VIVA is EVIL- and here is why
Viva continuously uses phrases similar to: "It is EVIL to question the involvement of Erika/Harpole/Terryl / etc."
As soon as the below events occurred, these people have forfeited their right to not be questioned, or at least to be required to give a reasonable explanation for their actions:
Erika: "That man. That young man. I forgive him" (10 days after the murder)
Harpole: "My security team did nothing wrong."
Terryl: Immediately films the most bizarre selfie video and declares Charlie dead. Quickly takes the SD card before police and investigators arrive.
If you act in a disingenuous way, you open yourself up to everyone speculating about your motives and your involvement. For example, if you are not involved in a crime, but you lie about some related element, sorry, but you have now exposed yourself to more heavy scrutiny, no? You might think it's evil for people to accuse/suspect you but it is completely your own fault.
Maybe Erika was genuine when she announced her forgiveness during a public and televised memorial. Maybe she just wanted to make sure Tyler didn't get acquitted. Maybe she wanted to use the moment to showcase her compassion and the Christian spirit. It doesn't really matter...because we will never know what her true motives were. However, once she did that, she now looks completely suspicious to anyone with a brain and a heart. And she hasn't come out and said, "I NEVER should have said that. We MUST conduct a thorough investigation to ensure it was him and ensure that we identify ANYONE else that is involved". Instead she doubles down that it was Tyler and aggressively tells everyone to stop looking into the case. It is beyond bizarre...but you want to blame anyone that notices the bizarre behavior to feel like they are Evil?!?
All 3 on the podcast jointly acknowledged that Harpole is refusing to take ANY responsibility for his team's failures with security. If he wants to take that stance, I'm sorry, but you have now thrown yourself into the speculation fire. You now look completely disingenuous to anyone with a brain and a heart.
I will skip Terryl, but its no different. How can anyone not think that guy is sus x1000?!?!
So my conclusion can only be that the true evil ones are those that keep throwing around the phrase, "It is evil to question...".
I'm evil for my brain recognizing strange and disingenuous behavior?!?!
I'm evil for my heart sensing that people are being dishonest, but not knowing the level of their dishonesty?!?!
Note: I don't really think Viva is evil. He seemed reasonable and honest, as did Jimmy and Bret.
I'm just tired of the "evil" gaslighting towards those who seem to only want the truth.
His spell is (in any of his conspiracy debates): "Well tell me what you think happened?"
He cannot counter the claims of endless suspicious happenings. It is more effective for him to not engage in those topics and try to force the speculation of alternative theories. Then he can fairly easily pick apart those since (if they are incorrect) there are likely many points/facts which make that theory stupid or (if its actually what happened) there is minimal to zero evidence, because the authorities have been specifically trying to prevent evidence connected to the real story from getting revealed.
In the end- there is more evidence supporting that TR did it, than there is for any alternative theories. So he cannot lose the debate as he will not try to discredit Candace's concerns. Stew Peters was not prepared for this tactic.
I think the response to Andrew can be- "I do not need to provide alternative theories, I am discrediting the prosecutions theory. Do I need to have an accurate and generally accepted alternative theory to think confidently that:
-JFK was not killed by LHO
-9/11 was not perpetuated by evil Muslim terrorists that just want innocent American blood
- Covid was not what it seams.
If I have to PROVE an alternative theory to discredit the nonsense from our government, the.government will never lose."
That is the spell
Great list. My opinions
- Remove "Extremely fake and gay". No need to distract the content with a Candace phrase. People will think you are just parroting her.
- Separate the facts from your opinions. For example "9/12: Erika posts a video on her IG showing her crying over Charlie's casket. It is suspected that the video was recorded by Stacy Sheridan and that Erika was wearing a microphone. [This is VERY strange and shocking behavior]
That is the exact thing that he would do. It has to be your first kick (because you won't be able to hide it if you need to spar for a few minutes) and it has to be an abnormal/wild move (to make it seem as if that move has the potential to blow your knee out).
Originally, I believed the same thing as you said..but I had to think from their shoes.
@depositmaya For me it's "Are you busy tomorrow?" or "Do you have plans Saturday?" type of questions, followed by, "In that case, can you...?".
It's always a setup. You feel guilty denying any request they make after you said that you don't have any plans.
It's a manipulation tactic