🚨 HOLY CRAP. The FBI has BUSTED an EXPLOSIVE DRONE terror plot that targeted President Trump's UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House
They planned to blow up explosive-packed drones, and forcing crowds a "pre-staged SNIPER TEAM"
"A second wave to storm the White House gate."
A network of nearly 24 suspects IDENTIFIED, at least 5 in custody @FBIDirectorKash
Thank God for law and order!
Although I offered to help when I saw @RealCandaceO's post (I don't know her personally), as others had tagged me to do so, this was an interesting rebuttal by the @FBI.
So... I'll go after the documents, too. I don't have an agenda with getting them. I just love getting documents that the public (even if just part of it) wants to see.
I'll post 100% of the case without paraphrasing, so all can see exactly how it goes down every step of the way.
From what I've seen, this should be a straight forward FOIA case, and one that yes, may have delays aka "unusual circumstances" on the side of the FBI (it is their director's travel schedule, so I can understand as much as I hate delays). But it was also posted that the FBI "denied" the request, which if the FBI is to be believed here, is not the case.
That said, there is no room for paraphrasing either by, for, or against the U.S. government.
So, I'll offer it all as I go. Those who care, will see it. Those who don't, can just ignore it.
Do you have nothing better to do than be a nitpicking little bitch in front of the world? Are you not embarrassed that other countries can read this account?
When we said “denied” we meant denied the mandated 20 day turnaround for an FOIA response. We WERE, in fact, denied that citing “unusual circumstances”.
Which is why we included a link to the full episode where we showed on what 3 grounds that denial was made plus suggesting adjustments from your office.
Do you have a better way to spend our tax dollars then behaving like a boomer who doesn’t understand that X is meant to be pithy? Is “clickbait” a legitimate Department of Justice concern?
Who is running this account?
Can we FOIA that? 🤡
To the intern running this X account— you’ll note that we did not put your response in quotation marks. That’s called, “paraphrasing”.
When you wrote back to us suggesting that we “reduce the scope of [our] request” while referring to our request for a mere 3 day itinerary as “substantive” we appropriately paraphrased on for fellow X users that our request was too burdensome. We then published your full response as well as our full request onto our show for public to read themselves.
Glad to see you are actually capable of respond “rapidly” to smear people that won’t let go of Charlie Kirk’s death. Do you mind utilizing a similar speed to get Tyler Robinson’s defense team the documents they’ve been requesting and which have mysteriously been in your possession since September?
Thanks in advance, Chief.
Via FOIA, we formally requested Kash Patel’s travel itinerary for the 3 days leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination and we just heard back and were told the burden of the request is too great.
How is this even remotely legal?
Dear @RealCandaceO
Please show us on the document sent to you ACKNOWLEDGING your FOIA request where we said:
“The burden of the request is too great.”🤔🤔
Your “show” just like the fake news media will be called out when you LIE!
We hope this helps.