Boonee🥷

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

Australia cannot be self-reliant while relying on overseas refineries and imported fuel to keep our farms, trucks and food supply moving.

Every disruption overseas flows directly into higher costs for Australian families. A country that depends on foreign fuel is not energy secure, food secure or economically secure.

Without fuel self-reliance, Australia remains vulnerable to every international crisis.

Years of net-zero policies have contributed to the decline of domestic refining capacity and increased Australia's vulnerability to overseas fuel supply chains.

[Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 @TruthFairy131]

Aussies have every right to withhold taxes from their Government when they are sending OUR money overseas & to fund non-citizens.

We pay taxes in exchange for essential services, safety, security, protection of our rights, freedoms & civil liberties & social order NOT to give home loans to non-citizens & migrants that are now competing with Aussies.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH 😡

Aussies have no trust, faith or confidence in our Government.

They must be removed.

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Injective Mint will allow anyone to bring real-world asset issuance onchain with day-one utility.

Watch how institutions, users and AI agents can tokenize equities, ETFs, credit and real estate, then trade, borrow or use them as collateral.

RWAs made easy. Only on Injective.

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Native $INJ is officially live on @coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange.

Coinbase users can now trade INJ and move it directly into the Injective ecosystem through seamless deposits and withdrawals.

Unmatched access for $INJ is finally here.

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Today, we are introducing Injective Mint, a unified platform for issuing institutional-grade tokenized assets through a single interface with regulatory rails built in.

For the first time, users, institutions and AI agents can launch compliant onchain assets at scale on Injective.

Already, Injective has settled more than $6.8 billion in RWA volume while becoming one of the largest blockchains for tokenized assets, with more than $1.1 billion in native asset issuance. As Injective continues building regulated infrastructure, including its filing to become a registered transfer agent with the SEC, Injective Mint builds on that foundation to accelerate tokenization and expand the next generation of internet capital markets.

From equities, bonds, ETFs, international securities and FX to more complex financial products, issuers can launch assets with built in compliance controls, permissions and regulatory rails designed for institutional adoption.

Injective Mint enters private alpha today, with many more major releases, integrations and capabilities to follow powered by $INJ.

Read the thread below for a closer look at Injective Mint and see it in action 🧵

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Tokenization changes forever.

Tomorrow.

Powered by $INJ

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

We cannot keep going down the current path of mass migration.

[Boonee🥷 @boonchipch]

@BKBriefing @injective @RobinhoodApp_EU Great

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Injective is now one of the only major blockchains to have an official SEC Transfer Agent filing.

The news is making waves across publications everywhere as Injective gains institutional momentum as a U.S. regulated onchain layer for RWAs.

[Robinhood @RobinhoodApp]

New asset now available to trade on Robinhood Crypto.

$INJ (Injective Protocol)

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Injective has filed its transfer agent registration with the SEC, marking a major step towards becoming a leading blockchain with a regulated pathway to issue securities onchain.

This advances RWA market infrastructure in the New Internet Economy, right here in the US.

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Injective has now published its MiCA whitepaper, enabling Injective to expand its footprint across the EU with regulated rails.

This comes just after Injective filed with the SEC to become a registered transfer agent in the United States.

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

L O A D I N G ⏳⏳

[Boonee🥷 @boonchipch]

@HUSSIENFCB2 It was brilliant

[BroBro🇦🇺🏇🏻 @realRick_AUS]

“483,410 in the 12 months to May, the highest figure for the 12 months to May ever recorded”

All Labor does is lie.

You are being replaced, your living standards are diminishing by the day, and this Labor government keeps flooding Australia with immigrants.

[Injective 🥷 @injective]

Injective is officially a core member of the x402 Foundation under the @linuxfoundation alongside Google, AWS, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, Circle and major industry leaders.

We’re excited to help shape the future of internet-native payments for the agentic economy.

🧵

[TheCroatian @TheCroatian_]

🚨🇭🇷 NEW: Sportske Novosti have published the HNS letter sent to FIFA after the match against Portugal.

“Once again, this edition of the World Cup has demonstrated the global strength and popularity of football, making it all the more important that we remain committed to the fundamental values of our game—fairness, fair play, and the consistent application of the Laws of the Game to all national teams.

It is precisely because several controversial incidents during the tournament have prompted strong reactions around the world—from referees, media representatives, football experts, and the wider public—that we consider it necessary to address you in order to clarify the application of the Laws of the Game and FIFA's protocols in the refereeing decisions made during the World Cup Round of 32 match between Croatia and Portugal, played on 2 July 2026 in Toronto.

During the second half of that match, Croatia had three goals disallowed, all following delayed offside decisions. Furthermore, after a VAR intervention, Portugal was awarded a penalty kick that resulted in the equalising goal, even though the referee was in close proximity to the players, had a clear view of the incident, and did not consider the challenge sufficient to award a penalty. Consequently, the incident did not constitute a "serious missed incident." Given that it involved the kind of physical challenge routinely seen inside the penalty area in virtually every match, we are equally convinced that it could not reasonably have been regarded as a "clear and obvious error" by the referee. In other words, neither of the two fundamental criteria for a VAR review was met and, under the VAR Protocol, the VAR had neither the authority nor the obligation to invite the referee to conduct an on-field review.

Particularly controversial was referee Espen Eskås' decision in the 103rd minute to disallow Joško Gvardiol's goal for the alleged offside position of Mario Pašalić. In FIFA's official statement, it was explained that "Connected Ball Technology, embedded in the official match ball, detected a touch by Igor Matanović, allowing the referee to correctly award an offside offence and disallow Joško Gvardiol's goal."

At the same time, FIFA's official explanation of the offside law on its website states:

"Hair is considered a body part only if it affects the movement or trajectory of the ball. This is likely possible only in cases involving significant contact with a substantial amount of hair, for example a bun on top of the head."

It therefore remains unclear whether the referee disallowed Croatia's goal solely because Matanović may have touched the ball with a single strand of hair, or because he concluded that such contact affected the movement or trajectory of the ball—something that cannot in any way be inferred from the publicly available footage.

Moreover, all available video footage clearly shows that after passing Matanović's head, the ball did not change its direction, trajectory, speed, or rotation. In other words, he did not play the ball and therefore there could have been no offside offence. We consider it fundamentally wrong that an almost imperceptible vibration detected by a sensor can determine the outcome of a match of such importance.

We do not believe it serves football, its supporters, its players, its referees, the spirit of our game, or FIFA itself for technology to be trusted more than what is plainly visible to the human eye. As the reactions of people around the world—not only Croatian supporters—have demonstrated, virtually no one believes that Matanović touched the ball. When technology attempts to convince the public otherwise, it is entirely understandable that many describe such a decision as an "obvious robbery" or claim that "technology is destroying football." Such widespread negative reactions do nothing to enhance FIFA's reputation or strengthen public confidence in technological innovation. This is particularly unfortunate because we firmly believe that technology has an important and welcome role to play in football—but not in this manner.

The entire situation is further complicated by the following question: if the sensor data conclusively confirmed a touch and the VAR team definitively established the existence of an offside offence, why was the referee invited to review the incident on the pitch-side monitor at all? In such circumstances, this would have been a purely factual decision that the VAR is authorised to make independently. Conversely, if the referee was nevertheless called to conduct an on-field review, what exactly was he reviewing? Which specific video angles enabled him to conclude that Matanović touched the ball or affected its movement?

Furthermore, the available television footage clearly shows—through the data displayed at the bottom of the screen—that the "peak" indicating the alleged touch appears significantly before the ball reaches the Croatian attacker who is alleged to have touched it. Such footage simply cannot be regarded as sufficiently reliable evidence on which to base a decision of such significance. We therefore respectfully request that FIFA provide the Croatian Football Federation with the relevant footage from the VAR operations room so that we may determine why this "peak" appears before the ball had even come into the vicinity of Igor Matanović.

We are fully aware that no subsequent interpretation of these events can alter the outcome of the match against Portugal, a national team that we respect and congratulate on qualifying for the Round of 16.

However, given that football matches—and especially the FIFA World Cup—are followed with immense passion and emotion by billions of people around the world, we believe it is essential to further strengthen confidence in refereeing, particularly with regard to the criteria and methods governing the application of modern technology, so that it cannot be misapplied or used contrary to its intended purpose. Everything that occurred during this match, and especially the final offside decision, generated enormous dissatisfaction among football supporters around the world, thereby harming the game during this historic FIFA World Cup.

We therefore consider it appropriate for FIFA to conduct a thorough review of all the controversial incidents from this match and to provide comprehensive explanations of the refereeing decisions that had a decisive impact on the outcome of this Round of 32 fixture. Although such explanations cannot restore Croatia's opportunity to pursue another great achievement on football's biggest stage during Luka Modrić's extraordinary international career, we sincerely hope that similar unjust and fundamentally unfootballing decisions—in which a sensor becomes more important than what is visible to the human eye—will be prevented in the future through clearer protocols and improved procedures.

Unfortunately, decisions of this nature cause immense disappointment among football supporters—from Croatian fans in the stadium to football lovers, media representatives, commentators, and the wider public across the globe. We firmly believe that such situations can be avoided in the future, and it is precisely for that reason that we have chosen to address you in this manner, fully aware that no explanation can lessen the tears, sadness, and disappointment of our players and supporters.

In light of all the above circumstances, we respectfully ask that you give careful consideration to the questions and proposals we have presented.”

[Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 @TruthFairy131]

MUSLIMS are responsible for the Hundreds of fire bombings in Melbourne. 25 fire bombings in just the past few weeks.

Also this week, Police conducted massive raids against Pakistani grooming gangs accused of targeting WHITE women, girls & children.

Several suspects have been arrested.

This has been happening all over Australia for years.

Meanwhile the Labor Government is focused on ‘Islamophobia’ which is just Aussies speaking about the horrific behaviour of Muslims.

This ideology is incompatible with Australia, these people have caused nothing but terror & horror in our nation.

They do this everywhere they go.

Enough is enough.

[Melinda Richards 🇦🇺🇺🇸 @goodfoodgal]

Share this everywhere

[Dr Russell McGregor @KillAuDeepState]

Why is Australia importing millions from India❓

The housing crisis means young Aussies can’t afford rent.

Entry-level jobs are taken and wages lowered.

This is pricing our next generation out of their own country.

Time to put Aussies first❗️ 🇦🇺