@black_monk1248 well i dont need to prove to you who i am, but i am studying in a tier 1 eng college w/o any reservation so i def know more than you do
@black_monk1248 abe laude jaake pdh toh is case ke baare me, she explained every bit of her invention liie how she made it in the court, when he was asked the same he could not. Why he was not able to explain technicalities of a machine he made himself lmao
@black_monk1248 Cooked up you say? Child this was proven in the court, the "men" wrote about it. Don't make up hypothetical scenerios for your disbelief in women actually doing something productive.
@black_monk1248 Stupid take, a man taking credit of something which was proved wrong is the main objective of my reply to the question you asked. Also in your tweet you did not use the term "world changing" so dont undermine a invention that did change the world somewhat
@black_monk1248 The Invention: In 1868, while working at the Columbia Paper Bag Company in Springfield, Massachusetts, Knight realized that envelope-shaped paper bags were flimsy and could not stand on their own. She invented a highly complex machine to mass-produce square, flat-bottomed bags.
@black_monk1248 The Proof: Knight completely dismantled his argument by entering the courtroom with extensive documentation. She brought her detailed blueprints, original design sketches, dated journals, and development notes, and called upon machine-shop witnesses
@black_monk1248 The Court Battle: Knight filed a patent interference lawsuit against Annan in 1870. In court, Annan’s primary defense was a heavily biased argument: he claimed that a woman could not possibly understand the mechanical complexities required to build such a machine.
@black_monk1248 The Theft: She built a successful wooden prototype but sent the design to a machine shop to have an iron model forged for her patent application. A machinist named Charles Annan saw her iron model, copied her exact design, and quickly filed a patent application under his own name