低频共鸣

讲一讲我认识的比特币

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@Vladcostea 是的

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@LukeDashjr @BTC_broo 比加文·安德森还疯…

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@utexocom 币安 OKX 这俩不上线都白扯

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

但闪电网络的易用性还有很长的路要走，虽然已经走了十年了…

[Voltage ⚡ @voltage_cloud]

A business says it wants USDT, but what it really needs is reliable dollar movement.

A wallet says it supports stablecoins, but the real question is what network those stablecoins move on.

A PSP says it wants lower cost, but the cost is not just the issuer fee. It is the whole path: liquidity, routing, settlement, compliance, reconciliation, and operational overhead.

Once you separate asset from rail, Bitcoin becomes the obvious contender.

It is neutral. It is global. It is resilient. It does not need a new token to justify the network.

And with Lightning, it has a payment architecture designed around direct peer-to-peer channels instead of every transaction fighting for global blockspace.

That is why Bitcoin can win the stablecoin rail conversation.

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

他担心的是没有区块奖励就没有稳定的出块收益来激励矿工挖矿。

但如果到十年之后仍然不能靠手续费来作为出块奖励稳定的激励矿工挖矿的话，比特币其实已经很失败了。所以那时候也就更没必要担心比特币的上限问题了。

无论如何，彼特.托德的担心都是多余的。

[John Carvalho @BitcoinErrorLog]

There is a fundamental argument against infinite Bitcoin tail emission for dealing with too many lost coins.

So, there are about 2.1 quadrillion units of precision in Bitcoin. This is enough to fit all the units of all the monies in the world, and more!

However, Bitcoin can only fit about 10 million active users. That's 10 million active users using enough units for BILLIONS of people.

An economy can calibrate to this amount of units by many orders of magnitude. We truly have nothing to worry about in regard to lost coins.

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

Strike是为数不多在做正确事情的项目。

[Lightning News @LightningNewsX]

JACK DORSEY: Bitcoin must be used for payments or "fails by being irrelevant"💥

It becomes irrelevant if it's only a store of value and not used for everyday payments.

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@Yendue 不是

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

很多比特币支付项目的产品，都无人问津，看了很多，产品设计问题不大

他们经常问：“怎么让更多人用比特币支付？”
但用户的问题是：
“为什么我要用比特币支付？”

没有需求，产品就无法成功

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

数据没问题，照此推算，2035年，美帝一年光国债净利息，就差不多等于今天一整年的财政赤字。

这个速度不以任何人的意志为转移

[Yishi @ohyishi]

the U.S. fiscal deficit is expected to exceed $2 trillion this yr, with annual interest payments on the national debt reaching $1 trillion.

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@jason_chen998 底是平的

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@RJDAIGOGO 有啊

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@Kevinzhan888 @MrLuAnn001 我昨天刚拿到补发的新护照

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@alexbosworth 有一个项目正在进行中，BitSeed = 用比特币闪电网络激励的去中心化文件共享协议

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@cyrixn @BitcoinErrorLog 是的，有那个时间和精力，不如做一些真实的对所有用户和潜在用户更具体验的产品。

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

TaprootAssets的USDT相比较RGB更简洁更优雅。

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

@LaiLe94654 @Hex_China @wangzhian8848 小樽确实有

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

是的，首先得让白痴都能会用，然后才会有商家采用收款。妄想通过教育来推广，不如靠赌场来的快。

[Chris Coffee @ChrisCoffeeHF]

@geyserfund It's kinda all of them,but if I have to pick 1 it would be B. If you want regular people to use Bitcoin, you can't ask them to take courses in computer science to do it. Forget about running a node for average guy.

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

市场低估了 Taproot Assets 上 USDT 的潜力。

BTC 与 USDT 共用同一钱包、同一套闪电网络，交易所和钱包接入成本更低。

配合闪电网络的低手续费、快速确认，以及未来更成熟的 BTC↔USDT 无感兑换体验，���加上 BOLT12，支付体验会非常丝滑。

相比 RGB，我更喜欢 TA 的低复杂度和统一的一致性体验。

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

是这样的，人类习惯扫码、密码和账户，机器需要的是可编程、全球通用、无需许可的原生货币。
当 Agent 开始购买算力、数据、带宽、存储和服务，1 sat 才真正显出它的意义。

[Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 @DocumentingBTC]

The next billion bitcoin users won’t be people.

[低频共鸣 @btclowecho]

如果 BIP-110 真能通过，它释放出的信号是：
以后比特币共识层可以为了限制某类用途，而收紧 Taproot 的能力。

很多建立在 Taproot 上的新协议（包括 BitVM、部分 DLC、未来一些智能合约方案），也都会开始自我审查，进而不再有创新。

Luke的共识不应该是比特币是共识。