In the very recent past, the West made a strong argument for itself. If you immigrated, your family was won over within a generation.
Now, the very same people who are pushing unregulated immigration are the ones also architecting the rapid destruction of our cities, such that new immigrants find themselves repulsed by the idea of joining us, rather than enticed by the idea.
That feels intentional, a part of the controlled demolition of our civilization by powers that find individual liberty infuriating, and our rights a maddening obstacle to their control.
@SteveSkojec LLM's, as limited as they are, have convinced me that consciousness is an emergent property of a sufficient density of connection, relation and recursiveness.
@PaulVanderKlay@SteveSkojec I deeply enjoyed this conversation. I mainly was aware of Steve through Kale but can now see he is definitely worth a follow. Thank you.
Lara Logan just broke down a pattern that hits different once you see it.
They keep creating problems that can never actually be solved: racism that’s “unconscious,” masculinity as inherently toxic, CO2 as the enemy even though we breathe it out, and differences turned into permanent grievances.
The goal? Issues without end. Skin color can’t change. Breathing can’t stop. Masculine instinct doesn’t vanish. So the problems stay… and so does the control.
It’s not about fixing anything. It’s about keeping the fight alive so we stay divided and easier to manage.
Once you spot the tactic, everything gets clearer.
What “unsolvable problem” have you noticed getting pushed the hardest lately?
Britain used to be good at propaganda. Really good at it. Alongside the Navy, it was the one thing Britain’s foes always respected: not brute force, but the quiet art of trickery, the information gambit, the elegant misdirection woven so deeply into the machinery of state that you barely noticed the strings until they were already pulling you off course.
That was the genius of it. Subtle. Institutional. Almost artistic. Which is why half the world’s sharpest PR minds still cluster in London—trained here, highly compensated here, operating in that grey zone where influence feels like consensus.
So it’s genuinely painful to watch this latest episode. The official story around these Ukrainian arsonists and the attack on the PM’s property isn’t just clumsy; it’s an outright embarrassment. A gross, unvarnished shambles of deflection, selective omission, and conspiratorial stitching held together by the thinnest sheen of authority still available from the usual compromised assets—Hope not Hate and their like.
It has all the hallmarks of a once-great machine that’s simply given up. You can almost hear the weary sigh from the back rooms: “Sorry, this particular turd just can’t be polished. We’re out.”
The result is exactly what you’d expect: obvious lies, ill-connected narratives, and that sad, desperate attempt to project gravitas over something that smells rotten from a mile away. Britain once fooled empires. Now it can’t even fool its own people without blushing. What a fall.
And then there’s the BBC’s own contribution to this farce — a lengthy “investigation” that breathlessly insists the whole thing is a sophisticated Russian state operation, complete with shadowy Telegram handlers and grand sabotage campaigns. Yet it ends, almost as an afterthought, with the Metropolitan Police’s counter-terrorism chief stating plainly: “we’ve got no evidence to suggest that this was a state-backed threat.”
One can almost picture the poor producer staring at the screen, realising the carefully constructed house of cards has no foundation, and deciding to shove that inconvenient quote right at the end anyway. It’s the journalistic equivalent of polishing the turd for six paragraphs and then admitting in the final line that, actually, it’s still just a turd. The mismatch is glaring, the credibility shredded. Britain’s once-feared propaganda apparatus has devolved into self-owning spectacle.