@rooster_mtn @BishopDrive @ChrisMattson11 Yes. Staff should be paid enough so that they don't have to worry if they will be tipped enough to make rent. Any tips should be unexpected.
@Kin2485819 @ArchieTempl @ChrisMattson11 At least you would pay the piece without feeling blackmailed every time you go out.
Amount paid is the same, but it matters how it is presented to you.
You are not the bad person who "only" tipped x%.
@maybeoclock@TanguyAdriaens1@TheIllix @ChrisMattson11 That is bs. Tipping culture in the US is just a greedy way for owners to push the responsibility of paying a decent wage to customers by blaming them for not being kind enough. Blackmail.
If they aren't able to charge enough for their services, they have no place in the market.
@LINKistheway @tylerdmace @dystopiabreaker You are completely right. For that stage of the scheme, private keys had to be accessible by the automation script. But later on a hardware wallet could have been used. Should have.
@enlightnpenguin @porygondoteth @dystopiabreaker Where would they have the resources to pay the hackers from? Were they really rich in 2016/17?
Anyway, they are being accused of laundering, not hacking, so you might be right.
@tylerdmace @dystopiabreaker That is why the standard recommendation for storing thousands of btc is, at least, a multisig using hardware wallets. At least.
@bhh1953 @HillebrandMax @BlockFi To each one, their risks. It seems like the guy was on top of things, just didn't read the tos or expect it to be taken seriously.
To be fair, the crappy tos is pretty clear.
@_Luke_Ferguson @HillebrandMax @BlockFi To pay nice to banks and regulators and decreasing risk of being shut down by either one. It's called overcompliance.
They avoid being linked to coins used by fraudsters.
@HEBurro @EmilFilm @Marketsbylili @swoos_h Yes, it is risky. Anyone should decide for themselves what they value more and what risks to take.
But, if everybody coinjoins, the risk disappears.