@atlwinb Ignore the haters. Having lived in Atlanta and now living near Chicago, they are both very similar culturally to the regions they are in. Chicago the largest main hub of the Midwest and Atlanta the Southeast. Not to mention that both exploded in size due to railroads
Car: SF—> LA —> Atlanta (a solo 4 day odyssey)
Bus: Texas to Orlando (I love marching band)
Train: Chicago -> Texas (27 hrs!)
Plane: DFW to Frankfurt, Germany
I have taken some wild trips lol
car: chicago->st louis->dc->nyc->erie->cleveland->chicago
bus: probably the south shore line bus substitution (?)
train: ann arbor->chicago->wisconsin dells
plane: chicago->hong kong
>be me
>move to Chicago
>”omg it’s going to be so cold and snowy”
>”8-12 inches predicted this Friday”
>It rains
Man, climate change sucks
Trains offer an easy alternative to flying & take cars off the road, an important step in the sustainability of communities. Places like the Front Range, Texas Triangle, and SE Piedmont are seeing explosive pop. growth. They need better rail. 🤞the new FRA routes open soon 3/3
My most “return to tradition” position is to return to the intercity rail network we used to have. The 1960s image isn’t even the greatest extent we had! I understand that passenger rail isn’t a money maker, but that’s just a good reason to fully nationalize it 🧵1/3
Long distance trips (Chicago to TX) will never be advantageous over airplanes, except for weirdos like me. They just take too long. But fighting climate change will require replacing <6 hr drives or regional flights with frequent train service. 2/3
@astrogrifff Yeah, planes are faster and more convenient, but trains are cheaper, more environmentally friendly, a journey unto themselves, no security or checked baggage and….look at all this leg room! More than a full arms length