base this decision on medical evidence.
As described in the complaint, in several instances, parents seeking help for their children were asked by clinicians whether they "would rather have a live daughter or a dead son," based on WPATH representations that pediatric medical transition services are "lifesaving." As the complaint argues, there is no competent and reliable scientific evidence to suggest these interventions reduce the risk of suicide.
WPATH claims its recommendations represent "consensus-based expert opinion." This leads WPATH members and other clinicians to repeat to consumers false, misleading or unsubstantiated statements about safety and efficacy found in WPATH guidelines, according to the complaint.
According to the complaint, despite the absence of competent and reliable scientific evidence, WPATH's guidelines label nearly every pediatric transition service as "medically necessary" to maximize the likelihood that insurers will pay for the pediatric transition procedures.
The charities were compromised
The police were compromised
The social services were compromised
The whole entire system needs tearing down piece by piece
The most vile and despicable people live amongst us
Nuremberg style trials must be done
This man’s adult son gang raped a 13 year old girl, and after you watch this video you will know exactly why.
There is no guilt. No remorse. In his mind, the victim is to blame - and in his country, she’d be dead in an honor killing.
That, too, is Islam.
The gangs raped the girls. Britain’s institutions didn’t just fail to stop it ... they kept supplying fresh victims for decades like it was standard procedure.
Police arrested the girls instead of the rapists. Social services dumped already-groomed kids back into the same houses where they were being passed around.
The NHS patched them up after they were raped with bottles and baseball bats, then sent them right back out the door. Schools watched older Muslim men collecting little white girls at the gates and punished the victims instead of the predators. Politicians from both parties looked at the numbers, the patterns, the fucking horror, and decided their seats and their precious “community relations” mattered more than stopping the industrial-scale rape of their own children.
250,000 girls. Minimum. Raped, trafficked, tortured, filmed, and in some cases shipped overseas. And the state didn’t just look away. It actively recycled them.
Every single checkpoint these kids hit fed them back into the machine. That’s not incompetence. That’s a system that decided the political cost of confronting Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs was higher than the cost of letting them keep operating.
The gangs were evil fucking monsters. But the British state made it scalable. They gave them impunity. They protected the narrative instead of the girls. And they did it for years while pretending this was just some unfortunate local problem.
Fuck that. This was state-enabled predation, plain and simple.
(article below)
Fantastic news! Surrey Pride was run by two child abusers until recently. It is now run by the men’s sexual partners. Despite promising to publish its review of safeguarding failures the organisation never has. Surrey Pride represents a clear and present danger to kids. 👇
Jayne Senior spent twelve years filing reports about the rape of children in Rotherham.
She ran the Risky Business outreach project from 1999 to 2011 and passed roughly 1,700 cases to police and social services.
She was told the girls were consenting. That they would make poor witnesses. That she was breaching the perpetrators' human rights. That she was being racist.
So in 2012 she handed more than 200 confidential documents to a newspaper.
That single act triggered the Jay inquiry, the Casey inspection, the removal of the council's leadership, and criminal investigations that continue today.
The system called her records "rubbish". History calls them evidence.
Why did saving children in Britain require an act of career suicide?
When I was training as a teacher in Leeds/Bradford in the 90s, I decided not to teach, it was common knowledge that the local Pakistanis came from a particular part of Pakistan that was impoverished and uneducated. These were the families whose daughters disappeared during the summer months never to return to school, shipped off to Pakistan and forced to marry a cousin. No-one discussed how to stop it or even a desire to. These were just how things were.
Same as the “child prostitutes” who didn’t come to school very often.
The teachers and education welfare officers I came into contact with were all the same. Just part of a system that didn’t care, didn’t occur to any of them that these girls deserved better.
Systems are made up of people, they don’t just occur. They are made by every decision each person makes.
🇬🇧 The Rape Gang Inquiry documents how police treated the victims. Fiona's case is one of the worst.
When Fiona's mother reported her missing and named her abusers, the call handler told her:
"You can't describe them as Asian men because that's racist. You should just be glad your child is being taught a different culture."
And it gets worse.
The report says a police officer once returned Fiona to the house where the abuse was happening and told the men to "have fun with her."
On another occasion, it says police told the abusers that if they could get Fiona to sign herself out of care, they'd stop bothering them.
The only formal action anyone took was a warning notice to the men. Nothing followed it.
Source: https://t.co/8QjK6cpXzz / Writer: Julie
France, the UK, Canada, and 11 others banned kids from social media at nearly the same time, with nearly the same law.
If your government actually answered to you, its laws wouldn't arrive on the same schedule as thirteen others.
@sharrond62 I'd love for just 1 media outlet to use the term "autogynophile" instead.
1. More people need exposed to the term to understand the sexualised motive behind womanfacing.
2. It would be interesting to see if any high-profile TRAs rush to object, given the crimes involved.
Why are certain MPs, unions & in fact any body who thinks it’s ok to allow men into intimate women’s spaces 👇🏼 cheering this on? Bad men will use bad laws to do bad things. It’s the whole point of safeguarding. This was just one day: over 60% of trans identifying men in prison (MOJ figures) are in prison for sexual assault (male prison population 18%) ..it’s a lie when proponents say males can simply say they are a woman, & it’s so, & this 👇🏼 is what they are insisting we play along with. Stop 🛑 removing our sex based rights. Stop putting the reality of women’s safeguards behind a few confused (or like these, dangerous) men. Laws must be based on facts not feelings. Sport on facts & science. Self professed ‘feelings’ are a perverts or pedophiles dream. Why are those cheering this on so utterly ignorant to this? Where is their basic critical thinking? Women are not support humans for males with a dysphoria (or fetish). We have our own rights. I will never understand women in particular prepared to throw them away after decades of fighting to get them.
Taking your kids phones and tablets away would be the best solution. Then this is limited to affecting only you and your kid(s) - as it should be. Having said that, I believe that it's up to you as the parent to figure out what works best for you and not offload that responsibility onto the government.