• Result: The tax base shrinks faster than revenue rises. Wealthy people often hold illiquid assets (company stock, real estate), so they sell, restructure via trusts/offshore entities, or leave—reducing future income, property, and sales tax collections.
2. Shrinking Tax Base + Deficits → Economic Distress
• Lower revenue from high earners (who pay a disproportionate share of income taxes) worsens budget shortfalls.
• Governments cut services, raise other taxes, or borrow more → declining public services, higher costs for everyone else, and social unrest.
• Asset prices (especially real estate and businesses in the affected area) depress as demand from wealthy buyers falls and economic activity slows. Distressed sales increase.
3. Distressed Assets Acquired Cheaply by Institutions
• Big players (banks, private equity, pension funds, sovereign wealth) with access to cheap credit, offshore structures, or tax carve-outs step in.
• They buy properties, businesses, or other assets at depressed prices. Dixon argues the system is rigged with exemptions for corporate vehicles that average people or departing individuals can’t easily use.
• Privatized gains: These buyers hold or develop the assets as the cycle turns, capturing upside. Losses (from the initial distress) were “socialized” via public budgets/taxpayers.
4. Unrest and Control Mechanisms Create New Profit Centers
• Resulting inequality and service breakdowns fuel crime/social issues → demand for private prisons (a for-profit sector) and expanded surveillance/policing.
• Companies like Palantir (co-founded by Thiel) benefit from government contracts for data/tech solutions. Dixon sees this as the “technological-industrial complex” and “military-industrial complex” profiting from the chaos they indirectly enable.
5. Overall Wealth/Power Consolidation
• Politicians (left or right) are seen as serving corporate lobbies, not ideology. The “left vs. right” framing distracts from the shared outcome: bigger government + bigger connected business.
• End result: More concentrated ownership of real assets by a smaller elite, while the middle/lower classes face higher effective burdens, inflation from money creation (QE/debt), or reduced opportunities. Wealth transfers “to billionaires by design” via engineered distress rather than direct seizure
@DH_Altin Fee, komisyon, slippage veya spread biraz artsa sistem kolayca negatife dönebilir. Stres test uygulayın, farklı broker dataları deneyin, curve reelde bu kadar düzgün olmayacaktır.
@Cole_Walmsley No, 8 years ago it was 19.000$, today 80.000$. Same things told. No one buys it anymore. Sorry. You can sell your war bonds somewhere else.
For 15+ years crypto holders have been told:
“Just wait.”
“Adoption takes time.”
“Institutions are coming.”
Meanwhile, look at the actual size of the game 👇
Gold market cap: ~$35T
Global bond market: ~$130T+
That’s boomer capital. Pension funds. Sovereign reserves. Insurance balance sheets. Central bank collateral.
Now crypto?
Total market cap: ~$2T.
Even after a decade and multiple cycles.
Crypto feels big inside the bubble.
But zoom out — it’s financially microscopic.
Gold is a 5,000-year monetary asset.
Bonds are the backbone of the global system.
Crypto is still fighting for allocation scraps.
The pain isn’t price volatility.
The pain is realizing how small your asset class still is relative to the capital pools that actually move the world.
Generational shift doesn’t happen on Twitter timelines.
It happens when pension funds reallocate 5%.
When sovereign wealth funds change mandates.
When central banks diversify reserves.
That hasn’t happened at scale. Not yet.
And until it does, the “young generation asset” remains structurally tiny compared to the legacy balance sheet world.
X is getting hijacked by Solana and its dev army. The dawn of a rival is inevitable.
A true rival to X would need:
• Better signal-to-noise (anti-bot, anti-spam, actually good recommendations—not just “engagement”).
• Real free speech without selective enforcement.
• Payments/creator economy that doesn’t funnel straight into one chain’s token machine.
• Tech that scales without the outage history or centralization whispers Solana catches flak for. @elonmusk
Can 58 tons of gold meaningfully affect gold prices?
On its own, no—there's no 15% difference at play. Here are the reasons why, in the context of scale:
- Market size and liquidity: The London over-the-counter gold market has an average daily trading volume of over 20 million ounces (~620+ tons). The global daily trading volume (over-the-counter + futures like COMEX + ETFs) typically exceeds 150-200 billion dollars; depending on price levels, this equates to hundreds of tons per day. A one-time 58-ton transaction represents only a very small portion of the daily flow—spread out, it's about 10% of an average London clearing day or much less when aggregated globally. If counterparties (bullion banks, other institutions) are on the other side, large over-the-counter trades are quietly absorbed without directly causing price distortions.
58 ton altın fiyatını anlamlı bir şekilde etkileyebilir mi?
Tek başına hayır—%15'lik bir fark söz konusu değil. İşte ölçek bağlamında bunun nedenleri:
- Piyasa büyüklüğü ve likidite: Londra tezgah üstü altın piyasası ortalama olarak günde 20 milyon ons (~620+ ton) üzerinde işlem hacmine sahip. Küresel günlük işlem hacmi (tezgah üstü + COMEX gibi vadeli işlemler + ETF'ler) genellikle 150-200 milyar doları aşıyor; bu da fiyat seviyelerine bağlı olarak günde yüzlerce tona denk geliyor. Tek seferlik 58 tonluk bir işlem, günlük akışın çok küçük bir bölümünü temsil ediyor—yayılmış halde ortalama bir Londra takas gününün yaklaşık %10'u veya küresel olarak toplandığında çok daha azı. Karşı taraflar (külçe bankaları, diğer kurumlar) diğer taraftaysa, büyük tezgah üstü işlemler doğrudan fiyat bozulmasına yol açmadan sessizce absorbe ediliyor.
@paradotor Eğer kriptoda vergi olacaksa, döviz büroları ve kuyumcularda dolar, euro, altın gibi metalar da yerinde anında alım ve satımda vergilendirilmeli. Bana bu medyada duyurulan haber eşek kaybettirip buldurmaca gibi geliyor. Yüzde 10’a razı ederler heralde en sonunda.
The "Death Spiral" schema summarized:
1. The Pump: Inflate shell valuation to attract retail liquidity.
2. The Short: Execute massive short positions at the $10.00 peak.
3. The Dilution: Trigger hyper-dilution via $0.0001 par-value issuance to the parent.
4. The Clear: Cover $10.00 shorts using $0.0001 shares, capturing the spread as instant profit.
5. The Dump: Liquidate the remaining billions of shares until the price hits $0.
Terminal extraction complete; retail serves as the final exit liquidity.👍🏻👍🏻
WHY IS THIS LEGAL (sometimes)?! 🤔
It's often a gray area. Regulatory bodies struggle to keep up with the complexity. "Failure to Deliver" (FTD) data often spikes dramatically before these implosions, hinting at unchecked naked shorting.
The system is rigged when shell games like this can be played.
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
DUE DILIGENCE: Understand a company's fundamentals.
CHECK THE FLOAT: Be wary of companies with massive, sudden share issuances.
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Support calls for stronger FTD enforcement and market oversight.
Stay vigilant. Don't be the exit liquidity for financial predators.
#StockMarket #Fraud #Investing #WallStreet #Finance #NakedShorting
The "Death Spiral" Shell Game
🚨 WARNING: HOW YOUR MONEY DISAPPEARS 🚨
Ever heard of a company going from hot stock to bankrupt in months, leaving retail investors with nothing? It's not always incompetence. Sometimes, it's a meticulously engineered financial DEATH SPIRAL.
Thread 👇 Learn how the pros fleece the market.
THE AFTERMATH: BANKRUPTCY & BAILOUTS (for the rich) 💀
Your $10.00 BioCloud shares are now worth $0.0005. BioCloud is delisted. Files for bankruptcy. You lose everything.
Apex Holdings? They've walked away with tens of millions from the initial public sale AND the shorting profits. They engineered the entire thing.
This isn't theory. It happens. Naked shorting and toxic debt financing are the tools.