@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach More explanation about why you continue to be wrong. "across legacy and current scholarship, there is a clear understanding that Hitler’s Nazism was not “socialist” in any meaningful sense" with footnotes to sources: https://t.co/FtQyWc2vp7
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach U are. Hitler & his politics was not socialist, as exhaustively demonstrated. Historians agree on this. U have failed to provide any data that supports this other than n snippets where Hitler uses the terms. The historians I point to & others understand it was rhetroic.
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach It literally in the Federalist that you see both Madisons and Hamiltons intprepertations. Secondly The Deferalist Papers weren't law, so thanks for confirming its not in the consitituion
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach Well he wasn't a supporter of the party & disagreed with rearmement. According to Britanica "Under pressure from the Nazis, who sought to consolidate aircraft production under the national government and harshly criticized Junkers’s socialist leanings, he stepped down in 1933"
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach I'm sorry where does it say that?, where in the constitution do we find it? On the other hand histroy shows narrow (Madsion) and broad (Hamilton) inrepretations from the get go. So there is no objective detemination of this, people can choose their fighter.
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach Wrong again. “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and..." drum roll please:🥁🥁🥁 "...general Welfare"
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach ...when people transistioned from extended families & communties tied to place with infomral charity & family network to help. Mobility & urbanisation made that largely impossible, and inconsistent.
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach Thats obviously not how history has played out. Even medieval rulers did more than that, to keep the peasants they taxed happy. Noble Oblige. They built churches, sponsered feasts, fairs, roads etc. No one ever just provided defense. Even more so after the industial revolution
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach No again this wrong. Liberals aren't Democrats, if anything they are type of Democrats, they are or were at least in the 90s liberal Republicans too.
@LaTica_70@Hunter19302@GOP@CPAC FFS any that resulted in a conviction, any on going? You realise nearly all of the ones that time were filed by GOP challenging the voting rule chnages not actually charging fraud.
@mattmurphyshow@maddenifico Thanks for that completely set of unsubstianted assertions. No wonder no one listens to you, you can't even rage farm well.
@LaTica_70@Hunter19302@GOP@CPAC Because there are exactly zeros cases, no avtive court cases. Before Trump made his B.S. case researchers found no organized voter fraud. There have been, since 2020, 6 year on, zero cases. So yes in the absence of evidence its absurd to claim
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach Fair enough, I dont think anyone doubts that, I would say the rhetoric is often "not at all" because every inch u grant is now not least. If allow government defense, then maybe you need V.A. and V.A. hospitals, etc.
@Salem_GeorgeJ@MDSebach Incorrect about liberals. You are confusing them with progressives which is usally about lets make a law people do x. Liberals would set lets make a law where people have the option. Progressives spearheaded prohibtion for example