@SniffRocks Fair on the tariff benefit, but sub revenue and paying circles are the more important metrics for the thesis on this one, and they were positive.
I’d still call it a good quarter, albeit with H2 execution risk.
Life360 (360) had a strong Q2, but the call felt a bit meh. FY26 guidance is heavily weighted to H2, yet management offered little quantitative evidence to support the expected MAU reacceleration when pressed on it.
Looking like it’ll open 25% lower, this could become a buying opportunity if H2 delivers, but the call didn't exactly fill me with confidence.
Life360 (360) had a strong Q2, but the call felt a bit meh. FY26 guidance is heavily weighted to H2, yet management offered little quantitative evidence to support the expected MAU reacceleration when pressed on it.
Looking like it’ll open 25% lower, this could become a buying opportunity if H2 delivers, but the call didn't exactly fill me with confidence.
$CAR FY26: Solid result with FY27 guidance above consensus. Revenue/EBITDA broadly in line, but NPAT +3.6% vs cons.
FY27 midpoint implies ~2% rev, 1% EBITDA and 4% NPAT upside to consensus.
Strong international growth, with pricing and depth penetration. AI continuing to be a tailwind rather than a disruption.
(Held)
Short-term noise, long-term fundamentals. My thoughts on why ResMed's $RMD margin concerns look temporary and why $REA remains one of the ASX's highest-quality compounders.
https://t.co/z1sLIk2cL8
The market came into $REA worried about a housing transaction cliff.
Management just guided to flat to low single-digit listing declines, low double-digit Buy yield growth, and mid single-digit cost growth. That's a very different outlook to the bearish FY18-19 comparison many were using.
Looks supportive of earnings upgrades, with current FY27 consensus (+6.2% revenue, +13% NPAT) looking conservative.
@ryu_tay Who knows in this market. They’re ahead of consensus so will get some earnings upgrades and it’s not expensive.
In before it’s down 12% today 😂
Am I the only one that finds the $MGH/Firmus relationship a little strange?
Invest hundreds of millions into Firmus, mark the investment up through earnings, then receive an $855m contract from Firmus.
I’m sure it’s all above board, but there’s a fair bit of circularity here… 🧐