Parvez

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@tanpukunokami You have every right to say it, because the Islamic State of America dropped two N Bombs on two of your cities killing millions.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

Genz Girls,This is hilarious 😁😁😁

[Aparna @chhuti_is]

Advocate Shamim Ahmed, whose argument in the court stopped bulldozer action by the Bengal government was attacked today.

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

They are dividing us in the name of Hindu & Muslim and taking away our voting rights.

We must not let them divide us. We must all come together to save our country and our voting rights!

[Mohd Abdul Sattar @SattarFarooqui]

@abhijeet_dipke Go Gyanu Go

[Gabbar @Gabbar0099]

Vishal Dadlani on Tomorrow’s Protest. 🔥

Man with Spine ❤️🔥

[Priya Purohit @Priyaa_Purohit]

Bro cooked Sanghis on Gandhi Jayanti..🔥

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@smritiirani So you mean to say that all the 13 cr people left out of the final Voters list in 20 states are all Bangladeshis and Rohingyas.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@_shiblee Tell the Saudis to start defending the Palestinians instead of sucking Bibis balls , the ummah will then automatically fall in love with the Saudis.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@_A_khalifa And listen to the mass murderer and share the bed with them.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@KKRWeRule The fun part is that ECI is not releasing the data on how many Bangladeshis/ Rohingyas were detected 😁

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@Indian_Analyzer Respect a man who himself uses gutter language in his election rallies...50 cr ka girlfriend,didi o didi etc etc

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

🚨IMPORTANT NEWS🚨

Since Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is in the news, I have some very important but sad news to share about a Supreme Court judge.

Supreme Court judge Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. Just two months away from retirement.

If you remember, the Allahabad High Court had imposed a penalty on Medha Roopam, the DM of Noida and daughter of Gyanesh Kumar with a fine of five lakh rupees for irrationally issuing NSA order against a student Activist for Noida labour protest.

That order was challenged before the Supreme Court of India. Live Law, the news portal, reported that Gyanesh’s daughter’s case was listed before Justice Satish Chandra Sharma out of turn and in violation of the Supreme Court roster and rules and convention. The challenge ought to have gone before Justice Nagarathna’s bench, known to be an independent upright judge.

Two days back, when the matter was listed for hearing, Justice Sharma‘s bench switched off the audio of the Supreme Court proceeding, which is highly unusual and almost never done. ALARMING. There was no explanation from the judge’s side as to why this extraordinary favour was done for Gyanesh’s daughter.

In any case the fine and the adverse remarks of the Allahabad High Court were stayed by Justice Sharma immediately.

Same day, in another case related to Gyanesh Kumar—the constitutional challenge that was filed against the 2023 law on election commissioners of India was finally decided by a two judge bench of which Justice Sharma was a part of.

Under challenge was the appointments procedure where the leader of opposition today holds only an ornamental seat in the Three-member selection committee that selects Election commissioner of India. The other two are PM and his Cabinet Minister. Justice Sharma dissented which led to a split verdict and the case has now been sent before the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger bench. This has delayed the case by years probably. This split verdict itself came after three years. This is how the Supreme Court refuses to hear most important cases that affect our lives and the country.

A separate blanket immunity granted to past and present election commissioners of India by Modi’s government is also pending for last 9 months before CJI Surya Kant. Today, the Chief Election Commissioner has been exposed for gross illegalities and for stealing votes and elections at the behest of powers that be. Any sane, sorted, neutral, just person can see that the selection process of ECIs is not independent and tilted in govt’s favour. But not Justice Sharma.

And here’s the big news: his son holds not one, not two, but four big, plum government counsel panels, including income, tax department, GST, customs, and excise, and a Madhya Pradesh government lawyer panel. I need not explain the great perks and influence that come along when you hold such plum government panels. Read my Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma report where I exposed the same thing.

I am withholding the name of the son for now.

The important question is: how can a judge be expected to do impartial and fair Justice in politically sensitive cases if his family members serve at the pleasure of the government? The judge is also retiring two months later, and several lawyers have informed me that there are vacancies in NCLAT and other search plum tribunals.

I’M SORRY TO SAY such a system of judiciary does not inspire confidence in its ability to do impartial justice. There is a reason why the ethics code for judges require them to maintain a sense of aloofness and not do anything which can harm the their image and that of the judiciary.

Both in Justice Swarna Kanta’s case and several other judges case, including that of the Supreme Court, it is TRAGIC to notice the complete capture of the institution of the Indian judiciary. Can the judiciary go on like this?

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@jod_insane We stand with the CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
We don't stand with GYANESH KUMAR

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@RitikaChopra__ @Sydusm Thank you ma'am for doing your job with honesty and courage.More power to you.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@TheRebel_IN This should not be limited to a PC,all opposition parties along with CJP should be out on the streets till this SIR is scrapped.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@ANI Uncover his face ,the country needs to recognise this beast.

[Mohammed Zubair @zoo_bear]

Wow! So even @CeodelhiOffice @ECISVEEP didn't know that Chief Minister of Delhi @gupta_rekha was issued an SIR notice? They got to know only after we tweeted it? 🤔

Anyways, Now that ECI has clarified the SIR notice issued to Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta.

We identified her name in the notice list at around 3:30 PM today. Within a few hours, ERO releases a statement saying that her case had been verified and cleared for inclusion in the final electoral roll.

We welcome the clarification. However, a few questions remain:

Was the exact same procedure followed in this case as it would be for 32.27 lakh ordinary electors who received notices in Delhi?

• When was the notice issued and served to Rekha Gupta?
• What was the scheduled date of hearing/verification?
• When were the required documents submitted?
• When was the ERO/BLO verification conducted?
• Who disposed of the notice, and when?
• Was the case processed on an expedited basis?

• Are you saying, all this happened within a span of a few hours?

We request the ECI to disclose the actual workflow and timeline followed in this particular case, so there is complete transparency.

32.27 lakh ordinary electors have received SIR notices. Several Prominent electors have received notices.

Will the same urgency, verification process and procedural standards now be followed in their cases as well?

We are not making an allegation of preferential treatment.

We are simply asking for the same process, same scrutiny and same transparency for every elector in India.

[Parvez @BonnyBoy12]

@SauravDassss A massive protest against the CEC and the ECI is the need of the hour or else the democratic infrastructure of the country will be doomed.

[Congress @INCIndia]

Modi ji, have a spine. Stand up and roll back the UPI tax.