Independent thinker that is aware & AWAKENED to the conscious & subconscious power we hold in this universe & against those who seek to suppress & destroy it.
🚨Defend the Prego! 😂😂
Candace Owens unleashes pure comedy chaos on a room full of her detractors.
The video is a hilarious parody that turns a simple pregnancy announcement into slapstick where Candace Owens effortlessly swats away all her haters.
@AndrewKolvet That’s all he was to you? Just your fking workhorse? Just a flunky used to carry out the policies you approved? Wasn’t he more than your political tool? Why can’t any of you ghouls just see him as a human being!?
I never knew Kobe Bryant - not even his name - until his tragic death, along with his daughter and 7 others, all taken violently and before their time.
As a conservative, I knew Charlie Kirk; I followed and admired him; felt his passing profound sadness.
I recently watched Vanessa Bryant’s eulogy for Kobe and their daughter, Gigi. It was real emotion, hard to listen to, but at the same time, it was so touching it was heartwarming.
It was a message of lasting love, of deep unending loss, and a personal insight into who Kobe, and Gigi, really were.
That kind of insight leaves you feeling as though you’d really known someone, even if only for a moment, and feeling the loss in that moment when you realise they’re no longer there for you to admire, appreciate and really get to know.
By the time she’d finished, in so many words, she had thanked God for the time they’d had together, revealed heartfelt intimate details about who they really were, and told us that nothing will ever be the same again.
That’s the point of a eulogy. It’s to get to know the person we’ve just lost. Not the neighbour, or the shopkeeper up the road, not the basketball player or the Oscar winner nor the political activist, but the actual person.
I never knew Kobe, but by the end I felt as if I knew what kind of man he was, and to be honest it put a lump in my throat more than once. It was very powerful.
That’s instinctive, by the way - not learned or scripted. I’ve given eulogies for a best friend, my mum, dad and my granddad. It’s instinctive because on some level we all know that the struggle you once overcame together and now laugh about, or the silly voice someone used every morning to wake you up for school, or the fact they never once missed kissing your nan goodnight in fifty years, all tell us far more about a person than any figure ever could. It’s instinctive because as humans it’s a catharsis we all need, to begin healing, honouring and remembering.
After Erika’s eulogy for Charlie, I felt nothing but anger. She begins, in so many words, by telling us that Charlie’s death was a gift from God that Charlie himself had asked for; she shares anecdotes of how others comforted her; tells us how grateful Charlie was for her; and even takes a moment to voice resentment towards men in general, lecturing on how to live: “your wife is not your servant.”
The cheers from the mourners were as cheers from an evangelical movement. The whole eulogy played out like the kind of sermon you’d expect at a megachurch - complete with calls to action and, of course, for funding.
Please listen to it properly. It’s mostly about Erika, about what “Charlie thought of her.” Then it challenges, chastises and lectures.
By the time she’s finished, she’s thanked God for the situation she finds herself in, forgiven the man we’re told killed Charlie, and told us how great things will be going forward - now she’s in charge.
Erika’s eulogy for Charlie was scripted - clearly not by her - and as a result, it was not heartfelt, and failed to connect, with anyone.
Vanessa’s, by contrast, was clearly written - not scripted - by her. They were her words, and she felt and delivered them so powerfully that we all grieved with her - even someone like me who never even knew who he was - and thanked God for him having been the man he was.
One eulogy is a celebration of a life, of gratitude at having shared it, a reckoning with the unfairness of it, and a promise to honour him always.
The other is a celebration of loss, of her gratitude for having paid the price of “God’s love” with her husband’s life, of moving on, and of what comes next.
There’s nothing wrong with looking forward, but that’s not a eulogy. Maybe the kind ChatGPT might write given some prompts, but not the eulogy of someone who instinctively knows that what they’ve lost can never be replaced.
It’s true that everyone grieves differently. But it’s also true that some people do not, or cannot, grieve at all.
@paleochristcon The fact that you think you dunked on him with this comment 🤡 @TPUSA is so lame for hiring you lmao. I bet they (and you) thought you were so edgy with that cigarette in your profile pic. It’s time for plan E TPUSA. So far… absolutely NOTHING is working. 😩
This video is actually showing how hard @RealCandaceO is trying NOT to cry & show emotion. If she were “pretending” to cry she’d go straight to the Erika Kirk playbook, grab a tissue and dab her eyes. The quivering of her voice & real tears welling up in her eyes cannot be faked.
Candace is pretending to cry.
100%.
She talks about Charlie—acting “choked up” as she lies about Erika.
This clip is repulsive for many reasons, and it’s wild that ANY married woman would be a fan of Candace.
➝ She coveted Charlie
➝ Another woman’s husband
➝ Even in his death, she continues to be a jealous, envious, home-wrecker-type
@bren45000 PS: This video is actually showing how hard she’s trying NOT to cry & show emotion. If she were “pretending” to cry, she’d go straight to the Erika Kirk playbook and grab a tissue. At least we hear her voice quiver can see real tears welling up in her eyes. That cannot be faked.
@bren45000 100% you don’t believe this. This is just a cope because you don’t want to accept that his own wife can’t muster up GENUINE feelings for her husbands death but Candace can. So out of despair, you resort to obscene false narratives to latch onto. Human nature... I get it. 😮💨
This @nytimes op-ed completely misses the point on the purpose of marriage and children and completely misrepresents my views in the process. The entire article is laced with viewing family through the lens of money and career as if those things bring fulfillment and purpose. When you’re on your death bed, your money and your career won’t be whispering in your ear “I love you” as you take your last breath. The material goods and fortune of this world mean nothing when we go to our eternal resting place.
The author also conveniently leaves out the part of my Hillsdale commencement speech where I said “marry young, not rushed, but young.”
We serve a God of order and when you live a life ordered there’s a double portion of grace. Meaning marriage first, then kids, and everything else. Timing matters because life is shorter than you might think, and you never know what could happen. The point is, don’t put it off. Don’t rush it or force it if it’s not right, but don’t put it off.
I say this from a place of personal reflection. My marriage with Charlie and our babies are the biggest blessings of my life. I was 32 when I married Charlie, which in my mind is neither young to start a family or old. You just run up against statistics at that point and it just so happened to be the Lord’s timing and He still blessed us with two beautiful children. But I wish we met and were able to start our life and family together much sooner.
There is no such thing as perfect timing to have kids. Financial struggles are a part of life, but the problem is a lot of Americans are self-surviving, not self-sacrificing, and they expect to live a very distinct lifestyle based on what they see online. When Charlie encouraged young people to have more kids than they can afford, he wasn’t saying to recklessly bring a child into this world and have them on welfare. He was saying children aren’t a luxury item to have once you meet a certain tax bracket threshold. You don’t need a mansion in order to build a family.
It’s easy when you’re young to think that you have all the time in the world, but it’s a hard fact of life and science that that’s simply not the case. If you've met your person and you’re checking off boxes based on societal expectations of dating for a couple years, then a long engagement, then adjusting to married life before having children, you’re wasting valuable time. Getting pregnant in your late 30s and 40s is usually a lot harder than in your late 20s. Not always, but it’s a hard reality for many couples.
The inverted priorities of our current culture encourages women to believe that getting married and having children are weights on an otherwise rich and carefree existence. And yet, young Americans have never felt less happy or carefree. Children are not an obstacle, they're a gift from the Lord. They give life so much more meaning than you could ever imagine. When we stop looking at marriage and children as barriers to a happy life, maybe then there’ll be progress in this country.
@Joshua_the_car lol these losers are so far removed from reality and have to exaggerate stories and fabricate lies because they’ve got nothing else. “Fleeing the country”. 🙄 Absolutely pathetic.