@ThierryBreton You could do something constructive and join up with the US - and the World - to enforce a viable two state solution, while outmaneuvering Hamas and reviving the UN from Obamas missteps.
Or you could make gestures enabling the likely upcoming genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.
@ElBaradei If she accepts it she is effectively neutralized, if she rejects it and instead condemns the institution awarding her as a blunt arm of NATO she can herald change.
@georgegalloway Covering Israeli cost for occupation while letting her extract revenue through her imperialism.
Simply shows how even someone like Galloway is brainwashed into being fully incapable of not supporting Israel.
@Megatron_ron Money to cover the cost for occupation, while letting Israel extract the money from the captured market.
It's funny how it's labelled as aid to Palestine.
@adamjohnsonCHI Calling it aggression - which it is given the 59 years of ongoing aggression against Palestine - is actually something you seem to avoid.
The distinction is very important, as it correctly nullifies any argument on "Israeli self-defence".
@AnnaSegerstedt "Sharp", as in still shipping weapons to the US and UK -both taking part in the conflict. Meaning they aren't even neutral but actively siding with the genocidal coalition.