Bravax

Independent researcher, quantum foundations. Geometric reconstruction of finite-dimensional QM from deterministic dynamics on ℂPⁿ⁻¹.

[Bravax @Bravax]

Very happy to be cited by Professor Inge Helland of Oslo university for my Paper B: https://t.co/kpg0v7Gga1

#bornrule #qm

[Bravax @Bravax]

LF2 Spec: https://t.co/Feqx0GeAnS

The Measure Bridge and Born-weight Wrapper in #Lean.

#qm #bornrule

[Bravax @Bravax]

Next one: https://t.co/mBMuuz1NPY

TN2: The Two-Qubit Singlet Correlation as a Symmetry-and-Operations Specialisation of Deterministic Volume Geometry

verify that the singlet preparation in dimension 4 satisfies the operational hypothesis package.

#qm #quantummechanics

[NVIDIA Newsroom @nvidianewsroom]

Introducing NVIDIA Ising, the world’s first open AI models to accelerate the path to useful quantum computers.

Researchers and enterprises can now use AI-powered workflows for scalable, high-performance quantum systems with quantum processor calibration capabilities and quantum error-correction decoding.

Learn more: https://t.co/jWT7X73T89

[Bravax @Bravax]

Continuing the #CSD map: TN1: Deriving the Fubini–Study Measure as an SU(N)-Equivariant Pushforward

This establishes the finite-dimensional measure bridge in #QM.

https://t.co/gKmqITJ2gy

#quantummechanics

[Bravax @Bravax]

Quantum used to tackle fraud in Lloyds experiment https://t.co/rDCeL7OrGT via @uktnofficial

[Bravax @Bravax]

Sadly prism from OpenAI hasn’t lived up to my expectations. Still an alpha product. I’ll try it in again in a few months. Back to #overleaf I go.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@andurobtc Very impressive. Where is the link to the study? I couldn’t see it.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@sanlsrni Very thorough analysis. Well worth a read.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@pmddomingos @skdh It will be interesting to see what you say in 5 years. Progress is being made, quantum sensing and other similiar technologies show they have value. QC is more complex and further behind, but will come.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@Ganeshuor True, but worth separating structure from interpretation.

Hilbert space is an effective epistemic framework: linearity encodes superposition, the inner product encodes probabilities, and completeness ensures stability.

Is this structure is fundamental, or emergent though?

[Bravax @Bravax]

@curiosityonx Entanglement is strange, but not mystical.

It reflects that composite systems are described by a joint state that does not decompose into independent parts. The correlations are fixed by the shared structure of the state, not by signals or spooky influence.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@SocraticScribe A nice illustration of emergent structure.

One subtle point though: in many physical settings, order does not come from randomness, but from deterministic dynamics plus typicality. The Galton board makes that distinction visible if you look carefully.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@mathelirium This is exactly right. What looks “mystical” is just algebra plus geometry.

Interference is the cross-term from squaring amplitudes. Phase controls sign and structure, not randomness.

In geometric terms, you are watching how paths combine before probabilities are assigned.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@Numapepi Fascinating John! You might find this interesting took: https://t.co/PhV6J8Q4YX

[Bravax @Bravax]

@StartsWithABang Lovely detailed article. We need more of these.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@GoogleQuantumAI Thanks! Hadn’t heard of that series before, I’ll look it up. My clear favourite to explain: The Born Rule.

[Bravax @Bravax]

@Saganismm Excellent video bringing gravity to life! No gravitons then?

[Bravax @Bravax]

@MIT_CSAIL @ScienceMagazine It mixes a few different areas but is still interesting. Add Copenhagen, MWI and new theories and add the first proven qubit, or quantum sensor… but what is next do you think?

[Bravax @Bravax]

Finite-dimensional reconstruction of quantum mechanics from deterministic geometric dynamics.

Born weights arise from Fubini–Study geometry and volume-typicality, without stochastic postulates.

Paper C (Zenodo DOI): https://t.co/U2cNPrNOOX