@Elizabe58474310 Oh, yeah — I’m sure the evolutionary significance of faces with respect to both communication (verbal and non-verbal) and respiration will succumb to the whims of a small, but persistent, tribe of factually-challenged, self-righteous hypochondriacs.
Your child must wear a mask that doesn’t work to stop a virus less serious to them than historical respiratory risks until they can get a vaccine they dont need that fails to prevent transmission to teachers/parents who have already been vaccinated anyway
Is that where we’re at?
You can be in favour of something, but opposed to it being mandatory.
You can be against something, but not in favour of it being banned.
Smart people understand this.
I really am coming around to the idea of vaccine passports and the alluring promise of Government provided safety whenever I leave my home.
Why just stop at keeping the dirty diseased unvaccinated out of civilised society though?
There is so much more we can do.
Dear vaccine passport proponents
When you hand the Government the power to expel people from society for not partaking in whatever flavoured scheme, it won't be too much further down the line that you will find yourself facing expulsion for something that you don't support.
There is no general moral obligation to stay isolated in your house because you might, unbeknownst to you, be carrying an infectious pathogen that might cause someone to get sick and die. If there were, you could never rightly leave your house. 1/5