boyega

[boyega @boyega_1]

Thank you Jesus

[boyega @boyega_1]

I TRUST JESUS!

[YOM🗣️ @ThaBoyYom]

You’re nothing but a pure and applied ekuke

[boyega @boyega_1]

A thief and more!

You understand men and women aren't the same only when it comes to paying bills while you take the back sit to love and respect 😂.

[Apunanwu ✨ @soma___chi]

Men and women are not the same, and I don’t believe they have to be.

Once I see that you’re trying to reverse roles, I naturally distance myself because that’s not the kind of dynamic I want.

Even in a relationship, I’m not a man, and I don’t intend to take on a man’s role. I don’t believe in 50/50 when it comes to finances. I can buy things for the house with my own money, give gifts, and contribute willingly, but I will not take over a man’s responsibility as a provider. My own role is to support him, make him feel valued, loved, respected, and appreciated.

There’s a difference between supporting a man and taking over his responsibilities. I know the kind of relationship I want, and I’m not going to compromise on that just to fit into someone else’s idea of a relationship.

[OurFaveOnlineDoc 🇬🇧 🇳🇬 @OurFavOnlineDoc]

His role is to “be a provider”.
Not abstract, not imaginary, not intangible, not invisible.

But your role is to “make him feel valued, loved, respected, and appreciated.” Very abstract, very imaginary, very invisible and very intangible qualities.

This is AbokiFx exchange rate.

[Jet Daniel 🛩️ @LaceVine]

This tweet was made 10 years ago. She has used all her youthfulness to follow sugar daddies and married men.

Now she finds it weird that men in their 30s are dating women in their early twenties. The duality of man.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Mon post sur Hitler et l'extrême droite a fait des millions de vues. Visiblement, le sujet touche un nerf. Alors aujourd'hui, je vais vous expliquer, par A + B, pourquoi la notion de « far right » telle qu'on l'utilise en France n'a à peu près aucun sens. Et pourquoi ceux qui la brandissent sont souvent les derniers qui devraient donner des leçons.

Commençons par la seule question qui compte : qu'est-ce qui fait qu'un système politique marche ou ne marche pas ? En très grande partie, c'est l'économie. Un pays qui produit de la richesse, qui laisse ses citoyens créer, échanger, entreprendre, tient debout. Un pays qui détruit ça s'effondre, peu importe la beauté de ses slogans.

Et en économie, il n'y a au fond que deux grandes visions du monde.

La première, c'est le collectivisme. L'idée que l'État sait mieux que vous. Qu'il doit planifier la production, fixer les prix, diriger les entreprises, décider ce que vous gagnez, ce que vous achetez, et à la fin ce que vous pensez. L'individu n'est qu'un rouage au service d'un grand projet collectif : la classe, la nation, la race, le peuple.

La seconde, c'est la liberté. Le capitalisme, la propriété, la liberté individuelle, la responsabilité individuelle. L'idée que des millions de personnes qui créent de la valeur les unes pour les autres produisent infiniment plus de prospérité qu'un bureau de planificateurs, aussi brillants soient-ils.

Maintenant, regardez la liste des grands régimes totalitaires du XXe siècle. Staline : planification intégrale, collectivisation forcée, des millions de morts. Mao : le Grand Bond en avant et la plus grande famine de l'histoire humaine. Pol Pot : abolition de la monnaie, vidage des villes, près d'un quart de la population cambodgienne exterminée. Mussolini, l'inventeur du mot fascisme : « Tout dans l'État, rien hors de l'État, rien contre l'État. » Et Hitler, à la tête du Parti national-socialiste des travailleurs allemands, dont le programme proclamait « l'intérêt général avant l'intérêt particulier ». Il a soumis toute l'économie allemande aux plans de l'État : plan de quatre ans, gel des prix et des salaires, syndicats dissous dans un front du travail unique, industriels qui produisaient ce que le régime décidait.

Leurs drapeaux étaient différents. Leurs ennemis désignés étaient différents. Mais la mécanique était la même : l'individu n'existe pas, seul le collectif compte, et l'État décide de tout.

Pourquoi est-ce que ça finit toujours en totalitarisme ? Parce que le collectivisme ne marche pas. Et quand un système ne marche pas, il n'a que deux options : reconnaître son échec ou forcer les gens. Ils choisissent toujours la force.

Ludwig von Mises l'a démontré dès 1920 : sans prix libres, sans marché, un planificateur ne peut tout simplement pas savoir quoi produire, en quelle quantité, ni à quel coût. Il navigue à l'aveugle. L'économie planifiée n'est pas une version moins efficace du marché, c'est une impossibilité.

Friedrich Hayek en a tiré la conséquence politique en 1944 dans La Route de la servitude, un livre qu'il a dédié « aux socialistes de tous les partis ». Un chapitre s'intitule « Les racines socialistes du nazisme ». Un autre, « Pourquoi les pires arrivent au pouvoir ». Pour Hayek, contrôler l'économie, ce n'est pas contrôler un secteur parmi d'autres, c'est exercer « le contrôle des moyens de toutes nos fins ». Celui qui contrôle votre pain contrôle votre vie. Puis votre parole. Puis votre pensée.

Milton Friedman l'a résumé à sa façon : une société qui place l'égalité avant la liberté finit sans l'une ni l'autre.

On sait donc exactement ce qui marche. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est un siècle d'expériences grandeur nature. Il faut écouter l'école autrichienne, Mises, Hayek, et Friedman à Chicago avec eux : liberté économique, État limité, responsabilité individuelle.

Et c'est là qu'on arrive à l'inversion accusatoire. Une partie de la presse de gauche passe son temps à crier au fascisme. Pourquoi ? Parce que le fantasme du fascisme est le meilleur moyen de ne jamais parler du bilan de ses propres idées. Au fond, ils le savent : si leur programme collectiviste était appliqué jusqu'au bout, il ne marcherait pas, parce qu'une économie collective ne peut pas marcher. Et une économie qui ne marche pas finit toujours par devoir contraindre, surveiller, interdire. C'est-à-dire par devenir exactement ce qu'ils prétendent combattre. Les vrais héritiers de la logique totalitaire ne sont pas ceux qu'on désigne du doigt.

Alors qui traite-t-on d'« extrême droite » en 2026 ? Des gens qui veulent des villes safe. Des gens qui veulent garder leur culture. Des gens qui veulent simplement vivre une vie paisible, élever leurs enfants et ne pas avoir à barricader leur commerce tous les week-ends. Des gens qui veulent que la loi s'applique à tous.

Si ça, c'est l'extrême droite, alors le mot ne veut plus rien dire. Et c'était peut-être le but.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

“He jailed socialists, so he wasn’t a socialist.”

This is the argument every single person in my replies thinks is a mic drop. It’s actually the weakest one available, and it collapses in five seconds.

Lenin banned the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries. Both were socialist parties. By your logic, Lenin wasn’t a socialist.

Stalin shot Bukharin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and sent an ice axe through Trotsky’s skull. All of them were founding fathers of the Bolshevik revolution. By your logic, Stalin wasn’t a socialist.

Mao purged Liu Shaoqi, the President of the People’s Republic, and let him die in a cell. Pol Pot murdered his own cadres by the thousands. Robespierre sent Danton to the guillotine, then got the guillotine himself.

There’s a reason Vergniaud said the Revolution, like Saturn, devours its own children. Purging rival socialists isn’t evidence against collectivism. It’s one of its most reliable signatures.

Why? Because when the state decides everything, there can only be one plan. Two factions with two plans for the same economy can’t coexist. One has to disappear. In a free society, disagreements get settled by markets and elections. In a planned society, they get settled by the secret police. Hitler crushing the SPD and the KPD, then murdering Röhm and Strasser in his own party, is exactly what you’d predict from a regime competing for the same thing: total control of the economy and of society.

And that’s the real question. Not “what did he call himself” and not “who did he arrest”. The question is: who runs the economy? Under the Nazis, independent unions were abolished and replaced by a state labor front. Prices and wages were frozen by decree. Investment was directed by a Four-Year Plan. Private property existed on paper, as long as owners did exactly what the state told them to do.

Hayek saw this in real time. He dedicated The Road to Serfdom “To the socialists of all parties” precisely because he understood that the planners of the left and the planners of the right were the same species. Collectivism isn’t a color on the political spectrum. It’s the belief that a central authority can and should direct the economy. Once you accept that, the purges, the camps and the one-party state aren’t accidents. They’re the operating manual.

So no, “he jailed communists” doesn’t refute anything. Communists jailed communists for seventy years.

Read Hayek. Then come back.

[Aluya_pov @AluyaPov]

Please listen to this and learn well

[Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo @ezekieldachomo0]

YOU ARE INVITED TO MY RETIREMENT SERVICE

[Alaga! @Hon_Danjo]

If it is an hospital around Mokola you did the test. They didn’t accidentally switch anything. It’s a racket. They will tell you you have HIV. Then out of fear, you will ask what can be done. They will tell you there is a supplement that can help. Thats where the extortion will start. Then they will tell you there is a cure. That’s when the real extortion will start. You cannot tell anybody. Soo you keep paying.

It is an old playbook.

When they don chop you wella, they can even introduce a cure to you for let’s say 10m or 15m. Once you pay, they give you pain reliever or any nonsense drug. And ask you to go do test somewhere else. That’s where you will know you don’t have any HIV again. You will still even call them and be thanking them even after they don scam you.

Same gimmick for penis enlargement creams and all. If you buy penis enlargement cream, you cannot call out the person that sold it to you that it didn’t work.

Welcome to my scam 101 Ted talk. 😅

[publikphigor @publikphigor]

This is what Peter Obi means by reducing the cost of governance.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

It's been months that I keep saying Hitler was far left. Every time, thousands of clowns show up in my replies to give me history lessons.

So I made a video to answer all these low IQ takes at once.

Topic closed. Next.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BREAKING: NY Post just released a 1997 marriage certificate that lists the father of Ilhan Omar's sister as "Nur Said ELMI," the SAME last name as the man Omar married — HER BROTHER

It's over.

Omar's late father, Nur Omar Mohamed, also went by "Nur Said Elmi."

In a filing this week, the DOJ referred to the congresswoman herself as "Ilhan Nur Said Elmi."

OMAR IS NOT HER REAL NAME.

When she was asked directly whether she's related to Ahmed Elmi, she said: "Not to my knowledge" 🤡

She must forfeit her seat.

[God centered ministries Uganda @UgandaCentered]

“WHEN JESUS RETURNS, THERE WILL BE NO SECOND CHANCE!” — JÉRÉMY DOKU REPORTEDLY SHARES HIS ETERNAL GOAL

[Trad West @trad_west_]

He was broke and in debt. He prayed to God for help. Hours later, unexpected checks arrived in his mailbox.

Three months later, he was cast as Jesus in The Chosen.

[Trad West @trad_west_]

The Lord's prayer in aramaic, the language of Jesus.

By Jonathan Roumie, who plays Jesus in the Chosen.

[Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo @ezekieldachomo0]

A MAN BATTLING CANCER, SITTING IN A GRAVE WITH THE BODIES OF HIS MURDERED FLOCK — HOW MUCH MORE PAIN CAN ONE HEART BEAR? 💔😭

Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo, a man already battling liver cancer, sat on Saturday inside a freshly dug mass grave, surrounded by the lifeless bodies of four people a father and his three sons. They were not strangers to him. They were members of his congregation. They were part of his spiritual family. They were souls he had prayed for, loved, and shepherded.

Now, they were gone.

Imagine the pain of a father watching another father and his three sons being laid to rest, knowing that their lives were cut short while they slept. Imagine sitting beside their lifeless bodies, wondering how many more innocent people must die before the world finally listens.

Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo was not crying for himself. He was crying for the living. He was crying for the members of his congregation who are still alive but must sleep every night with the fear that they could be the next victims. He was mourning the dead while worrying about those who might never live to see another morning.

And what makes this even more heartbreaking is that he is carrying this burden while fighting his own battle with cancer.

Who comforts the man who spends his days comforting the brokenhearted? Who wipes away the tears of a pastor who has watched his own people buried one after another? Who stands beside a shepherd whose flock is being slaughtered?

Plateau State is bleeding. Christian communities are grieving. Families are being shattered, children are losing their fathers, and mothers are burying their children. Behind every grave is a story, behind every lifeless body is a family, and behind every name is a future that has been stolen.

Those responsible for these attacks must be held accountable. The victims deserve justice, the survivors deserve protection, and the families left behind deserve more than words of sympathy.

When innocent people are killed in their sleep, we must not allow their suffering to disappear beneath the noise of politics, indifference, or convenient explanations.

Please, do not look away.

Do not scroll past their pain as though these lives meant nothing. Do not wait until another family is wiped out before you raise your voice.

Today, it is a father and his three sons. Tomorrow, another family may be mourning their loved ones.

How many more graves must be dug? How many more children must become orphans? How many more pastors must weep over the bodies of their own congregation before the world pays attention?

We are not asking for revenge. We are asking for justice. We are asking for protection. We are asking for the right to live without the constant fear of being killed in our own homes.

May God comfort every grieving family in Plateau State, strengthen Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo in his battle with cancer, and grant protection to those who are still living in fear.

PLEASE, LET THE WORLD HEAR THEIR CRY. DO NOT LOOK AWAY. 💔😭

[iDAN 🦸🏽 @dangbanamanager]

We’ve negotiated and told terrorists to stop killing people during the day, so Nigerians should stop travelling after 9 p.m.!” — Tinubu’s spokesperson, @aonanuga1956, speaking for APC government.

[boyega @boyega_1]

Scientist created the ideal dance moves to attract women.

['Fisayo Soyombo @fisayosoyombo]

On @NewsCentralTV today for a conversation on my latest investigation, ‘Europe Through the Desert and the Mediterranean Sea’, I recalled how Arab traffickers stopped a Nigerian migrant from pausing to drink water after being forced to work as a manual labourer against his will.

I also spoke about 'Desserts from the Desert', my photo exhibition scheduled to be held at Alliance Française in Ikoyi, Lagos, next Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

[OLOBA THE ARTIST @IamOloba_]

For the Safety of My Family!

Good evening, everyone, and to anyone who reads this. Something happened today, and the reason I’m making this post is that it happened at my home, where my family lives. It’s our house, and my family’s safety is paramount to me!

Today, October 21, around 8pm, I had a back-and-forth with an @inDrive rider. Here’s what happened.

I was at the Island, where I went to see my very good friend, who had lost his dad. I tried to use Bolt to book a ride, but it was busy. I don’t use inDrive, so my friend booked a ride for me.

The inDrive fare was 25,100, and I accepted! MR. CHARLES ETIM BASSEY called me and asked where I was headed. I told him Ayobo. Then, in his words, MR. BASSEY said that if I was going with the AC on, I would pay 30,000, and if I was going without AC, we would stick with the 25,100.

I said okay. When he arrived, he wanted to turn on the AC. I told him I didn’t need it because I wasn’t feeling well and would throw up. Plus, since it was already evening, I’d rather just use the natural air.

THE AC WASN’T ON! My friend asked if I used the AC, and I said no, although there were the usual hold-ups, etc. I got home, and my friend, who had ordered the ride, sent 28,000 to account for the hold-up.

MR. CHARLES ETIM BASSEY created a scene at my family’s house, and other landlords came out. He went ahead and took pictures of our house, sent them to a group chat, and said, in his words, “This is the house.” I picked up my phone, too, and took pictures of him and his car.

He asked inDrive to provide the call recording, and I told him that if the recording contradicted my account, I would pay 32,000. He didn’t provide the recording and kept creating a scene. My friend called and explained the same thing to the other landlords.

Why am I putting this out here? This is my family’s house, and their safety is paramount to me!

IF ANYTHING HAPPENS TO MY HOUSEHOLD OR OUR HOUSE, MR. CHARLES ETIM BASSEY, AN INDRIVE RIDER, SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE!

This is his car and his picture.
Thank you.