@NeovisniA@PredragM75912 Ista firma iz Njemačke ima otvorenu podružnicu u HR i za isti posao se nude dvije različite plaće. Radnik u Njemačkoj je 3 puta više plaćen. U HR troškovi života slični a isti taj nijemac može recimo kupiti nekretninu ovdje.
@ryanhammer09 As a European US team was surprisingly good this WC. To bad momentum was spoiled with red card story. Overall I see USA team even better next time.
@RGIII Jarell Quansah (ENG) got direct red card against MEx with VAR protocol offence. So, England is also eligable with the same verdict? He should be allowed to play as well? Please explain.
🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair.
We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it.
🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game):
- Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called.
- Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called.
According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball:
- The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it;
- The ball was not moving quickly;
- The direction of the ball was not unexpected;
- The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control;
- A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air."
We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside.
@HNS_CFF@selecaoportugal #WC2026 #Refereeing
@ZusBore Isti brojevi bili samo druga valuta. Ovo je strašno. Ne bi da imaš plaću 8 keka. Obično to bude dobar provod. Nešto se brcne i popije ... povedeš dite, prijatelja.
@TomislavHorva20 Ništa čudno. BIH je izbacila jedan Wales i Italiju. Prvo sami sebi moraju reći da su tu jer zaslužuju a svi ostali da daju puni respekt momcima! Sretno!