You want to know my biggest problem with the singular obsession over the Save America Act?
It’s not that I don’t support it. I do.
But Republicans have power *now.* How about cutting spending now? Fixing healthcare now? Reforming the bureaucracies now?
Same story every time.
Widespread contraception (the pill) turned procreative sex into recreational sex that fractured the relationship between men and women that led to promiscuity that led to no fault divorce that led to abortion that led to the destruction of the family that led to societal chaos and our current moment.
While everyone is talking about the LA election, just remember that posting discrepancies about the 2020 election used to be grounds for suspension on Twitter 1.0
Trump himself was banned here
That's how bad it was before
I’m often asked: When we overturn gay marriage, is interracial marriage next?
Nope. Here’s why.
Interracial marriage and same-sex marriage are not the same.
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court struck down racist marriage bans, reinforcing the basis of husband-wife marriage, not redefining it. The Court removed an illicit barrier that had nothing to do with the meaning or purpose of procreative marriage.
Obergefell v. Hodges did something very different. It created a new “fundamental right” to a same-sex marriage license, something absent from the Constitution’s text, history, and tradition. Because it departed from our legal tradition rather than conforming to it, Obergefell remains open to challenge.
But the differences are not just legal. The outcomes for children are opposite as well.
In an interracial marriage, children remain connected to both of the adults to whom they have a natural right. They are raised by the mother and father responsible for their existence and identity. Nothing about interracial marriage requires a child to lose a parent.
Same-sex marriage does.
Children raised by same-sex couples are necessarily separated from at least one biological parent. They are denied a relationship with half, and sometimes all, of their genetic heritage. They lose either a mother or a father.
Reversing Obergefell would have no impact on Loving. Interracial marriage remains legally secure because Loving upheld the historic understanding of marriage while removing a racist barrier.
Restoring the man-woman meaning of marriage protects what matters most to children: their mother and father.
Oh, please. The Trump Administration is targeting lawyers who tell their clients to lie. Contrast that with targeting lawyers who gave Trump legal advise that Biden and Democrats didn't like.
Everyone has the exact same right to marriage. It's where
one
unmarried
of-age
consenting
male
makes a covenant and contract with
one
unmarried
of-age
consenting
female.
LBGT activists didn't want to participate in marriage, so they had to use special pleading to redefine it to include their personal preferences.
"Contrary to the claims of critics, the court did not take away anyone’s right to vote. Nor did it repeal the Voting Rights Act. What it did was recognize that the Constitution places limits on how far government may go in using race as a political tool – even for ostensibly benevolent purposes." https://t.co/dHpgJTNhWh
If Elon owned 𝕏 in 2020 they would not have been able to get away with stealing the election.
The operation depended on total control of the information.
How many people were shutdown for questioning the election and January 6th?
Silencing dissent. Silencing truth.
Facts.
Hi @Apple
This, in fact, is not a US holiday. US holidays are 4th of July, Labor Day etc. Then there are religious holidays. How about you give us the ability to select the holidays we want on our calendar? I will never celebrate or have a schedule conflict with this one.
Your staff told you this might not fly. And the Virginia SC could’ve ruled before the vote but AG Two Bullets asked them not to. It’s like this little game was played just to claim the judiciary is illegitimate because they no longer legislate from the bench for Democrats.
There is no “DEI Exemption” to longstanding federal anti-discrimination law.
Employment decisions based on race or sex can violate Title VII, regardless of intent. This includes: hiring, firing, and promotions as well as access to training, fellowships, mentorships, workplace events or other benefits.
I believe America should be a post-racial society where we have put our historical legacy of racism entirely behind us and we judge all men and women by the quality of the life path they choose, and not based on immutable characteristics like skin color.
Democrats hate me for that.
That's because for Democrats, racism is power. That fact has never not been true since Andrew Jackson first founded that accursed party.
I don't believe in special "political rights" for any racial group whatsoever. I believe in human rights at the level of the individual.
If you want special rights for specific races, that makes you a racist.
They’re all reading from the same book, aren’t they?
“Race-Grifting for Dummies.”
Now Gavin Newsom is out here preaching about “Jim Crow 2.0.”
You know what Jim Crow 1.0 actually was?
Southern Democrats standing in schoolhouse doors, defending segregation, and keeping black Americans in chains politically, economically, and culturally.
Jim Crow 0.0 was EVEN WORSE.
Also brought to you by the Democrat Party.
The same party that once fought civil rights now lectures the rest of us about race every election cycle because fear is all they have left.
And Gavin, here’s a free piece of advice: not every national conversation requires a Hollywood audition tape from Sacramento, especially when you sound completely tone deaf to everyday Americans.
Black voters aren’t being silenced.
They’re being liberated from decades of political manipulation, guilt, dependency politics, and the insulting assumption that they all have to think the same way.
What really terrifies the left, is that they’ve lost control.
They are getting increasingly brazen as they discuss rigging our governing institutions in republic-destroying, power-mad ways. Openly, dangerously destructive.