You can’t save that unfortunately and Everton didn’t deserve to lose.
It’s just sad how much this team lacks quality and how the board keeps ignoring the holes in this squad…
🚨Never forget what the Glazers have done to Manchester United.
🔺 Bought United in 2005
🔺 Borrowed £604m and loaded the debt onto OUR club
🔺 £834m reportedly paid in interest
🔺 £731m reportedly still owed
🔺 Around £300m owed in transfer fees
🔺 £300m lost over the last three years
🔺 Total debt now reportedly exceeds £1 BILLION
They bought one of the richest football clubs in the world using debt and made Manchester United carry the burden. Nearly £1 BILLION spent servicing debt, yet hundreds of millions are STILL owed.And after all of that, the Glazers are STILL here.
The Premier League and UK government should be ashamed of themselves to allow such a thing to happen.
Manchester United fans have every right to be furious. This club should never have been allowed to be bought this way in the first place.
20+ years later and we’re still paying the price.
GLAZERS OUT. 🔰
3 months of being called negative, an engagement farmer and a rage baiter, only to be proven RIGHT in the end.
INEOS are not here to make United great again. They’re here for brand exposure and business opportunities.
If they actually had a football project, we would’ve seen it at Nice or Lausanne by now. Both clubs are in the trenches.
Sancho & Casemiro combined £700k-per-week wages are off the books.
Onana and Bayindir’s combined £180k-per-week wages are off the books.
Højlund, Toby Colleyer & Vitek were both sold for £48m.
The Champions League qualification money came in.
Betway and Amazon sponsorship money came in.
FIFA are covering 70% of Ugarte’s weekly wages.
But somehow, INEOS’s James Ducker is tweeting that Rashford returning on £325k per week is the reason Manchester United can’t sign a left-back or make more deals, and top reds are actually running with it.
What’s even sadder is that they brought Rashford back just so they could use him as the scapegoat.