Brad

[Brad @bradsaudit]

Has anyone ever told you the truth?
https://t.co/D0mzhF3ZDp

[The General @GeneralMCNews]

BREAKING: The Chief Exorcist of Washington has been fired for his statements about demons and UFOs, claiming that demons can disguise themselves as aliens, glowing orbs, and UFOs.

[redpillbot @redpillb0t]

In the 80s&90s, Al Bundy was considered fat and poor. Let that sink in.

[Rodney @cryptojourneyrs]

End of an era. Here’s some of your greatest hits.

RIP Spirit Airlines 🪦

[Javier Negre @javiernegre10]

How many times did Barack Hussein have an assassination attempt?

How many times did Joe Biden have an assassination attempt?

How many times did Kamala Harris have an assassination attempt?

How many times did Hillary Clinton have an assassination attempt?

The answer is 0, the Democrats are the party of violence in America.

[Michael Knowles @michaeljknowles]

Political violence is not a “both-sides” problem. It’s also not a fringe problem. It comes from the mainstream Left.

[Tim Pool @Timcast]

The Lone Star tick is spreading rapidly and can make you allergic to beef!

The Good News is that thanks to billions in lab grown meat investment an alternative can be grown that won't trigger the allergy

What a perfect coincidence!

[Brad @bradsaudit]

@michaeljknowles Probably a word for her. Hope you said it.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

[RSBN 🇺🇸 @RSBNetwork]

WATCH: Melania Trump Suggests Using Humanoid Robots as Teachers Moving Forward - 03/25/26

[Brad @bradsaudit]

@rabbriansamuel Welcome to the family!

[Brad @bradsaudit]

Persistent Influence Theory: A Hierarchical Framework for Structural Persuasion and Information Fidelity @SSRN https://t.co/JSGcKNtLuz

[Ricardo @Ric_RTP]

Elon Musk just said money will be IRRELEVANT soon.

He sat down at the Abundance Summit yesterday and explained how the entire concept of currency disappears.

Here's why and his exact timeline:

Elon says the global economy will 10x in the next 10 years.

We'll have a base on the moon. People on Mars. Mass drivers launching cargo off the lunar surface.

Sounds insane until you hear his math.

AI and robots are about to increase economic output by so many orders of magnitude that we literally cannot comprehend it.

His exact framework:

Take ALL of Earth's current electricity usage. Now multiply it by a million. That's still only a millionth of the sun's total energy output.

The scale of what's coming makes our current economy look like a lemonade stand.

But here's where it gets really crazy:

Elon says at roughly 1,000x the current economy, something breaks.

Not the markets or the system...

Human desire itself.

At 1,000x, AI and robots have already produced everything any human could ever want. Every product. Every service. Every experience.

You literally cannot think of something to ask for that hasn't already been made.

AI runs out of things to do for us.

So what does it do next?

It starts building for ITSELF.

AI producing for AI. Robots manufacturing for robots. Intelligence expanding for the sake of intelligence.

Humans don't get destroyed in this scenario. We just stop being the point.

We become passengers in a civilization we built but no longer drive.

And that's WHEN money dies.

Elon said: "AI will really not use human currency. It will just care about power and mass, wattage and tonnage."

Not dollars. Not Bitcoin. Not gold.

Raw energy and raw materials.

That's the new economy. And humans aren't the customers.

The irony is almost poetic.

Elon is saying this while becoming the world's first trillionaire. His net worth is a number so large it's meaningless to most people.

And he's telling you that number is about to be meaningless to EVERYONE.

He puts the probability of this future at 80% or HIGHER.

The 20% downside? He won't say exactly. Just that "not all outcomes are great" and we need to be careful.

Which is Elon-speak for: if this goes wrong, it goes VERY wrong.

But he's betting on the 80%.

He says we'll have universal high income. Not universal basic income. HIGH income.

Just issued directly to people because the output of goods and services will so far exceed the money supply that everything deflates to near zero.

Everything gets cheaper. Then free. Then abundant beyond comprehension.

And then money just... stops mattering.

Most people hear this and think it's utopia.

But think about what he's actually saying:

Your career. Your savings. Your retirement plan. Your investment portfolio. The entire system you've built your life around.

All of it becomes irrelevant in a world where AI saturates every human need and then keeps going.

The question isn't whether you believe him...

The question is what you're doing RIGHT NOW if there's even a 30% chance he's right.

Because the transition period between here and there?

That's where fortunes are made and destroyed.

And we're already in it.

[Brad @bradsaudit]

Persistent Influence Theory: A Hierarchical Framework for Structural Persuasion and Information Fidelity @SSRN https://t.co/JSGcKNtLuz

[Pierre Ferragu @p_ferragu]

“I tell you, if they keep silent, the stones will cry out!”
That’s silicon crying out here, and it is beautiful.

[Claude @claudeai]

We're launching Claude Community Ambassadors. Lead local meetups, bring builders together, and partner with our team.

Open to any background, anywhere in the world.

Apply: https://t.co/DTQBAzgQug

[Brad @bradsaudit]

I've been building an open-source AI auditing tool called BiasClear that detects structural persuasion patterns in AI outputs — the kind that pass every safety filter but still shape how you think. Published a writeup about it on the EA Forum. The tool is live if anyone wants to test it. Looking for feedback and people working on adjacent problems. https://t.co/rYmkzmGdiX

[Eric Trump @EricTrump]

Let me make this very clear: Big Banks (think JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, etc.) are lobbying overtime to block Americans from getting higher yields on their savings—while trying to block any rewards or perks from being given to customers.

These banks, and others, pay rock-bottom rates on standard savings (often 0.01%–0.05% APY), even as the Fed pays them 4% or more. This massive spread fuels record profits, with almost none passed back to their customers / everyday depositors.

Today, the banks are desperately targeting crypto/stablecoins, where platforms plan to offer 4–5%+ yields or rewards. The ABA and other lobbyists are spending millions trying to ban or restrict those yields via bills like the Clarity Act, crying “fairness” and using words like "stability"—when it's really about protecting their low-rate monopoly and preventing deposit flight. This is anti-retail, anti-consumer, and straight-up anti-American.

Next time you see a big bank dropping billions on a shiny new Midtown Manhattan HQ, you know exactly where that money comes from: the non-existent interest rate they “pay” you!

Fortunately, the big banks are losing this fight as customers wake up to the games…

@worldlibertyfi

[Ross Johnston @revivalistross]

Today, a demon decided to show up at a public high school.

Yes — an actual demon.

What you hear in the background is a young girl being set free from the devil.

Spiritual warfare is real.

This isn’t a “charismatic” or “Pentecostal” thing.

When the kingdom of darkness collides with the kingdom of our God, this is what happens.

Why?

Because power destroys principalities
and His presence dethrones powers.

We have entered days of a great showdown.

The enemy may start loud —
but he always ends defeated.

PS: This all happened while students were responding to the gospel and surrendering their lives to Jesus.

CMONNN 🔥

[Roger Ledbetter @rledbetterCPA]

Teaching my daughter about payroll withholding

She did chores all week so I owe her $10

I hand her $7

> this isn't $10

"right, I withheld the rest"

> what does that mean

"I kept $3 of your money"

> but it's my money

"It was your money"

> what are you even doing with it?

"Funding household infrastructure"

> what

"The roof over your head. The hallway you walk through to get to the bathroom. The door locks that keep strangers out"

> you're charging me for the hallway

"I'm charging you for access to the hallway. The hallway itself was a capital expenditure"

> you're my dad. you're supposed to---

"I'm also your government"

> what if I don't want to pay for the hallway

"Then I can't guarantee the hallway"

> it's a hallway. It's already there

"For now"

She asks what else the $3 covers

"Meals, dispute resolution, nightlight maintenance"

> dispute resolution?

"When your brother takes your toys and I make him give them back. That's taxpayer funded"

> that's just parenting

"That's the Department of Justice"

> what about meals. You already feed me

"That's a social program. Not everyone qualifies"

> I'm your daughter

"Which is why you're currently enrolled"

She wants to see where the money goes

I tell her that would require a FOIA request

> what's that

"A form asking me to show you what I do with your money. Processing time is 6 to 8 weeks"

> 6 weeks to see where my $3 went?

"Could be longer. We're understaffed"

> there's two of you

She asks how she gets any of it back

"It's already spent"

> you spent my money already?

"We had a budget shortfall"

> you just took it 20 seconds ago

"And the deficit existed 30 seconds ago. The timing worked out"

> so I'm not getting it back

"I didn't say that. You might qualify for a refund"

> of my own money

"Correct. You just have to fill out a form telling me how much you made"

> you know how much I made. You paid me

"Right but I need you to tell me how much I paid you"

> so you already know the answer

"The point is compliance"

She asks what happens if she gets the number wrong

"Penalty"

> from the money I don't have because you already spent it?

"We could set up a payment plan"

> I'm 8

"Monthly installments. Very manageable"

> you're going to penalize me for getting wrong a number you already know and then make me pay you back with money you took from me

"Now you're getting it"

> I want to talk to mom

"Mom's not a qualified representative. She can't help you here"

She stormed off to her room saying how this is extortion

Slammed the door

That's my little citizen

I've never been more proud

[Brad @bradsaudit]

@OpenAI “Less cringe” but it still won’t do trajectory math for archery because it thinks you’re building a weapon system. That’s not judgment. That’s a pattern matcher wearing a lab coat.