@disclosetv The full cock in throat action here of claiming you thought X had grown up as a platform, when they were sending poop emojis to anyone trying to contact them regarding serious matters of abuse on their platform.
Have some fucking dignity. Get off your knees.
@r_evolutie@UnionJacked__ You can set whether it's country or continent based. His is set to Continent. News flash, the UK is in Europe lol. Your evidence doesn't disprove anything.
@stuartjms@CentristMadness Stew, with all due respect, plenty of women spoke up at those events and were ignored because they didn't paint a certain picture.
These people are politicizing a real issue in our society, and ruining any chance at getting justice.
@PoliticsJOE_UK Entirely why I'm pro social media being banned. This women has been completely destroyed mentally by the forces at play in this upcoming election.
@RichardHanania Also the first line on the Crimes section claims a report which came out a few years ago, lay blame at the immigrant community from the 1970s onwards. If you check that report, it doesn't say that at all. They completely made it up.
It's a vile report taking advantage of people.
@MrBennyOT@lewis_goodall@btharris93 What an answer "Because I said so, and if you don't get it then that's on you"
I don't get it because your answer depends entirely on your thinking. Enlighten us.
@EddCoates Stop AI scraping then you don't end up in the small amount of citations that might bring someone over. Keep it and they endlessly request until you're just paying to be an information hub for someone elses AI, who is getting paid, and you aren't.
It's a bad system.
It is astounding how people just see what they want to see and ignore everything else.
This thread is full of people having a go at the guy on the bike for ignoring a no left turn sign (it says he can turn left)
@michaelgove His response was totally unjustified and rude. You did nothing wrong. The sign clearly says "no left turn" and the Highway Code puts you at the top of the hierarchy of road users.
@WarnerAlastair@siennamarla@AvaSantina YouTube premium is already a thing that plenty of people pay for.
And they could open up advertising to this specific age.
Google is going to be losing the profit they get via kids pretending to be older than they are via the original YT app anyway. Makes sense to me.
@WarnerAlastair@siennamarla@AvaSantina Indeed, it was created for kids under the age of 13. Hence the content filters.
I'm pretty sure they could expand the filter ranges to those kids above 13. Trillion dollar company. I believe in them.
@WarnerAlastair@siennamarla@AvaSantina Given the legislative changes. You honestly think YouTube won't change policy in response to ensure they can still have the audience?
I think they will.
Plus, I'm guessing there is now a market for said content. Before people just relied on them using normal YT.