Let's be as clear as possible regarding the Labour Party, they have failed, utterly and miserably failed. They were always going to, you can't go left-wing control and redistribution after a Conservative government did the same - there was no juice left.
As the cabinet and back benchers turn on Keir, looking for a new leader...no change will make things better.
They are ideologically misaligned with what a successful and prosperous nation requires and either deeply unimpressive or fundamentally dangerous.
- Reeves is useless
- Lammy is dangerous
- Rayner both
- Miliband is literally retarded
- Phillipson and Cooper, please
We will have the theatre of a leadership contest then the decline will continue.
The only thing which can save the country is a people's revolution - keeping the socialists and Fabian's as far away from the state as possible.
We only have one choice - a massive slashing of the state, taxes, welfare and regulations. We must restore law and order and make Britain a meritocracy again.
If we don't, the best, the wealthy and the ambitious will leave and you will be left with nothing. Idiots on the left will say "go then, we're better off without you". No, you're an idiot - you do not understand money, economics and incentives. You break things which work for things which sound nice.
We have limited time.
If this claim is accurate, this marks a fundamental shift in the relationship between the state, work, and identity.
Linking the right to work to a mandatory digital ID is not a minor admin change, it’s a structural change to citizenship in practice.
If the government truly intends to make digital ID a condition of work, it must be subjected to:
- full parliamentary scrutiny
- public consultation
- independent civil liberties assessment
- and transparent procurement review
Anything less bypasses democratic consent.
If this claim is accurate, this marks a fundamental shift in the relationship between the state, work, and identity.
Linking the right to work to a mandatory digital ID is not a minor admin change, it’s a structural change to citizenship in practice.
This is not about being anti-technology.
It’s about ensuring:
- proportionality
- democratic consent
- hard legal limits
- and real exit rights
before compulsion is introduced.
@InstituteGC Important to challenge the framing here. Digital ID isn’t just a service upgrade, it’s foundational infrastructure with long-term power implications. Thread below 👇https://t.co/XcCMHc50yi
If digital ID is truly as benign and beneficial as claimed, then there should be:
- full transparency on vendors
- clear limits on data reuse
- strong opt-out rights
- and meaningful public consultation before national rollout.