@Boboka2024@Bedouin505@Tarrasbulba123 That’s the thing you don’t believe God has extramental existence according to you He is only a figment of your imagination
@ithinkitmyway@muslimorthodoxy Alan Brubaker’s book isn’t taken seriously in academia as it makes many blunders. Farid Al Bahraini debunks his weak argumentation.
https://t.co/kXRVdDEwGs
@whymeldn@Giden2004@muslimorthodoxy I don’t think it’s possible to be a Trinitarian and steep in history, considering how the historical conclusions contradict the Trinitarian narrative.
@Giden2004@muslimorthodoxy Are you retarded or something? It’s weak because it isn’t historically authentic. Is this attempt to shift an implicit concession
@Giden2004@muslimorthodoxy The report you’re speaking about is weak and Ibn Kathir states it’s weak as Antioch was never destroyed and that Shu’ayb al Jabai lived 90 after the Prophet died
@PhiloxenusS@adam17129@LAldyn43792 Already been refuted that the grandson narration is weak, and you couldn’t respond to the fact that Jesus according to you would be a zesitite for participating in metzitzah b’peh. I been known Arabic and we’ve been theologically raping your three headed dog god for centuries.
@PhiloxenusS@adam17129@LAldyn43792 Bro
No way you’re that retarded 😂😂😂😂
23:4 is talking about they’re not consistent in holding what they teach, despite EVERYTHING they’re teaching is true.