Retired Chief of Police. #MAGA, Pure 🩸, 🚫💉 Proud American! If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics SUCK. Happily married! 🚫DMs, 🚫Porn, 🚫Crypto
@YoAdrienne1968 I feel sorry for them to have been duped but still resent how awful some of them were to us. They didn't like our opinion but were totally fine with bullying everyone who didn't think like they did.
@EricLDaugh So asshole Democrats like Sherrill are perfectly fine not releasing information on "illegals" to ICE when Mamdami in New York "Doxes" his tax paying New York "citizens" putting them in jeopardy!
I quit taking my dog to a vet when they wouldn’t tell me before an annual appointment what manufacturers they use and what the vaccines were. After four years at this vet office, I found a new vet for my dog. I refused the mRNA for myself and definitely wasn’t going to subject my dog to it.
IVERMECTIN AND FENBENDAZOL END CANCER
🎯CONFIRMED: Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher states that complete remissions of stage IV cancers using antiparasitic drugs are already documented in peer-reviewed scientific literature.
According to him, hundreds of studies show that ivermectin and fenbendazole activate more than 12 different anticancer mechanisms and act against more than a dozen types of cancer.
Among the most impactful works cited by Hulscher is a case report published in Case Reports in Oncology.
There, three patients with metastatic stage IV cancer are described who achieved complete remission documented by imaging and tumor markers:
📌An 83-year-old woman with breast cancer that had metastasized to the liver, lungs, and bones. After treatment, the PET scan showed complete remission, and she has shown no recurrence in nearly three years.
📌A 75-year-old man with metastatic bone prostate cancer. His PSA dropped to undetectable levels, and the metastases disappeared completely.
📌A 63-year-old man with highly advanced BRAFV600+ melanoma. His circulating tumor DNA went from 123 to 0 in less than two months, with confirmed remission.
Additionally, a recent systematic review analyzed 26 studies with 36 real patients treated with ivermectin. No serious adverse effects were reported, and clinical improvements were observed even in cases of leukemias and lymphomas, many of them while continuing to receive conventional chemotherapy.
Alternative scientists explain that these drugs attack cancer in multiple ways: they destabilize microtubules, induce programmed apoptosis, block the mTOR pathway, cut off the glucose supply to tumor cells, inhibit the formation of new blood vessels, and eliminate cancer stem cells.
All this with medications that cost pennies and have been used in humans and animals for decades.
While conventional medicine invests billions in high-cost therapies, on social media thousands of patients are already sharing personal testimonials: tumors that shrink or disappear, markers that normalize, and surgeries that end up being canceled.
The question sweeping the world is whether this represents the greatest medical suppression in history or the most important discovery of the 21st century. The dissenting scientific community demands controlled clinical trials with urgency. For many terminal cancer patients, time has simply run out.
What do you think? Give it an RT and share this information before it disappears, as it could save many lives. Your friends or family fighting cancer need to read this today.
He’s cooked…and rightfully so. Goodbye, former Major, enjoy Fort Leavenworth.
Here’s what civilians don’t understand. Active-duty service members (especially officers) have severely restricted political speech rights compared to civilians. They may express personal political opinions privately or as spectators out of uniform, but not in uniform at partisan events or in ways that appear to use their position/official status. The military’s position is that such actions violate the oath to the Constitution by undermining the chain of command and civilian control of the military. Claims of “civil disobedience” or constitutional duty do not exempt service members from these rules.
The Air Force and Department of War will almost certainly investigate.
Similar past cases involving uniformed political protests have led to swift disciplinary action.
Violations:
Article 92 – Failure to obey order or regulation: He violated DoD Directive 1344.10 (Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces), which explicitly prohibits active-duty members from:
-Participating in partisan political activities while in uniform.
-Wearing the uniform at political events, rallies, protests, or demonstrations.
-Engaging in conduct that could reasonably imply official military sponsorship, approval, or endorsement of a political cause or candidate. Air Force implementing guidance (e.g., DAFI 51-508) reinforces these restrictions. Violating this directive via Article 92 is common in such cases. https://t.co/cRkMMrtwYz
-Article 133 – Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman: This applies specifically to commissioned officers. It covers actions that compromise the officer’s character, bring discredit upon the armed forces, or show a lack of integrity or fitness for command. Appearing in uniform on the Capitol steps to publicly demand the impeachment, conviction, and removal of the President (while in service dress with name/rank visible) can reasonably be viewed as conduct that undermines military discipline, public trust in the military’s apolitical nature, and the chain of command. This is a serious officer-specific offense.
-Article 88 – Contempt toward officials: This makes it punishable for a commissioned officer to use “contemptuous words” against the President (or Vice President, Congress, etc.). His public speech accusing the President of “high crimes,” unconstitutional usurpation of power, and calling for his impeachment/conviction/removal—delivered in uniform—could be interpreted as contemptuous. Courts-martial have applied this article in cases involving direct public criticism of civilian leaders. Punishment can include dismissal.
-Article 134 – General article: This catch-all covers conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces. It could apply to the overall incident (uniformed protest, arrest, public political statements against the sitting President).
-Disloyal statements or speech that undermines military effectiveness/loyalty, though Articles 88, 92, and 133.
Potential Consequences:
-Court-martial: Conviction could result in dismissal from the service (the officer equivalent of a dishonorable discharge), forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction in rank, and confinement (up to several years depending on the charges and findings).
-Administrative actions: his command could pursue non-judicial punishment (Article 15), administrative separation, loss of security clearance, or other career-ending measures.
-Loss of retirement benefits, VA benefits, future federal employment eligibility, and professional reputation.
Anyone who gives money to support him will be throwing it away…UCMJ is a whole different animal and it is not swayed by public outcry, petitions, or misinformed Liberals with stupid signs.
He’s done. And nobody will remember his name or this idiotic action he undertook at the urging of another idiot, @RepAlGreen .
Cc @usairforce@SecWar
Well said Brian. If he truly has 17 years of service and is still a Major, it probably means he got passed over for Lt Col meaning his career was over a couple years ago. So now he is looking to get in favor with the leftists for a political career. Provided he lucks out and stays out of Leavenworth.
Nuking the filibuster is NOT the only way to pass the SAVE America Act
We could pass it if we took up the bill again and agreed to keep debating it until it passes, eating into weekends and recesses as necessary
This used to be THE way to break a filibuster—and it’d work here
@JohnCornyn Spiteful losers like you are what is accelerating lame-duck status. You are proving you don't give a rip about the American people. You are disgusting.