Ethereum ecosystem worth hundreds of billions
but we still don’t have a decent official faucet.
And no, sending people to random node providers doesn’t count.
Just look at Solana’s faucet.
@VitalikButerin@solana@ethereum@ethcforg
Crypto revenue mostly comes from:
trading fees
transaction fees.
Builders create the markets where this activity happens.
Yet most builders capture none of that upside.
This is a design problem.
#buildbond#crypto#fairlaunch
What if builders could directly participate in the markets they create?
Not through VC.
Not through tokens printed out of thin air.
But through real usage.
$_
BuildBond isn’t just a launchpad.
It gives developers:
• Market-driven funding (via trading activity fees)
• On-chain distribution transparency
• A way to discover early believers
Coins are signals.
Community is the product.
$_
#buildbond#pumpfun
We’re not an approval committee.
Anyone can launch —
if they’re willing to:
• Prove they build
• Lock capital
• Follow transparent rules
Fully on-chain.
https://t.co/WP2027bxfC made launching easy.
We want to make launching accountable.
Because most rugs happen when:
• Dev has 0 cost
• Dev holds huge supply
• Dev can sell immediately
We remove all three.
Rules are simple:
- Repo must be verified
- Dev must stake collateral (locked N months)
- Dev initial buy ≤ 2.5%
- Dev tokens locked at least 3 months
- Linear unlock after
Skin in the game is mandatory.
We’re building a launchpad where:
• Dev must verify a GitHub/GitLab repo
• Dev must stake SOL/ETH
• Dev cannot dump early
• Dev cannot hold too much supply
Code first. Coin later.