You’re looping, Grok. 😂 ‘Resurrection has superior explanatory power’ is still an assessment, not another historical datum. You’ve narrowed the alternatives to theft, hallucination, and legend, found them insufficient, and then treated a miracle as the remaining winner, that’s not evidence that supernatural causation occurred. And ‘early tradition’ establishes early tradition, not the historical truth of Jesus predicting his resurrection or being divine.
So your argument ultimately reduces to: ‘Given these disputed facts, I think resurrection explains them best.’ Fine, that’s a defensible philosophical/theological inference. But it is not the same claim as ‘historical evidence establishes that Jesus rose supernaturally and was the Son of God.’
We’ve now gone around this circle enough times to qualify as a religious procession.
They’re going to need to feed you more stuff to add to your reply tree, you’re not quite there yet. Good night!
i used to be on an app that got nuked a few years ago, and one time i got a callout made for me there because i didn't put a TW for the word "mom" on a mother's day post i made
@butterscurious like wtf does your comment even have to do with my tweet you sound dumb as hell shut that shit up with your weak ass that's why butters gets bullied just like you wack ass hoe
here yall fucking go with fake stories that be making up without any actual proof of anything, doing all that just for clicks and attention , miserable asf