@Opinion_Ihave sure I am unattractive, but the average man would have no chance of ever being with an attractive women (or likely any woman) in a non monogamous society.
Do men understand how horrendous non-monogamy would be for them? Women will be fine, we will go to the wealthiest men who can sustain harems and live lives of leisure and comfort. While the remaining 90% of men will die alone never reproducing or having sex.
life long monogamy only became the social and legal norm around the same time as private property because governments wanted an easier way to control and track lineage and inheritance lines. religious texts then reinforced it a few thousand years later to further solidify control.
monogamy has never been natural in humans nor did it occur naturally and spontaneously within society. even during roman times when it was the norm, elites still fucked slaves and lower classes.
imo it’s very likely that monogamy and christianity is only popular because of a government propaganda push to make the bureaucracy process smoother
@nozomilover373 That’s because men don’t like women over 30 we know this of course, They get bored of their wives as they get old. This is why I’m proposing the legalization of multiple wives. You can simply take as many wives as you’re wealthy enough to support.
@AldusHxley75602 yes my point exactly, poor men are only loyal because they have no choice. Not because they’re better people. It would be better for women to form harems around wealthy men as men will cheat once they have the option to anyways. women should accept and support male nature.
@winedrinker801 When a wealthy man cheats on his wife men, defend him saying it’s natural and a part of male sexuality. But when I, a woman accept and support male sexuality it’s a problem?
@razorfang No not every man, if even half of men took two wives than 50% of men would not have wives. Thats how non monogamy works and is why the majority of men never reproduced. I believe only the wealthiest and handsomest men should reproduce!
@pwaiomoakinwale I’m literally agreeing with you? We should ditch broke men and be concubines and wives for wealthy men. I support your cause! Men need variety! ✊
@pwaiomoakinwale I am agreeing with men that they should be able to be with multiple women as it is their nature. What is the problem with that? I support male sexuality.
@brooklynfemcel Studies of DNA reveal that historically only 40% of men (vs 89% of women) have reproduced.
For Europeans, Greco-Roman antiquity incentivized monogamy but it was Christianity’s universal enforcement of it which men can thank for leveling the numbers.
@fartmanjw If even half of men took two wives that would leave 50% of men without wives. However most women would be fine. Maybe not for me, you’re right I’m unattractive, but it would probably no longer be possible for an average man to get an attractive wife.
@fartmanjw I am a pro male sexuality, pro polygamist. Male sexuality causes them to want to be with many women. I am simply accepting this. And you can’t really dispose of a wife without having to pay alimony in which case yes I would be fine with it.
My hot take on cheating is that a man can want to fuck every single woman he meets, and it means nothing. He probably never will.
But the moment a woman even begins to entertain the thought of fucking another man, the relationship is already over.
@runequantum I mean if just half of men took just two wives wouldn’t that leave 50% of men with no wives. Now take into account the current economic imbalance, a billionaire/multi millionaire could have hundreds of wives… meaning most men would have no wife.
@FreedomOfArtNow the working class would cheat in a millisecond if he won the lottery because that is “male nature” as men themselves like to remind us.
@FreedomOfArtNow I’m all for it, we as women should just openly start rejecting working class men to share the wealthiest. There’s really no point in dating a poor man who would cheat if he had the money/option to.