![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9EzbsAA8MMT.jpg)
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9DgbsAAoqg1.jpg)
![pledis_17's tweet photo. [17'S 승관]
260416 #부승관의비비디바비디부
#SEUNGKWAN #승관
#SEVENTEEN #세븐틴 https://t.co/mER4HvRwIL](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HGBbbHKasAAjRTz.jpg)
Olivia
Online
ʚïɞ SL
@buddygfrd09
Just a Buddy/Na.V/LUVU/WOORIN
Joined February 2016
204 Following
71 Followers
6.6K Posts
나 여자친구 노래 듣다가 비비지 노래로 바뀔때 항상 태수
[PIC] 260622 - SinB (bscenez) ig story with Yerin
🐱Alright, so who is a new member of the shorties now?
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ #SINB #YERIN @VIVIZ_official @YERIN_OFFICIAL_
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [PIC] 260622 - SinB (bscenez) ig story with Yerin
🐱Alright, so who is a new member of the shorties now?
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ #SINB #YERIN @VIVIZ_official @YERIN_OFFICIAL_ https://t.co/VADmj6ky0X](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HLaiI-PaoAA1gxq.jpg)
[NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGYC7Da8AAyQ4c.png)
Who to follow
ANN
@Ann_Yoshikawa
KINDERGARTEN WARS ANIME en 2027🥹
SPYXFAMILY enthusiast🌸
Fan de Gfriend. Buddy, Na.v, Luvu y Woorin🥰
Fan del anime y manga.
Team HuskerDust❤️
Aún en mis 20s
◺◊◿ Ari ◺◊◿
@azuralS
Karla R. ◺◊◿ ⁶ 🌱🍀回 GFRIEND 💜💙
@karla_buddy
[Fan acc]
Spanglish ✨
Latin Buddy 💜💙
OT6 🦊🐥🐰🐶🐱🐹 @GFRDofficial
maybe if y'all listened to viviz
YERIN 4th Mini Album [REACH YOU]
Concept Photo #1
💿Release
2026.06.09 6PM (KST)
#예린 #YERIN
#REACH_YOU #YERIN_REACH_YOU
![YERIN_OFFICIAL_'s tweet photo. YERIN 4th Mini Album [REACH YOU]
Concept Photo #1
💿Release
2026.06.09 6PM (KST)
#예린 #YERIN
#REACH_YOU #YERIN_REACH_YOU https://t.co/yuarTWVve5](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJK-GfYbAAAsxwA.jpg)
VIVIZ
#Yuju returns with haunting new single “First Love Is a Curse”
https://t.co/IjvB2zqi98
Hybe's music has genuinely become so freaking bad I am actually so so so thankful Gfriend is out of there my god
It’s so sad that 2 of the composers, Megatone(13) and SCORE (13), are having their musical creativity’s wasted because those 2 are the main composers and producers of this masterpiece sung by gfriend, and mind you they only had 2 composers for this song:
![pledis_17's tweet photo. [17'S 승관]
260416 #부승관의비비디바비디부
#SEUNGKWAN #승관
#SEVENTEEN #세븐틴 https://t.co/mER4HvRwIL](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HGBbbHKbYAAT84u.jpg)
kpop is so boring without viviz
VIVIZ SINB and UMJI will be the next guests for 'Boo Seungkwan's Bibbidi Bobbidi Boo' EP. 10! 🐻 #승관
APRIL 16, 7 PM (KST).
"kpop lyrics are dumb and meaningless" meanwhile yuju writing about anxiety and dissociation and depression:
TWS covering G-Friend’s Rough 🥹❤️🩷
Category is small company Queens of Kpop
I STILL LOVE YOU CUTE PUPPY DANCING TO TIME FOR THE MOON NIGHT BY GFRIEND
eunha has the best username btw.
rlo = 은 (rotate your fon, and u will see it
ldl = 비
her real name is 정은비 (jung eunbi)
Não pra elas
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.4M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
74.2M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.7M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.4M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.9M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers