@knoel1103@DrcharlieWardQ This is ideological nonsense dressed up as analysis. “More united than ever” is an absurd, unprovable claim, while dismissing Iran’s degraded military capability as “slight” is deliberately misleading. Iran’s ability to threaten the region matters not your political narrative.
@JayGenXer This gov't blew lower tariffs & chose political theatre. Autos7%, steel25%, & a 50% pause. They walked away & Canadians are left paying the price. This isn’t leadership. It’s reckless posturing dressed up as principle, with Canadian workers, businesses & families footing the bill
@DOGEQEEN Schumer is putting Democratic Party politics ahead of the clear preference of voters including a majority of Democrats who support citizenship verification. His refusal to support the SAVE Act looks less like representing voters and more like blocking a Trump political victory.
@EricLDaugh Talwani called the administration’s argument “cynical,” then kept her block in place while the dispute moves through the courts. Critics can reasonably ask whether this is legitimate judicial review or simply delaying election-security rules until time runs out. Appeals decide.
@MPelletierCIO This writer starts with legitimate criticisms, then leaps to “Canada is an unserious country” with no evidence. That’s not analysis it’s ideology dressed as fact. He doesn’t prove his conclusion; he simply assumes it, then cherry-picks facts to fit his worldview.
@Evelynne24 If Liberals insist Canadians must reject American influence and reduce dependence on the U.S. in the name of sovereignty, why does that principle suddenly disappear when it involves Carney’s own American ties, family, staff, and business interests? That’s the hypocrisy.
@JanssenJh Yes, 287(g) participation is voluntary, but Congress expressly authorized these agreements with state/local agencies. The issue is whether NY can prohibit agreements federal law authorizes. Saying the sheriffs will “rightfully lose” is an opinion, not a legal conclusion.
@GBC_Press Clickbait. The timeline is misleading. A judge has ordered DOJ to release or justify Epstein redactions, but there’s no evidence of a new 2 PM order or Trump rejecting it at 5 PM. U.S.-Iran fighting did resume, but U.S. strikes began Aug. 30—not 8 PM today.
@Nealb2010@TheBritishIntel Trump’s amendment strengthens and streamlines his case by withdrawing the financial-harm claims and focusing on reputational injury. The judge allowed the revised complaint, making the BBC’s original dismissal motion moot. The BBC must now challenge the amended case.
@warDaniel47 Real DOJ investigation, but this post turns a complicated funding inquiry into “Carroll is being criminally investigated for perjury” as established fact. Later reporting says the focus may be Hoffman’s funding network, not Carroll. That’s clickbait, not the full story.
@SBubkis@MarcNixon24 Trump’s team has long objected to Quebec’s French-language rules. But there’s no evidence removing product-labelling rules was a new last-minute demand. The documented final issue was digital discoverability. Lutnick is right on the narrow claim, not the broader one.
@SBubkis@MarcNixon24 The late U.S. objection concerned Canadian rules affecting French-language/Canadian digital content and its discoverability or prominence on streaming platforms. Not packaging.
@PeterVaupshas@TheBuckYouWill Trump imposed 50% tariffs. But spare me the outrage over protectionism: Canada has maintained supply management for decades, using tariffs of 200%–300%+ on dairy, poultry and eggs. You can oppose Trump’s tariffs without pretending Canada is a free-trade saint.
@QShadowWalker This is fabricated political CLICKBAIT, not a verified Trump statement. There is no evidence of a “Western Survival Pact,” a UK ultimatum, or Trump making this alleged Oval Office speech. Real immigration concerns exist, but inventing quotes undermines legitimate debate.
@wealthmoose Canada didn't fail to build the infrastructure because it was technically impossible. It made a series of economic, political and regulatory choices that made dependence on the U.S. seem acceptable until the geopolitical relationship became less predictable.
@ryangerritsen Ontario retailers are allowed to sell existing U.S. alcohol inventory. The LCBO confirms they can sell what they already have, although they cannot order new U.S. products. This store may have had existing stock from before the ban and is therefore allowed to sell it.
@wealthmoose Ontario retailers are allowed to sell existing U.S. alcohol inventory. The LCBO confirms they can sell what they already have, although they cannot order new U.S. products. This store may have had existing stock from before the ban and is therefore allowed to sell it.