Highlighting failures of BSB to regulate barristers or protect consumers. The BSB protects a privileged elite & destroys BAME & whistleblowing barristers.
@barstandards@gardencourtlaw The Bar Standards Board is a corrupt regulator. It is designed to destroy the careers of whistleblowers as well as ethnic minorities and those from a less privileged background.
It will take no action against wealthy connected white barristers. It crushes others.
The Bar Standards Board is a corrupt regulator. It is designed to destroy the careers of whistleblowers as well as ethnic minorities and those from a less privileged background.
It will take no action against wealthy connected white barristers. It crushes others.
@legalfutures @goalajnr @BarristerSecret@CrimeGirI@Barristerblog At the same time there have been cases of absolute crystal clear dishonesty and fraud to the criminal standard. Yet the BSB will not allege dishonesty because said barrister knows the right people.
@legalfutures @goalajnr @BarristerSecret@CrimeGirI@Barristerblog The BSB is corrupt. It will make allegations of dishonesty against barristers where, for example, they have blown the whistle against the Bar Council. Knowing it will end in certain disbarment because they can control Tribunals by conversations.
The BSB has been unfit for purpose for some time. Not even the BSB is trying to pretend otherwise anymore. It has become an exercise in self justification. Many might think the amount of money it sucks out of the profession is unconscionable. https://t.co/pX2Mo4RHea
The Bar Standards Board is in crisis, with a massive backlog of investigations and poor performance on timeliness - so what do they do? Announce revised ‘social media guidance’ under which it will be professional misconduct for barristers to misgender someone on Twitter?
@banjobern@tc1415 Thereafter the BSB pursued McCarthy following vexatious complaints by another barrister. BSB changed witness statements and withheld evidence from Disciplinary Tribunal. HC and CA criticised BUT then ensured relative of original judge on second disciplinary tribunal.
@banjobern@tc1415 You do realise the BSB has ACTUALLY been found guilty of inviting a witness to alter its evidence AFTER a defendant submitted his statement and withholding material evidence from a Disciplinary Tribunal ? If you’ve read all cases in last 10 years you will be able to name the case
@legalstyleblog@tc1415 You come from a position of ignorance and lack of research, which isn’t surprising. However, you really shouldn’t comment without basic reading. SOME of the key cases have been undertaken by Marc Beaumont … in last 10 years BSB has been criticised for its corruption.
@legalstyleblog@tc1415 Have you read most of the cases over the last 10 plus years ? You obviously haven’t. Nor are you aware of the criticism by the Court of Appeal and the High Court.
@Sophiemacmac@MckelvieSteve @scribbl64805724 The Bar Standards Board is corrupt. It does not regulate barristers correctly and so the public have no protection nor certainty that the barrister they instruct is competent or honest.
@peacema19806260@afneil@spectator The Bar Standards Board is corrupt. It does not regulate barristers correctly and so the public have no protection nor certainty that the barrister they instruct is competent or honest.
@tc1415@legalstyleblog The Bar Standards Board is corrupt. It does not regulate barristers correctly and so the public have no protection nor certainty that the barrister they instruct is competent or honest.
@fatsparrowcult@DamCou The Bar Standards Board is corrupt. It does not regulate barristers correctly and so the public have no protection nor certainty that the barrister they instruct is competent or honest.
@sheharazade@Jonathan_MBanks The Bar Standards Board is corrupt. It does not regulate barristers correctly and so the public have no protection nor certainty that the barrister they instruct is competent or honest.