"Excellent interview! The man, who was afraid to turn off his phone when asked, likely felt like he was being asked to turn 'himself' OFF. People have become emotionally 'merged' with their phones, so much so that the device is 'themselves'..."
https://t.co/eY3V2xc965
My strat to Maximize $S Airdrop in June. 👇
1- Grab referral code FU7QHB at https://t.co/T5l11vDoxg
2- For PP Points, mint or hold stablcoins stkscUSD or wstkscUSD (for x6) at https://t.co/ZP75J2zHcn
3 - For Activity Points, engage with many dapps on Sonic listed at https://t.co/83FqqlbzRQ
Such as : @VicunaFinance , @CurveFinance , @SiloFinance , @Rings_Protocol , @machfi_xyz , @NapierFinance , @ShadowOnSonic , @beefyfinance , @GammaStrategies , @beets_fi , @pendle_fi and more.
4 - For App points, earn GEMS by engaging with protocols too or buy them. I personally accumulate some on Shadow.
Most points farmers loop by deposit assets in a Lending & Borrowing plateform and spread other above protocols.
Be cautious when engaging with smart contracts. Don't forget to revoke from time to time.
6 Reasons Why Children Are Especially Vulnerable to Wireless Radiation 👶
Did you know that children are at a higher risk from wireless radiation exposure? Here’s why:
1️⃣ Higher Absorption: Their thinner skulls and water-rich brain tissues means they absorb more RF radiation than adults.
2️⃣ Developing Brains: Their growing nervous systems are far more sensitive to environmental toxins.
3️⃣ Cumulative Exposure: Years of daily exposure frm multiple wireless sources can add up to significant long-term health risks.
4️⃣ Impact on Learning: Disruptions in brain function can impair memory, concentration, and academic performance.
5️⃣ Reproductive Development: Early exposure may affect hormone balance and future reproductive health.
6️⃣ Increased Cancer Risk: Greater absorption and vulnerability may elevate their lifetime risk of radiation-related cancers.
Visit https://t.co/DzB4SPXgGJ if a 5G cell tower has been proposed near your home or your child's school.
🚫 New Report Contradicts Telecom Industry Claim That Wireless Radiation Is Safe
The basis for the wireless industry’s claim that radiation is safe for humans is scientifically erroneous, according to the author of a new peer-reviewed scientific report.
Paul Héroux, Ph.D., authored the report, which was published Jan. 30 in Heliyon, one of Elsevier’s journals on its ScienceDirect platform.
Héroux told The Defender:
“Industry’s most important argument to deny the health impacts of electromagnetic radiation has been that these health effects are impossible based on solid physics, specifically that the radiation is ‘non-ionizing.”
Héroux detailed the scientific faultiness of that argument:
“Ionization by the radiation itself is irrelevant because life processes produce ionization within the body itself. In fact, the basic laws of physics (Maxwell’s Equations and the Second Law of Thermodynamics) together with established biology confirm that health effects of electromagnetic radiation are in fact inevitable, and at levels much lower than those considered safe by industry.”
READ MORE 👇
https://t.co/LqcwzjpY6j
A few weeks ago I created this card in the #OpenTelemetry community tracker
https://t.co/KiQFmJh0IS
My goal is to have #Zig as a first-class citizen of OpenTelemetry, because IMO Zig is perfect for #o11y.
Say hi and let's chat!
The ACT of injecting another is the “actus reas” in criminal law. It is the ACT that has prima facie led to the death. The INTENTION in the mind of the vaccinator is the “mens rea” in criminal law. Knowledge that death may occur = Intention to do harm = criminal. Nuremberg Code.