@overworke@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive No, the "grooming argument" doesn't only work on minors, because grooming isn't something that only applies to children, nor is it exclusively sexual abuse.
I literally just said that.
@overworke@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive If he overheard Diddy talking to D-Roc, then Cassie's texts mean fuck all to the conversation w/ D-Roc.
If he overheard Diddy talking to Cassie (probably not), then they definitely do matter.
If he's making it up, we won't know until the other person takes the stand.
@overworke@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive One thing that could back him up would be testimony from the person Diddy was talking to that was "overheard."
Cassie's texts ARE evidence of conversations she had w/ Diddy, yes, but they do not have any impact on THIS alleged verbal convo.
@overworke@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive Grooming doesn't just apply to kids, it applies to anyone who is particularly vulnerable to a power imbalance. It also isn't exclusive to sexual abuse either.
Unfortunately children are the most common victims of it.
@overworke@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive I know - they won't be good enough for this particular conversation.
Diddy texts w/ Cassie mean literally nothing when it comes to this supposed convo the assistant overheard between Diddy and someone else.
@overworke@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive I think this particular conversation you'd have to go to the source for over the text messages bc it was a verbal convo.
Like, whoever Diddy was talking to, who was it and can we get them to testify as to whether or not he actually said that?
@innercitypress@MatthewLeeICP@sdnylive Ok...
But WHO was Diddy talking to and can they be called/re-called to testify about what was said in that convo?