Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
I have learned some interesting things about Protestantism from watching Trent Horn @Trent_Horn debate Protestants over the past few months.
First, according to Taco Talks, @taco_talks, a person may goon while fantasizing about his spouse, and God considers it morally acceptable.
Second, according to Ryan, @needGod_net, sodomy between a husband and wife cannot be condemned outright because that specific scenario is not explicitly addressed in Scripture.
Finally, Ryan agreed that, apart from apostasy, there is no number or kind of sins a person can commit that will prevent him from entering heaven, provided he continues trusting in Jesus for salvation.
Protestants, are these men correctly applying Protestant principles?
If they are, then Protestantism is not a religion ordered toward self-denial, repentance, and holiness. It is a self-centered system that accommodates the flesh while guaranteeing heaven.
That would mean that the conclusions of the individuals above are the predictable fruit of that system: redefine immoral acts as permissible, deny that grave and unrepentant sin can cost a person salvation, and assure the sinner that continued trust without repentance is enough.
Muslim Icon #LilyJay (Lily Jay) turned out to be a scammer, with a history of her husband and her stealing money. #WhoHadThunkThat 😂😂😂
And she even started involving her daughter in it. Family Affair #Ahmadullah
Was her conversion a fraud too?
Fr. Ripperger: “Demons can manipulate our emotions. This is why in the entire history of Catholic spiritual theology, every single Saint has warned against following our emotions in our spiritual life. Because God's not the only one who broadcasts on that channel.”
@onedaysomehow_@farmingandJesus@riecker What about babies? Have they sinned??
What about the righteous and blameless people in the Bible if no one can be good? What about the good works we do? (Eph 2:10)
Yep Jesus is our sin OFFERING to the Father. Or do you really want to say that Jesus=sin??
@needGod_net A Catholic who knows what it means to be a Catholic and knows what Holy Mass is, and still willfully rejects going to Mass despite knowing FULL WELL that it is a sin, is in rebellion against God and has broken his friendship with God. It's not that hard to understand!
@onedaysomehow_@farmingandJesus@riecker Did Jesus sin? Have Newborns sinned?
Could the Apostles do things only God can do; sharing His goodness with us by His grace?
Can the Church, built by Christ and guided into all truth by the Holy Spirit, make authoritative and binding statements?