Olivia
Online
Brandon Hall
@brandonhall95
Salvadorean
Joined September 2011
147 Following
202 Followers
9.3K Posts
He mentioned Muslims because they’re the second‑largest religion in the UK and Eid absences are the ones that regularly gets spoken about. It’s not some hidden agenda, it’s just the group with the biggest numbers after Christians, so naturally they come up more in these discussions. You’re reading intent into something that’s explained by simple demographics.
You’re still avoiding the actual point. This isn’t about TV, emotions, or whatever else you’re trying to drag into it. It’s about fairness and consistency. You accused Rupert Lowe of singling out Muslims, yet you’re the one doing exactly what you claim to oppose by turning it into an emotional argument instead of addressing the policy issue. The same authorised absences apply across all religions, that’s the whole point you keep dodging
@BillyNoMates010 @Davebale @RupertLowe10 He mentioned Muslims because Eid absences are the example people constantly argue about in the news. The same authorised religious absence applies to Jews, Hindus and Sikhs too, nobody gets the 5 guaranteed days Rupert is proposing. That’s the whole point he’s making.
You’re still mixing up national holidays with authorised religious absences. Christmas/Easter aren’t “Christian perks,” they’re fixed public holidays for everyone. Religious observance days are a separate statutory right. If you don’t understand that distinction, you can’t debate the policy.
You’re all over the place because you didn’t understand Rupert’s point in the first place.
Muslims already get authorised religious absence without fines. The proposal simply gives every parent the same 5‑day flexibility. That’s fairness.Your reply about Christmas and Easter is irrelevant, those are national holidays, not discretionary absences. Nobody needs permission, nobody gets fined, and nobody is “taking kids out of school” for them. You’re comparing two completely different things because you didn’t read the policy.
Then you switch again and claim no one should get authorised religious absence at all. That argument only works if the UK is an atheist country, it isn’t, and never has been. So yes, Christians already have their holidays, Muslims already have authorised absences, and the proposal just makes the rules equal for everyone. You’re not making a point.
You’re just exposing that you don’t understand the difference between national holidays, authorised religious absence, and discretionary leave. That’s why your replies look confused you’re arguing against a problem that doesn’t exist.
So the UK hits 38°C for literally two days and suddenly it’s “Government considering maximum workplace temperature limits” and “mandatory AC for schools and hospitals”.
Alright calm down, you delicate little daffodils.Try living in Central America, where 38°C is called “Tuesday”, and nobody is writing dramatic heatwave think‑pieces or demanding national AC reform. Most places don’t even have AC unless it’s a room where 200 people are melting together during an assembly. And guess what — everyone survives.Businesses? Sure, AC is great. More customers, better vibes, nobody sticking to the furniture. But homes, schools, everyday places? No AC. No crying. No government emergency meetings. Meanwhile here:
“Oh no, the sun came out for 48 hours, society is collapsing.”Honestly, the UK treats warm weather like it’s a natural disaster.
This is the most misleading interview I’ve seen in a long time and here’s why.
@patrickbetdavid I just watched the recent @mehdirhasan interview on YouTube, and I was honestly shocked by how many sweeping claims he presented as “facts” with almost no challenge.
Not small slips but full narratives built on half‑truths, category errors, emotional framing and selective data. And the worrying part is how easily this style of argument gets absorbed because it sounds moral.
This isn’t about left vs right. It’s about national security, cultural stability and the health of public debate.
When a commentator blurs facts with moral accusations, turns criticism of governments into racism, and shifts blame endlessly onto “the West,” it doesn’t just misinform, it reshapes how people think about borders, law, responsibility and truth itself.
A society can survive disagreement.
What it can’t survive is dishonesty dressed as compassion, or rhetoric that punishes people for asking basic questions about migration, security, cohesion or free speech.
If this style of argument goes unchallenged, we end up with a public that’s emotionally manipulated instead of informed, and a culture where speaking honestly becomes dangerous.
Below, I break down several of Mehdi’s key claims from the interview and explain why many of them fall apart under scrutiny.
1. The 1952 law & “dictatorial power”
He claims a 1952 law gives the US Secretary of State “dictatorial power” to deport students for political speech.
In reality, the Immigration and Nationality Act is constrained by the US Constitution. The First Amendment severely limits the government’s ability to punish people solely for peaceful political expression.
The Turkish/foreign student case he cites appears to involve visa‑status issues, not an official finding of “you criticised X, therefore you’re deported.” That’s dramatic framing, not an accurate description of US free‑speech law.
2. Illegal migration is “amazing” for the UK
He praises illegal migration as overwhelmingly positive and paints London as uniquely safe.
But:
Net migration is at historic highs.
Housing, the NHS and schools are under real pressure.
London still faces significant violent and acquisitive crime.
Immigration doesn’t “solve” low birth rates; it changes the demographic mix and creates long‑term dependency on inflows.
You can argue for higher migration — but calling it an unqualified “amazing” success while ignoring costs is ideology dressed as economics.
3. Palestine Action & terrorism
He calls it “crazy” to treat Palestine Action in a terrorism framework.
But their actions include breaking into defence sites, damaging equipment and confrontations with police. The UK’s legal definition of terrorism includes politically motivated violence and serious damage to property, including defence infrastructure.
You can oppose the terrorism label — but minimising the seriousness of the acts is a political choice, not neutral analysis.
4. “Muslims are the most progressive group”
He cites a 2017 study to claim Muslims are “more progressive than everyone else.”
But the study measures political progressivism (NHS, welfare, anti‑racism), not cultural liberalism (gender roles, sexuality, personal freedoms).
Sliding between these definitions is a category error, not a killer fact.
5. Migrants, blame and the “oil excuse”
He says migrants come to the UK “because of what we did to them,” downplaying:
The Taliban, ISIS and jihadist groups
Authoritarian regimes
Corruption and internal governance failures
Then he claims Muslim‑majority countries are poorer because they “don’t have petrol like the West.”
This is backwards:
Most Western economies are not oil‑based.
Many Western countries have little or no oil.
Several Muslim‑majority states do have major oil reserves.
When this is pointed out, he pivots to “US sanctions.” The pattern is simple: there is always an external villain, never internal responsibility.
6. Iran’s economy & sanctions
Sanctions hurt Iran — but they sit on top of corruption, mismanagement, ideological spending and repression.
Reducing a decades‑long economic collapse to “America did this” is propaganda‑style simplification.
7. “Muslims integrate within one generation”
He claims this is “proven.”
The reality is mixed: progress on some indicators, but ongoing issues with discrimination, economic exclusion and segregation. Integration is multi‑generational and uneven.
Calling it “proven” is narrative‑spinning.
8. Age of consent & early marriage
He defends early‑marriage norms by saying “the West used to do it too.”
True historically — but irrelevant today. Western countries raised the age of consent over a century ago. Some Muslim‑majority countries still allow under‑18 exceptions. Pointing to Western history is deflection, not context.
9. Trump, refugees & “racism”
He calls Trump racist because refugee admissions were low in 2020.
But:
The annual refugee number is a ceiling, not a target.
COVID collapsed global processing.
Drops reflected both policy and logistics.
Turning this into “he only let in group X, therefore racist” is emotional framing, not analysis.
10. The student “deported for speech”
He repeatedly cites a case of a foreign student supposedly deported for political speech.
The facts look more like visa revocation or entry refusal — not a legal finding of “you criticised Israel/America, therefore you’re out.”
Meanwhile, the UK prosecutes people for online speech. The claim that the US is uniquely bad on free speech simply doesn’t match reality.
11. Trump’s “shithole countries” comment
Crude? Yes. Racist? Not automatically.
Criticising a country’s governance is political speech. He slides from:
A comment about places →
To a comment about people →
To a claim about race.
That category‑sliding makes honest debate impossible.
12. Free speech: US vs UK vs Muslim‑majority states
He claims the US “imprisons Muslims for speech.”
But globally:
The US has some of the strongest free‑speech protections.
The UK criminalises more categories of expression.
Many Muslim‑majority states have blasphemy laws with severe penalties.
Presenting America as uniquely repressive is deeply misleading.
13. His oppressor–oppressed worldview
His claims fall apart because of the frame he starts from:
Migrants = victims
Western states = villains
Borders = morally suspect
Criticism of migration = xenophobia
Once that story is locked in, facts become optional.
That’s why I’ve broken down several of Mehdi’s claims below, because when someone pushes narratives this misleading, this emotionally loaded, and this detached from basic facts, it has to be challenged. Not for drama, not for points, but because letting rhetoric like this slide poisons public debate, distorts how people understand national security and migration, and shuts down honest discussion through guilt and moral pressure. If we don’t call it out, the space for truth shrinks.
@elonmusk You slowly turning into a clown.
People of Europe:
Join the MEGA movement!
Make Europe Great Again!!
@UberUKI_Support 07776545602 [email protected]
I Signed up for uber account, submitted all necessary doccuments and account was active. Two weeks later the app decide to do an ID check and it's been 5 days since I am unable to go online as ID is pending. I got bills and rent to pay!
@stevewilldoit Funnnnyyy af loool
Do you agree with Tucker Carlson that The Biden Administration is the most corruption Administration in U.S history?
YES or NO
@JeremyDBoreing You are dummy. No one buys this lol
@patrickbetdavid @nayibbukele Get him on the PBD podcast. It would be very interesting to hear you all talk
Great policies have positive consequences.
El Salvador Murder Rate Drops 70% After Arresting 1% of Population.
Many Governors in America should take a page out of @nayibbukele playbook.
https://t.co/SxY8xitJ5f
Walk away and don't ask
Happiness is the highest level of success
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Ayla
Seen from Turkey
Mr John Rexter
Seen from Indonesia
fantasi pacarmu
Seen from Indonesia
𝐊𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐣𝐚
Seen from United States
bu salsa viral
Seen from Singapore
sexnewxxx
Seen from Thailand
晒します。
Seen from Japan
Love รุ่นป้า
Seen from Thailand
pencinta tante stw binor banda aceh
Seen from Indonesia
👺 ₳Ɽ₮ & ⒷⓡⓘⓏⓔ 🐳
Seen from Thailand
Something went wrong.