bruns303

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 thus ppl will be more satisfy with the gov, tend to be more cohesion, increase gov's capacity

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 we need the pine line project to develop economic and enhance people's employment and health care etc, thus ppl will be

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 @que303 even in the expense of environment, notice that some of the damage are reversible, mother natural heals herself

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 @que303 environment is for human survival and development, so is the economic. we just need to value which benefit us more,

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 yes technology will improve, but the patent is in the charge of others, they make the most profit

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 no matter how much manufacture we have, the technology is in other states`hand, we are consumers

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 people define it! #poli303

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 q3: quebec opposed federal spending but never eliminating it #poli303

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 unfair for rest of Canadian provinces. Within quebec not inclusive of whole pop. (what about 1st Nation ppls?) #poli303

[bruns303 @bruns303]

@simulation303 T says federal spending is an "invasion" to cultural distinctiveness #poli303