My work looks closely at how people behave, interact, and make sense of their lives. I’m interested in the human experience with all its tensions, contradictions, and moments of clarity. Explore the latest pieces below.
https://t.co/T932ml3p8A
#writerscommunity#photography
@SDDonovan@ToniBourlon Don’t let a person’s reactions to a question make you feel stupid. Especially a negative reaction. I know it’s hard not to feel uncomfortable when someone dismisses you, but it is a reflection of them, not you. A prologue allows you to provide context w/o muddying your story.
If the Second Amendment does not apply to this exact kind of moment, what do people think it is for?
A citizen can lawfully carry, see masked federal agents beating someone in public, move toward the scene to help, and then get erased with a hail of bullets because “he had a gun.”
That excuse is an insult in a country where possession is legal by design, where the whole point is that the public never becomes a disarmed audience watching state power operate with impunity.
I’m not interested in arguing frame-by-frame footage. I’m interested in the principle that a free people cannot accept a standard where lawful carry becomes a death sentence the second authority feels threatened.
If that is the standard, then the 2nd Amendment has been reduced to a vibe. The founders did not write it so Republicans could do militia cosplay on weekends.