You cannot be serious

🇬🇧

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@IanMcDo68808105 @lembitopik We're done with listening.

We need action. And it isn't going to happen.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@IanMcDo68808105 @lembitopik Once here they are dug in like ticks on a hound. They will be impossible to 'boot out'.

The only possible reason we allow it is because it is part of a plan. It iterally makes no sense otherwise.

Wake up !!!!

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@IanMcDo68808105 @lembitopik Those who are rejected will come anyway. They are not interested in our 'approval'.

They don't care what we think. They know they'll get the full red carpet treatment regardless.

The French don't want the ones we reject either.

Physical pushback is the ONLY solution.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@IanMcDo68808105 @lembitopik These people decide they want to come here. They are not interested in waiting until we assess whether they 'qualify'.

90% of the 40,000 illegals so far this year wouldn't qualify. They are economic migrants. So they come anyway as they know we are too weak to stop them.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@IanMcDo68808105 @lembitopik They are crossing by boat now because they know they have no chance of qualifying for asylum if assessed remotely.

And we are currently incapable of instant deportation.

Stop The Boats means literally stopping the boats. Not trying nicely to dissuade people.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@IanMcDo68808105 @lembitopik Are you suggesting that there is no possible way we can protect our borders?

Good job we didn't have that attitude in the period 1939-1945.

There are literally dozens of ways the boats can be stopped.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@dontdelay @docbankholiday @the_tpa 2 of 2

You said "most benefit recipients DESERVE the money". You didnt say "most benefit recipients HAVE A RIGHT TO the money".

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@dontdelay @docbankholiday @the_tpa 1 of 2

Having a right to something is a legal or contractual claim guaranteed by rules or society, whereas deserving something is a moral or merit-based assessment of your virtue, actions, effort, or character.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@dontdelay @docbankholiday @the_tpa 'Having a right to something' and 'deserving it' are not the same thing.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@DrHoenderkamp With any luck, their advice in EVERY constituency will be 'Vote Restore Britain'.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@LeilaniDowding Weird behavior by the establishment.

It's almost as though they are hoping that, by facilitating this, they are going to be eaten last...

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@Artemisfornow It's not the votes that count.

It's the person who counts the votes.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@LansdellBilly @MahyarTousi Not any more we don't. We persecute patriots, annoy our allies, force inject the weak, are as corrupt as a banana republic and can't use the weapons without third party approval.

And we set the mould for creating an empire which has backfired spectacularly.

We are a shambles.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@LansdellBilly @MahyarTousi They leave the Swedes alone. They leave the Spanish and Portuguese alone. They leave the Argentinians, Brazilians and New Zealanders alone. They leave the Swiss alone and the Irish alone and the Icelanders alone.

Perhaps it's us?

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@LansdellBilly @MahyarTousi I don't know much about Russians other than that they are best left alone and are definitely not to be fucked with.

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@LansdellBilly @MahyarTousi Stolen from another thread:

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@AvonandsomerRob If everyone who voted Reform had instead voted Restore then Labour would have lost to Restore.

So there's that....

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@GoodwinMJ I was a Reform voter because of Rupert Lowe. Now I'm a Restore voter because of Rupert Lowe.

Reform voters like Rupert Lowe. Restore voters like Rupert Lowe.

Can you see the common denominator....?

[You cannot be serious @boycat22]

@PatrinMaddison @MichaelJRic @dontdelay @Conservatives I have no objection to it being changed. I can see an argument that it isn't sustainable.

If Burnham was saying "we have a debt crisis and we have to start making economies" then okay.

But "we're going to spend the savings on other things and keep wasting money" is not okay.