Doing a deep dive into the Virginia class, and the more I read about stuffing a 30 megawatt nuclear reactor into a metal tube packed with 140 people that’s underwater for 90 days at a time, the more annoyed I get at the nuclear power naysayers here on land.
@Stizmaster@CMSeeberger@kelmej Meanwhile, if you bothered to read the article before commenting you would see:
“To date, North Carolina has received just 12-14% of the funds needed to complete western North Carolina’s recovery.”
And then see bureaucratic process above that hampers the flow of funds
@RyanLan04214169@CMSeeberger@kelmej I am really not quite sure how to help you here … I typed it really slowly in the hopes that it would help you understand that more bureaucratic process equates to higher cost and more delays.
Not a difficult concept.
@JenAgainDoh@CMSeeberger@kelmej (5/x) importantly, @jenagaindoh, this is not a partisan issue. It’s not something you score political points on; it’s about helping people who continue to wait for help.
Nor is the concept difficult: remove layers of bureaucracy to delivery relief faster…and at a cheaper cost.
@JenAgainDoh@CMSeeberger@kelmej (4/x)…this is not a partisan issue instead systemic. The same bureaucracy was there during Biden and Obama administrations.
And don’t take my word for it. Ask a mayor - any mayor - to explain process + their frustrations, it will almost always be process, paperwork and delays
@JenAgainDoh@CMSeeberger@kelmej WNC is waiting because FEMA is unable to get out of their own way in order to distribute the funds.
Simply put: if the funds went directly to the state, then the state could administer relief without the multiple layers of federal bureaucracy. (1/x)
Big news for the HASC GOP race: Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers will seek a waiver to remain as the top Republican on the defense authorizing panel next Congress, he told the Alabama Daily News.
He's term limited out after this year.
https://t.co/WIMnE7qklz
@thehill …interesting use of the word “unconditional” in the phrasing around voting against support for Israel.
Not sure that is the standard for the Members who voted for support, so why include it as the conditioner for the opposition?