Britcoin Boomer

Boomer, Brit, pioneer City quant investor, in #btc since 0920, not trading but actively timing #hodl to maximise stack

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

Btc 200w MA over $60,000. Just saying....

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

Case rests

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

Time preference seems to be forgotten on Bitcoin twitter.

Where's the BEAR?

Evidence attached for those who understand.

As a long term investor 4 year CAGR above 10% is absolutely fine

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

OpenClaw ecosystem bans mention of bitcoin

If you want the operational reason in one line: **crypto discussion has a high spam/scam coefficient relative to everything else, so banning it is cheaper than policing it.**

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

Using scenario (1 BTC: €100,000 on 1 Jan 2028; €160,000 on 31 Dec 2028).

Dutch Tax

Old Regime best guess €900

New regime best guess €21,000

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

58k brigade again. I call the bottom

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

77775 is floor level. Next step up is 822621. Then 86335

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

As of 1 Feb 2026, Bitcoin is about $78,082.

The most widely reported recent ATH was $125,835.92 on 6 Oct 2025.

That implies a current drawdown of:
(78,082 / 125,835.92 − 1) = −37.95% (≈ −38%) from the latest ATH.

Today’s −38% is nowhere near historical cycle bear-market depth (−77% to −83%).

It is roughly half of a typical full-cycle drawdown.

Big bull-market / mid-cycle corrections can still be savage:
Apr 2021 correction: about −53% drawdown (mid-cycle).

There are also many −20% to −30% corrections even in strong uptrends.

Today’s −38% is deeper than a routine bull pullback, but shallower than the big mid-cycle capitulations like 2021’s ~−53%.

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

@socialwithaayan Banana

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

@Croesus_BTC does this clarify some of the yuppie reactions to BTC?

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

7. Assessment culture that punishes original thought

In both arts and sciences, students learn:

Marks come from agreeing with the expected line.

Deviance from the mark scheme is dangerous.

That marks-driven pedagogy produces:

Deep suspicion of anything that does not yet have an “approved” answer.

A habit of quoting institutional scepticism (regulators, big newspapers) as proof.

So:

When mainstream econ labelled Bitcoin a bubble, that became the “mark scheme answer”.

When institutional reports fret about AI risks, that becomes the safe stance.

Genuine independent evaluation of these systems is never practised, so never developed.

---

8. No meta-training in “how to explore a new tool”

Very few people are ever taught:

How to approach a new domain cold.

How to run small experiments, log results, iterate.

Instead, pedagogy assumes:

A syllabus, a textbook, a tutor, a set of worked examples.

The blank box of a wallet or chatbot is therefore terrifying. You need:

Problem-finding skills.

Tolerance for initial floundering.

Without those, the person blames the tool: “It is confusing / pointless”, rather than noticing that they never learned how to explore anything unscripted.

---

9. Ideological framing delivered as catechism, not inquiry

In some humanities and social-science environments, technology, markets, and capital are introduced in a pre-framed way:

Tech = instrument of oppression.

Markets = extraction.

Corporations = enemies.

That does not make the critiques false; it makes them non-optional. You are not invited to interrogate where they apply and where they do not.

Bitcoin and AI then slot neatly into the template:

BTC = capitalist scam / climate vandalism.

AI = tool to automate exploitation / erase labour.

The judgement precedes the evidence, and the classroom rewarded that habit.

---

10. Lack of cross-disciplinary stitching

Bitcoin lives at the junction of:

Computer science, cryptography, monetary history, macro, game theory, energy.

AI lives at the junction of:

Statistics, optimisation, software engineering, cognitive science, ethics, labour economics.

Most education is siloed. People are:

Good at one discipline’s stories.

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

@jbs_hobbies @icreatelife Hmk

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

I am forming a private group of UK HNWs who hold more than 10% bitcoin in their portfolio. My DMs are open. I have been seeking to influence government departments discretely since late 2020 and already help a number of HNWs on an informal and not for fee basis

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

My 82621 long feels good . I recognise this might not age well, but I longed out of conviction, and will long ladder as we go up

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

@shweta_ai Join me?

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

82621 effective bottom ???

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

Bear desperation!

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

And what was that on a 1 second time scale . No you can't scare us!

[Britcoin Boomer @bruce_pullman]

It's funny how a paper loss of this scale (for a HODLer in a degree of scale since Sep 2020) no longer generates the cold sweats at night. We got over all that in the past 5 years. Now it's cerebral planning - do we move the bitcoin, equities, gold mix or not. Do we increase borrowing? Real grown up fund management for a volatile but conviction asset holder.